台灣促參執行問題之統計與分析

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ON TAIWAN’S PPP IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES

10.6652/JoCICHE.201712_29(4).0006

薛春明(Chuen-Ming Hsueh)；張陸滿(Luh-Maan Chang)

促參 ； 基礎建設 ； 獨立樣本T檢定 ； 單因子變異數分析 ； public-private partnerships (PPP) ； infrastructure ； independent samples T-test ； one-way ANOVA

中國土木水利工程學刊

29卷4期（2017 / 12 / 01）

269 - 276

繁體中文

台灣自85年首度辦理高鐵BOT案，後續紛紛採用促進民間參與公共建設方式(下稱促參)興辦基礎建設以提升國家競爭力；其中有成功，亦不乏失敗者。因相關文獻尚乏系統性地採用定量分析方法來研究台灣促參執行之問題，爰本研究先廣泛蒐集台灣產、官、學界等3類專家，共200份針對促參執行現況9個關鍵問題之有效問卷；並利用獨立樣本T檢定以確認促參執行迄今相關問題，供後續改善參考。復利用單因子變異數分析，證實3類專家們針對該等促參問題並未有顯著地不同意見。根據統計分析，專家們不認為：台灣官員具有辦理甄審最優申請人與管理促參之相關專業；同時亦未滿意台灣促參執行的績效。本研究建立的模式與結論可供後續研究提升台灣促參執行績效之依據。

Since Taiwan opened up ICB (international competitive bidding) for her first High Speed Rail BOT (Build-Operate-Transfer) project in 1996, many PPP (Public-Private Partnerships) infrastructure projects were subsequently launched by the authorities to enhance her national competitiveness. Among them, some are successful projects and some are failure. As quantitative analyses were rarely used by previous researchers to study the Taiwan’s PPP implementation issues, this study aimed to statistically analysis the current Taiwan’s PPP implementation data and to identify some of the PPP implementation issues for further improvement. A questionnaire survey was conducted. Expert inputs from private, public and academic sectors were solicited. After the data collected, the independent samples T-test was performed to verify whether or not these 200 experts agreed on the nine crucial PPP implementation questions derived from the survey. Then, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was analyzed to verify that there is no significant difference existed on the opinions among the three different sectors of experts. The study results did not support the null hypothesis that the government officials possess adequate professional knowledge to select and to manage the preferred bidders. In addition, experts were not satisfied with the effectiveness of PPP projects in Taiwan. Hopefully the findings and the generic framework of statistical analyses constructed in the study could lay a foundation for further improving the effectiveness of executing Taiwan PPP projects.

1. Al-Hammad, A. M.(2000).Severity index (Descriptive Analysis).Journal of Automation in Construction,17,480-488.
2. Berenson, M. L.,Levine, D. M.,Krehbiel, T. C.(2012).Basic Business Statistics: Concepts and Applications.Boston, USA:Prentice Hall.
3. Cheng, H.-K.(2010).Lessons learned from BOT infrastructure development in Taiwan: A case study of the Taiwan high speed railway (THSR) project.Public Administration Quarterly,34(1),51-75.
4. Cheung, E.,Chan, A. P. C.,Kajewski, S.(2012).Factors contributing to successful public private partnership projects: Comparing Hong Kong with Australia and the United Kingdom.Journal of Facilities Management,10(1),45-58.
5. Cheung, E.,Chan, A. P. C.,Lam, P. T. I.,Chan, D. W. M.,Ke, Y.(2012).A comparative study of critical success factors for public private partnerships (PPP) between Mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.Facilities- Special Issue on Facility Management Development,30(13/14),647-666.
6. EPEC=European PPP Expertise Center(2011).The Guide to Guidance-How to Prepare, Procure and Deliver PPP Projects.Luxembourg:
7. Fellows, R.,Liu, A.(1997).Research Methods for Construction.UK:Blackwell.
8. Idrus, A.,Sodangi, M.,Husin, M. H.(2011).Prioritizing project performance criteria within client perspective.Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology,3(10),1142-1151.
9. IMD=International Institute for Management Development(2017).World Competitiveness Yearbook.Lausanne, Switzerland:IMD=International Institute for Management Development.
10. Ismail, S.,Ajija, S. R.(2013).Critical success factors of public private partnership (PPP) implementation in Malaysia.Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration,5(1),6-19.
11. Li, B.,Akintoye, A.,Edwards, P. J.,Hardcastle, C.(2005).Critical success factors for PPP/PFI projects in the UK construction industry.Construction Management and Economics,23(5),459-471.
12. Siegel, S.(1956).Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.London:McGraw-Hill.
13. Siegel, S.,Castellan, J.(1988).Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences.London:McGraw-Hill.
14. Soomro, M. A.,Zhang X. Q.(2016).Evaluation of the functions of public sector partners in transportation public-private partnerships failures.Journal of Management in Engineering,31(4),1-11.
15. Tiong, R. L. K.,Yeo, K. T.,McCarthy, S. C.(1992).Critical success factors in winning BOT contracts.Journal of Construction Engineering Management,118(2),217-228.
16. TMOF (Taiwan Ministry of Finance), 2016 Scope, Type and Terminated Contract Number of Promoting Private Participation Cases in Taiwan Area, Provided by Department of Promotion of Private Participation, Ministry of Finance, Taipei, Taiwan (2017).
17. UNECE=United Nations Economic Commission For Europe(2008).Guidebook on Promoting Good Governance in Public-Private Partnerships.New York:
18. WB,ICA,PPIAF(2009).Attracting Investors to African Public-Private Partnerships: A Project Preparation Guide.Washington DC, USA:
19. Zhang, X. Q.(2005).Criteria for selecting the private-sector partner in public-private partnerships.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,131(6),631-644.
20. Zheng, S.,Tiong, R. L. K.(2010).First public-private-partnership application in Taiwan’s wastewater treatment sector: Case study of the nanzih BOT wastewater treatment project.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,16(1),913-922.
21. 江耀宗(2015)。台灣民間參與公共建設政策回顧與展望。BOT 制度研討會，台北:
22. 陳永祥,洪德旋,劉玉山,馬秀如,黃武次,李炳南(2010).台灣高鐵BOT 策略與執行成效之檢討專案調查研究報告.台北:監察院.
23. 陳炳宏(2006)。台北，國立台灣大學土木工程研究所。
24. 董仁邦(2007)。基隆，國立海洋大學河海工程學系。
25. 薛春明,張陸滿(2013)。建構促參雙贏篩選原則解析。營建知訊，368，48-55。
26. 簡良鑑(2016)。台北，國立台灣大學國際企業學系兼研究所。