文藝、權力與公共性

Literature, Power and Publicity

10.7065/MRPC.200406.0051

劉千美(Johanna Liu)

公共領域 ； 公眾 ； 文藝寫作 ； 行動 ； 語言 ； public sphere ； public ； artistic writing ； praxis ； lexis

哲學與文化

31卷6期（2004 / 06 / 01）

51 - 61

繁體中文

本文主要目的是從當代文藝美學的觀點探討文藝與政治之間的關係。首先，本文從權勢的角度，分析文藝與政治的雙向關係。其次，從公共領域與私人經驗之間的的辯證歷程，分析作家寫作與公共領域、作品與公眾的內在意義，以闡譯文藝與政治之間的存在關係。第三，根據「政治生活」的概念，指出文藝和政治如何在行動和語言的意義下成為密切相關的人的活動，然而文藝之旨趣，更是要在共同世界中創造永恒。

The purpose of this article is to investigate, from the view point of contemporary aesthetics of literature, the inter-relationship between the Literary Art and the Politics. The first part of this article consists in the analysis the double meanings of this relationship in the context of political/artistic power. The second part consists to illuminate the existential relationship of literary writing and public sphere by analyzing the meaning of writing, works, and public audience. The third par of this article consists to point out that, only under the concepts of 'praxis', 'lexis', the two elements of political life in Greek culture, the understanding of inner relation between literary writings and politics will be possible.

1. Edward W. Said(1994).Representations of the Intellectual.London:Vintage.
2. Hanna Arendt(1958).The Human Condition.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
3. Jacques Attali(2001).Bruits :Essai sur l'économie politique de la musique.Paris:Fayard/PUF.
4. Jean-Paul Sartre(1948).Qu'est-ce que la literature?.Paris:Gallimard.
5. Jürgen Habermas,Thomas Burger(trans.)(1991).The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere-An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society.Cambridge,Massachusetts:The MIT Press.
6. Pierre Bourdieu,Loïe Wacquant(1992).An Invitation of Reflexive Sociology.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
7. Roland Barthes,Annette,Colin Smith(trans.)(1963).Witing Degree Zero.New York:Hill and Wang.
8. Terry Eagleton,Dorota Glowacka,Stephen Boos(ed.)(2002).Between Ethics and Aesthetics-Crossing the Boundaries.New York:State University of New York Press.