今本何氏《解詁》弒殺異文辨

Variations of Shi and Sha in He Xiu's Interpretations of Gongyang Commentary

10.6258/bcla.201911_(92).01

郜積意(Gao, Ji-yi)

《公羊傳》 ； 何休 ； 弒殺異同 ； 以何還何 ； Gongyang Commentary ； He Xiu ； similarities and differences of versions of Shi and Sha ； revivification of He Xiu's version via his interpretations

臺大文史哲學報

92期（2019 / 11 / 01）

1 - 48

繁體中文

今日《公羊》諸本，無論單經本、經注本、注疏本，多見弒、殺異文。於單經本，熹平石經與唐石經不同，董仲舒、蔡邕、何休所見經傳亦互殊。於經注本，陸德明所見與《解詁》原本有異；徐彥撰疏所據本亦非《解詁》之舊。於注疏本，宋十行本與明九行本（閩本、北監本、毛本）、清武英殿本以下亦有參錯。欲定其間是非，則須以何還何、以陸還陸、以徐還徐。「還何」之要，在於深究何氏義例。明乎何氏弒例及三十六弒之義，即可辨別《解詁》諸本弒、殺之異同。

Nowadays there are variations of Shi (弑) and Sha (殺) in different editions of Gongyang Commentary, be they single editions, or editions with notes, or editions with commentary. As far as single editions are concerned, the version of Xiping Shijing (classics carved on the stone in the period of Xiping reign) differed from that of the Tang Shijing (classics carved on the stone in the Tang Dynasty). Dong Zhongshu, Cai Yong and He Xiu had different editions. As regards editions with notes, Lu Deming saw a version different from the original Interpretations of Gongyang Commentary. Xu Yan who wrote the notes didn't base them on the original version. As for editions with commentary, there were errors and omissions in the edition of ten lines of the Song Dynasty and the edition of nine lines of the Ming Dynasty (the Min edition, the edition of Beijing Imperial College and the Mao edition) as well as the edition of the Wuying Palace in the Qing Dynasty. To distinguish rightness from wrongness, it is necessary to reveal the original versions of He Xiu, Lu Deming and Xu Yan. The key to understanding He's version lies in probing the examples and definitions given by He. Understanding He's examples of Shi and 36 definitions of Shi will help clarify the similarities and differences of different versions of Shi and Sha in Interpretations of Gongyang Commentary.

1. (1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
2. (1997).續修四庫全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
3. (2010).春在堂全書.南京:鳳凰出版社.
4. (1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
5. (1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
6. (1997).續修四庫全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
7. (1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
8. (1997).續修四庫全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
9. (1997).續修四庫全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
10. （宋）洪适(1986).隸釋.北京:中華書局.
11. （南朝宋）范曄(1965).後漢書.北京:中華書局.
12. 唐‧徐彥，《公羊疏》，名古屋：蓬左文庫藏鈔本 30 卷。
13. （唐）陸德明(2013).經典釋文.上海:上海古籍出版社.
14. （唐）賈公彥(2017).儀禮疏.杭州:浙江古籍出版社.
15. （清）阮元（校刻）(1989).十三經注疏.臺北:藝文印書館.
16. （清）段玉裁(1981).說文解字注.上海:上海古籍出版社.
17. （清）凌曙(1975).春秋繁露注.北京:中華書局.
18. （清）梁玉繩,賀次君（點校）(1981).史記志疑.北京:中華書局.
19. （清）黃丕烈（輯）(2010).士禮居黃氏叢書.揚州:廣陵書社.
20. （清）鍾文烝,駢宇騫（點校）,郝淑慧（點校）(2009).春秋穀梁經傳補注.北京:中華書局.
21. （清）蘇輿,鍾哲（點校）(1992).春秋繁露義證.北京:中華書局.
22. （清）顧廣圻,王欣夫（輯）(2007).顧千里集.北京:中華書局.
23. （清）龔自珍,王佩諍（校）(1999).龔自珍全集.上海:上海古籍出版社.
24. （漢）司馬遷(1982).史記.北京:中華書局.
25. （漢）何休(2003).春秋公羊經傳解詁.北京:北京圖書館出版社.
26. （漢）何休(2003).春秋公羊經傳解詁.北京:北京圖書館出版社.
27. （漢）班固(1962).漢書.北京:中華書局.
28. （漢）劉珍,吳樹平（點校）(2008).東觀漢記校注.北京:中華書局.
29. 中國社會科學院歷史研究所文化室（編）(2011).明版閩刻十三經注疏.北京:東方出版社.
30. 中華書局編輯部(1997).景刊唐開成石經：附賈刻孟子嚴氏校文.北京:中華書局.
31. 施之勉(1987)。春秋之中弒君三十六亡國五十二。大陸雜誌，71(1)，29-30。
32. 馬衡(2014).漢石經集存.上海:上海書店.
33. 高步瀛(1997).古文辭類纂箋.長春:吉林大學出版社.
34. 郜積意(2015)。漢石經《春秋》殘字合證與碑圖之復原。文史，2015(4)，5-65。
35. 張麗娟(2010)。宋余仁仲萬卷堂刻《春秋公羊經傳解詁》的兩個印本。中國典籍與文化，2010(4)，70-75。
36. 許維遹(1980).韓詩外傳集釋.北京:中華書局.
37. 黃暉(1990).論衡校釋.北京:中華書局.
38. 趙善詒(1985).說苑疏證.上海:華東師範大學出版社.
39. 劉文典(1989).淮南鴻烈集解.北京:中華書局.
40. 謝德瑩(1987)。《春秋》書弒例辨。孔孟月刊，25(6)，14-26。