题名

「一個簡單生活的地方」:瑞克利夫(William Ratcliffe, 1870-1955)筆下的田園城市

并列篇名

"A Simple Life Place": William Ratcliffe's Representation of the Garden City

DOI

10.3966/101562402020010038001

作者

張琳(Chang, Lin)

关键词

瑞克利夫 ; 田園城市 ; 列奇沃斯 ; 郭爾 ; 卡姆登小鎮派 ; William Ratcliffe ; Garden City ; Letchworth ; Spencer Gore ; the Camden Town Group

期刊名称

藝術評論

卷期/出版年月

38期(2020 / 01 / 01)

页次

1 - 43

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

田園城市(The Garden City)是都市史上的一項重大發明,由英國社會改革家霍華德(Sir Ebenezer Howard, 1850-1928)所提出,以農業經濟打造低密度、多綠地的新型城市,用意是解決工業化之後,大城市的擁擠汙染和鄉間的日益衰退,這兩方面的問題。人類歷史上首座田園城市建立於1903年,位在倫敦北方,名叫「列奇沃斯田園城市」(Letchworth Garden City)。在藝術史上,目前只有前衛繪畫派郭爾(Spencer Gore, 1878-1914)所畫的列奇沃斯田園城市風景畫,有比較完整的討論。但是根據筆者蒐集,發現描繪列奇沃斯田園城市的畫作,數量上最多(達六十多幅,郭爾為二十多幅)、作畫時間最長者(近三十年內都有畫作問世;而郭爾只有一個夏天訪問該城),應屬當地畫家威廉.瑞克利夫(William Ratcliffe, 1870-1955)。相較於郭爾以「後印象派」筆觸來表現,加入同個前衛畫派的瑞克利夫,畫面就顯得平淡、簡單許多。本文以多筆親自蒐集的原文史料為基礎,進行詳細的圖像分析、詮釋瑞克利夫作品的圖像意義。期間並與郭爾的畫作交相比較討論。筆者將論證瑞克利夫以恬淡為主的風格,反而是當地風俗民情更佳的再現。另外,「田園城市」的概念在國內社會上時有所聞,反映人們亦期待都市生活空間有所改善、更加綠化,如同一座「田/花園城市」。因此本文以史上首座田園城市的風景圖像為研究對象,對於國內讀者具參考價值。還有,當代藝術創作者不乏以城市景觀和個人生活空間,作為創作主題。故本文對於瑞克利夫作品的分析討論,亦可提供讀者思考。

英文摘要

The "Garden City" is an important concept in Urban History. Proposed by British social reformer Sir Ebenezer Howard (1850-1928), and with an economy based on agriculture, it aimed to create a less populated city with more greenery, thus solving at the same time the problems of polluted and crowded cities on the one hand, and the depopulated countryside on the other. The world's first Garden City was built in Letchworth, north of London, in 1903. In Art History, only avant-garde artist Spencer Gore's (1878-1914) paintings of Letchworth Garden City have received much attention. However, local artist William Whitehead Ratcliffe (1870-1955) produced the most paintings of Letchworth Garden City (more than 60, while Gore produced 20 or so) over the longest span of time (almost 30 years, whereas Gore spent only one summer). Compared to Gore, who painted with Post-Impressionist brushstrokes, Ratcliffe who was also a member of the avant-garde group, tended to paint simpler compositions using lighter colors. Based on first-hand archive materials, this paper will conduct a detailed visual analysis and interpretation of Ratcliffe's paintings. I will also compare Gore's and Ratcliffe's works. I will argue that Ratcliffe's simpler style may constitute a better representation of the local life and people of Letchworth Garden City. Besides these considerations, the idea of a garden city is often heard in contemporary Taiwan. This shows that we expect our urban environment to improve and to have more greenery, like a garden city. Therefore, this paper, focusing on the landscape imagery of the world' first Garden City, is of interest to Taiwanese readers. Additionally, many contemporary artists use cityscape and private space as the subject-matter for their artistic creations. Following this, this paper, which analyzes and discusses Ratcliffe's works, may also provide some food for thought.

主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
参考文献
  1. “ Letchworth, The Road.” Art UK. Accessed November 8, 2019. https://artuk.org/ discover/artworks/letchworth-the-road-15594
  2. Alfrey, Nicholas(ed.),Daniels, Stephen(ed.),Postle, Martin(ed.)(2004).Art of Garden: The Garden in British Art, 1800 to the Present Day.London:Tate.
  3. Allwood, Rosamond(2011).William Ratcliffe: Paintings, Prints and Drawings.Letchworth Garden City, UK:North Hertfordshire District Council.
  4. Allwood, Rosamond(2003).Garden City to Camden Town: The Art of William Ratcliffe.Letchworth Garden City, UK:Letchworth Museum and Art Gallery.
  5. Baron, Wendy(1979).The Camden Town Group.London:Solar.
  6. Barrell, John(1983).The Dark Side of the Landscape: The Rural Poor in English Painting, 1730-1840.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  7. Beevers, Robert(1988).The Garden City Utopia: A Critical Biography of Ebenezer Howard.London:Macmillan.
  8. Bonett, Helena(ed.),Holt, Ysanne(ed.),Mundy, Jennifer(ed.)(2012).The Camden Town Group in Context.London:Tate Research.
  9. Clayre, Alasdair(ed.)(1977).Nature and Industrialization: An Anthology.Oxford, UK:Open University Press.
  10. Corbett, David Peters(1998).‘Gross Material Facts’: Sexuality, Identity and the City in Walter Sickert, 1905-1910.Art History,21(1),45-64.
  11. Corbett, David Peters(ed.),Perry, Lara(ed.)(2001).English Art 1860-1914: Modern Artists and Identity.New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press.
  12. Craven, Tim(2002).Harold Gilman and William Ratcliffe: A Clean and Solid Mosaic.London:Paul Holberton.
  13. Creese, Walter L.(ed.)(1967).The Legacy of Raymond Unwin: A Human Pattern for Planning.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
  14. Hayes, David(ed.)(2003).Streets of Camden Town.London:Camden History Society.
  15. Holt, Ysanne(2003).British Artists and the Modernist Landscape.Burlington, VT:Ashgate.
  16. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of To-Morrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1902. https://archive.org/details/gardencitiestom00howagoog.
  17. Howard, Ebenezer. To-Morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform. London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1898. https://archive.org/details/tomorrowpeaceful00howa
  18. Maddren, Maureen(ed.)(1995).Letchworth Recollections.Baldock, UK:Egon.
  19. Miller, Mervyn(1989).Letchworth: The First Garden City.Chichester, UK:Phillimore.
  20. Miller, Mervyn(2006).Hampstead Garden Suburb: Arts and Crafts Utopia?.Chichester, UK:Phillimore.
  21. Panofsky, Erwin,李元春(譯)(1996).造型藝術的意義.臺北市:遠流.
  22. Ratcliffe, William(1953).Ratcliffe, William. Letter to Southampton Art Gallery. 1953. Southampton Art Gallery Archive..
  23. Sickert, Walter Richard. “Idealism.” The Art News, May 12, 1910, 217. https://ww.tate.org.uk/art/research-publications/camden-town-group/walter-richard-sickert-idealism-r1104279
  24. Upstone, Robert(ed.)(2008).Modern Painters: The Camden Town Group.London:Tate.
  25. Ward, Stephen V.(ed.)(1992).The Garden City: Past Present and Future.London:E. & F. N. Spon.
  26. Williamson, Hazel R.(1992).UK,University of Leicester.
  27. 胡永芬(編輯),周翼夫(譯)(2002).捕捉生命的微光:希克特.臺北市:閣林.
  28. 埃比尼澤.霍華德, Ebenezer,金經元(譯)(2014).明日的田園城市.北京市:商務印書館.
  29. 張君勱(1988).社會主義思想運動概觀.臺北縣:稻鄉.
  30. 陳芳君(2020)。艾班尼澤.霍華德(Ebenezer Howard, 1850-1928)與其「田園城市」理論。史學研究,22,177-215。
被引用次数
  1. 張琳(2020)。從「萬能鑰匙」到「永久居住」-田園城市早期的圖像和形象(1898-1909)。興大人文學報,64,27-65。