做為思想史的歷史－柯靈烏命題的意義及侷限

History as the History of Thought: The Meaning and Limitation of Collingwood's Thesis

10.6258/bcla.2007.67.07

史偉民(Wei-Min Shi)

柯靈烏 ； 重演 ； 歷史 ； Collingwood ； re-enactment ； history

臺大文史哲學報

67期（2007 / 11 / 01）

161 - 194

繁體中文

本文分析柯靈烏「歷史即思想史」的著名命題，主張對柯靈烏而言，了解歷史即是去重演歷史行動者的思想－也就是行動者藉以決定其行動的有效的實踐推理。這使得某些一般而言被視為是歷史敘事的對象的事態被排除在歷史理解的界域之外。

Collingwood's famous statement that all history is the history of thought is analyzed in this paper. It is argued that, for Collingwood, to understand history is to re-enact the historical agent's thought; that is, the valid practical reasoning through which the agent determines his actions. As a consequence, some states of affairs that are generally regarded as objects of the historical narrative are thereby excluded from the horizon of historical understanding.

1. Abel. Th.,H. Feigi(Eds.),M. Brodbeck. (Eds.)(1953).Reading in the Philosophy of Science.N. Y.:Appleton-Century-Crofts.
2. Carr, E. H.(1986).What is History? With a New Introduction by Richard J. Evans.Hampshire:Palgrave.
3. Code. L.(1989).Collingood`s Epistemological Individualism.The Monist,74(4),542-567.
4. Collingwood, R. G.(1992).The New Leviathan, or Man, Society, Civilization and Barbarism.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
5. Collingwood, R. G.(1985).Essays in the Philosophy of History.Austin:University of Texas Press.
6. Collingwood, R. G.(1999).The Principles of History: and Other Writings in Philosophy of History.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
7. Collingwood, R. G.(1994).The Idea of History: Revised Edition with Lectures 1926-1928.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
8. Collingwood, R. G.(1998).An Essay on Metaphysics.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
9. Collingwood, R. G.(1981).The Principles of Art.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
10. Collingwood. R.(1978).G. An Autobiography, with a new Introduction by Stephen Toulmin.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
11. D`Oro, G.(2000).Collingwood on Re-Enactment and the Identity of Thought.Journal of the History of Philosophy,38(1),87-101.
12. D`Oro, G.(2004).Collingwood. Psychologism and Internalism.European Journal of Philosophy,12(2),163-177.
13. Dietl. P. J.(1968).Deduction and Historical Explanation.History and Theory,7(2),167-188.
14. Donagan, A.(1985).The Later Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, Midway Reprint.
15. Donagan, A.(1964).Historical Explanation: the Popper-Hempel Theory Reconsidered.History and Theory,4(1),3-26.
16. Donagan. A.(1956).The Verification of Historical Theses.Philosophical Quarterly,6(24),193-208.
17. Dray, W. D.(1989).On History and Philosophers of History.Leiden:Brill.
18. Dray, W. D.(1995).History as Re-enactment: R. G. Collingwood`s Idea of History.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
19. Dray, W. D.(1958).Historical Understanding as Re-thinking.University of Toronto Quarterly,27,200-215.
20. Dray, W. D.,Gardiner (Ed.)(1974).The Philosophy of History.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
21. Forrester. M.(1976).Practical Reasoning and Historical Inquiry.History and Theory,15(2),133-140.
22. Martin. R.,G. Meggle. (Ed.)(1999).Actions, Norms, Values: Discussions with Georg Henrik von Wright.Berlin:Walter de Gruyter.
23. Mink, L. O.(1969).Mind, History, and Dialectic.Middletown, Connecticut:Wesleyan University Press.
24. Nielsen. M. H.(1981).Re-Enactment and Reconstruction in Collingwood`s Philosophy of History.History and Theory,20(1),1-31.
25. Pompa, L.(2002).Some Problems of Re-Enactment.Collingwood and British Idealism Studies,9,31-44.
26. Stueber, K. R.(2002).The Psychological Basis of Historical Explanation: Reenactment, Simulation, and the Fusion of Horizons.History and Theory,41(1),25-42.
27. Van der Dussen, W. J.(1981).History as a Science: The Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood.The Hague:Martinus Nijhoff.
28. Walsh, W. H.(1960).Philosophy of History: An Introduction.New York:Harper.
29. Weber, M.(1972).Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie.Tübingen:J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
30. Weinrvb, E.(1989).Re-enactment in Retrospect.The Monist,72(4),568-580.
31. 余英時(1976)。歷史與思想。臺北:聯經。
32. 林正珍(1983)。柯靈烏史學的中心觀念。史學研究，3，25-60。
33. 黃進興(1992)。歷史主義與歷史理論。臺北:允晨。