题名

官方論述下的「他者」：南越「解放」前後的繪畫雕塑

并列篇名

The 'Other' under the Official Discourse: Paintings and Sculptures in the period around the 'Liberation' of South Vietnam

DOI

10.3966/101562402021070041001

作者

嚴智宏(Yen, Chih-Hung)

关键词

他者 ； 北越藝術 ； 南越藝術 ； 國家建構 ； 越南 ； Vietnam ； art of South Vietnam ； art of North Vietnam ； the other ； nation-building

期刊名称

藝術評論

卷期/出版年月

41期（2021 / 07 / 01）

页次

1 - 71

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

在越南官方的論述中，1975年「解放」前，南越（以西貢為代表）的藝術不合北越之意，因為根據其定義，藝術必須為工農兵服務，展現他們團結合作、抵抗外侮及犧牲奉獻的形象。據此定義，那時南越的藝術工作者是在追求個人或少數人私利，呈現上流社會奢侈浮華、虛榮浪費之習癖，在藝術上幾無實質內涵可言。本文重新檢視當時的繪畫與雕塑，發現不少南越藝術家跟得上時代潮流，學習到國際新知，追求創作上的自由，也有佳作出現。然而，在官方眼中，那個年代的南越藝術可說是越南國家建構的過程中不見容於北越當局的「他者」，南越藝術家們在官方的論述中成了隱形人。本文認為，由於意識型態歧異甚大，南越多數作品是不符北越所需、不合其意，並非一無所有。
英文摘要

In the official discourse of modern Vietnam, the art of South Vietnam (especially that of Saigon) before its 'liberation' in 1975 is of little interest. For, by definition, art must serve the masses of workers, peasants and soldiers, presenting a positive image of hard work and optimism. According to this definition, in the eyes of North Vietnam, the artists of South Vietnam at that time were generally pursuing their own personal interests, reflecting the luxurious and wasteful habits of high society. This article examines the paintings and sculptures of that time, and finds that some artists of South Vietnam kept up with the trends of the times, quickly learned new international knowledge, pursued free creativity, and produced good works of art. However, in the eyes of the Government, with its focus on nation-building, the above-mentioned art of South Vietnam, is intolerable, being regarded as 'the other'. Accordingly, it almost becomes invisible one in official discourse. The art of South Vietnam can be said to be in defiance of the authority of North Vietnam, but that does not mean it is without merit.
主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
参考文献
  1. Kang, Peter(2015).Remapping National Geography in the Street-naming of Hồ Chí Minh City.Journal of Geographical Science,77,31-48.
    連結：
  2. 金進(2015)。冷戰 1950、1960 年代新馬文學：以《大學論壇》（新）和《蕉風》（馬）兩大期刊為討論對象。臺灣東南亞學刊，10(2)，41-79。
    連結：
  3. 嚴智宏(2005)。東南亞文化與社會。東南亞文化教學參考手冊，南投縣:
    連結：
  4. Fonds Direction des Finances de l’Indochine. Dossier No.2175.“Mission d’Inspection des Ecoles des Arts décoratifs de l’Indochine faite par Tardieu (Victor) - Directeur de l’Ecole des Beaux- Arts (1924-1935).”National Archives Center I.
  5. Nguyen Phuoc. No date.“Biography.”Nguyen Phuoc. http://nguyenphuoc.com/Bio/index.htm (Accessed on Mar. 28, 2021)
  6. Barash, Jeffrey Andrew(2016).Collective Memory and the Historical Past.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  7. Bender, Lucas Rambo(2019).Other Poetry on the An Lushan Rebellion: Notes on Time and Transcendence in Tang Verse.Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies,79(1&2),1-48.
  8. Bourdieu, Pierre(1996).The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field.Oxford:Polity Press.
  9. Halbwachs, Maurice(1992).On Collective Memory.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  10. Hauser, Arnold(2018).The Philosophy of Art History.Oxford:Routledge.
  11. HỘI ĐỒNG CHÍNH PHỦ(1977).HỘI ĐỒNG CHÍNH PHỦ. Nov. 11, 1977. Số: 297-CP. Hà Nội: HỘI ĐỒNG CHÍNH PHỦ, VIET NAM..
  12. Huynh, Boi Tran(2005).Sydney,University of Sydney.
  13. Huynh-Beattie, Boitran(2010).Saigonese Art during the War: Modernity versus Ideology.Cultures at War: The Cold War and Cultural Expression in Southeast Asia,Ithaca:
  14. Karnow, Stanley(1991).Vietnam: A History.NY:Penguin Books.
  15. Kraevskaia, Natalia(2005).From nostalgia towards exploration: essays on contemporary art in Vietnam.Hanoi:Kim Dong.
  16. Lim, Aurora Roxas(2005).Southeast Asian art and culture: Ideas, forms, and societies.Jakarta:Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
  17. MacFarlane, Scott(2007).The Hippie Narrative: A Literary Perspective on the Counter-culture.Jefferson NC:McFarland.
  18. Nguyễn, Lương Tiểu Bạch(2005).Mỹ thuật Việt Nam hiện đại.Hà Nội:Viện mỹ thuật, Trường đại học mỹ thuật Hà Nội.
  19. Nguyễn, Quân(2010).Mỹ thuật Việt Nam thế kỷ 20.Hà Nội:Nhà xuất bản Tri thức.
  20. Organizing Committee(1962).Catalogue of First International Exhibition of Fine Arts of Saigon, 1962.Saigon:First International Exhibition of Fine Arts of Saigon.
  21. Quang Viet(2000).My Thuat Thu Do Ha Noi .Hanoi:Fine Arts Publishing House.
  22. Rooney, Dawn F.(2001).Angkor Observed.Bangkok:Orchid Press.
  23. Scott, Phoebe(2009).Art and the Press in the Colonial Period.Essays on Modern and Contemporary Vietnamese Art,Singapore:
  24. Steinle, Peggy. February 21, 1971.“Vietnam: The Artist’s Agony,”The New York Times. Page of Art.
  25. Tạ Tỵ.“Biography.”Jun. 26, 2019. Vietnam: The Art of War. https://Vietnam theartofwar.com/1921/05/03/ta-ty-biography/ (Accessed on Jan. 5, 2021)
  26. Taylor, Nora A.(2001).Framing the National Spirit Viewing and Reviewing Painting under the Revolution.The Country of Memory: Remaking the Past in Late Socialist Vietnam,Berkeley:
  27. Thai Tuan(1962).Trien Lam Quoc Te Lan Nhut.Back Khoa,141,70-73.
  28. The Communist Party of Vietnam(1976).Political Report of the Party Central Committee at the Fourth National Congress.Hanoi:The Truth Publishing House.
  29. The editors of Discussion(1965).“Creative Group.”Discussion.Saigon:Creative Publishing House.
  30. The editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. May 29, 2020.“Realism, art.”Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/art/realism-art. (Accessed on Jan. 5, 2021)
  31. The editors of Hanoiarttours. Jul. 8, 2016.“Nam Son Painter Life & Artworks.”Hanoiarttours. https://www.hanoiarttours.com/nam-son-painter-life-artworks/ (Accessed on Mar. 28, 2021)
  32. The editors of Vietnam Net Bridge Jul. 6, 2013.“La Vang Holy Land - Where art sublimates.”Vietnam Net Bridge. https://english.vietnamnet.vn/fms/art-entertainment/80022/la-vang-holy-land---where-art-sublimates.html (Accessed on Sept. 28, 2020)
  33. The editors of VOA Jan 25, 2019.“Lê Ngọc Huệ và quần thể tượng mầu nhiệm Mân Côi nhà thờ Đức Mẹ La Vang.”VOA. https://www.voatiengviet.com/a/le-ngoc-hue-nha-tho-duc-me-la-vang/4757727.html (Accessed on Sept. 28, 2020)
  34. The editors of VOA Oct 20, 2019.“họa sĩ mang thông điệp‘tử vì đạo.”VOA. https://www.voatiengviet.com/a/trinh-cung-hoa-si-mang-thong-diep-tu-vi-dao/5127350.html (Accessed on Sept. 28, 2020)
  35. The editors of Wikipedia. May 16, 2019.“Mai Chửng.”Wikipedia. https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mai_Chửng (Accessed on Jan. 5, 2021)
  36. Todes, Daniel Philip(2002).Pavlov’s Physiology Factory: Experiment, Interpretation, Laboratory Enterprise.Baltimore MD.:Johns Hopkins University Press.
  37. Trần, Trọng Đăng Đàn(2000).Văn hóa, văn nghệ Nam Việt Nam 1954-1975.Hà Nội:Văn Hóa -Thông Tin.
  38. Trinh, Cung(2019).Trinh Cung: Hanging on The Easel 1962-2018.Orange County, CA:Van Hoc.
  39. Trinh, Cung(2013).Trụ cột Hòa Bình-Tác phẩm điêu khắc giá trị bị hắt hủi.Mỹ thuật Việt Nam-Những vấn đề xoay quanh,Calif. USA:
  40. Trinh, Cung. Feb. 15, 2019.“Sự gặp gỡ giữa hai tài năng điêu khắc Tây Ban Nha Josep Maria Subirachs và Việt Nam Lê Ngọc Huệ trong cùng một đề tài về Thiên Chúa.”Damau. https://damau.org/52328/su-gap-go-giua-2-tai-nang-dieu-khac-tay-ban-nha-josep-maria-subirachs-va-viet-nam-le-ngoc-hue (Accessed on Sept. 28, 2020)
  41. Trinh, Cung(2009).Vietnamese Art During the War.Essays on Modern and Contemporary,Singapore:
  42. Truong Chinh(1975).Chu Nghia Mac va Van Hoa Viet-Nam.Hanoi:Su That.
  43. Tucker, Spencer(2001).Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War: A Political, Social, and Military History.NY:Oxford University Press.
  44. Tulane Gallery. No date.“Buu Chi.”Tulane Gallery. http://tulanegallery.com/gallery/buu-chi-gallery/#jp-carousel-413 (Accessed on Mar. 28, 2021)
  45. Vietnamese Young Artists’Association(1973).Our Declaration.Saigon:Vietnamese Young Artists’Association.
  46. Zelizer, Barbie(1995).Reading the past against the grain: the shape of memory studies.Critical Studies in Mass Communication,12(2),214-239.
  47. 外交部(1962)。外交部。1962年12月18日。〈關於西貢首屆國際美展事〉。外（51）情二20207號。
  48. 白適銘(2019).春望．遠航．秦松.臺中市:國立臺灣美術館.
  49. 吳介祥。Sept. 5, 2012。〈藝術自由之法律與文化面向—並以德國、美國為例〉。ATSS。http://www.atss.org.tw/Seminar/20120905/B1/B1-1.pdf（ 檢索日期：2021 年 1 月 5 日）
  50. 李有成(2012).他者.臺北市:允晨.
  51. 周達觀,夏鼐（校注）(2000).真臘風土記.北京市:中華書局.
  52. 林晉士(2007)。南北文化交流對北朝文學發展的影響。屏東教育大學學報，26，445-470。
  53. 高夏, Christopher,譚天（譯）(2018).越南：世界史的失語者.新北市:聯經.
  54. 國立歷史博物館(1962)。國立歷史博物館。1962 年 9 月 29 日。〈為遴介黃君璧教授為參加西貢國際美展代表請鑒准并轉有關機關予以便利由〉。（51）臺博研字第 276 號。
  55. 國立歷史博物館(1962)。國立歷史博物館。1962 年 10 月 17 日。〈為黃君璧教授代表本國出席西貢國際美展評審會函請察照由〉。（51）臺博研字第 312 號。
  56. 許嘉猷(2011).藝術之眼：布爾迪厄的藝術社會學理論及其在臺灣之量化與質化研究.臺北市:唐山.
  57. 郭彥瑋(2017).越南現╱當代美術史概論.高雄市:風雅軒.
  58. 郭彥瑋(2019)。法屬東洋美術學院與越南現代漆美術的起源。2018 藝術與設計國際研討會論文集，屏東市:
  59. 陳淑芳(2005)。文化憲法。全球化與政府治理，臺北縣:
  60. 陳鴻瑜(2020).東南亞史概論.新北市:國立空中大學.
  61. 葉言都(2019).讓我們來到南朝＋讓我們來到北朝.臺北市:時報出版.
  62. 維基編輯部。Nov. 18, 2020。〈禁忌〉。維基。https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/禁忌（檢索日期：2021 年 1 月 5 日）
  63. 維基編輯部。Mar. 25, 2021。〈長征〉。維基。https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/長征（檢索日期：2021 年 3 月 28 日）
  64. 蔡克振(2018).溫故．知新：1930-2006 越南磨漆畫研究文集.廣州市:嶺南美術.
  65. 賴俊雄(2014).回應他者：列維納斯再探.臺北市:書林文化.
  66. 嚴智宏(2020)。1960 年代的雪泥鴻爪：從第一屆西貢國際美術展談起。史物論壇—國立歷史博物館學報，24，5-45。
  67. 嚴智宏(2019)。論東南亞國協「文化遺產合作」面對的挑戰：以泰、柬邊界之柏威夏寺為例。探索東南亞宗教文化之多元性：交流、在地化、融合與衝突，臺南市:
  68. 嚴智宏(2001)。見證歷史，與時俱進：泰國佛像與歷史情境的關係。東南亞研究論文系列，臺北市:
print cancel