士林哲學感性認識論

On the Sensible Epistemology of Scholasticism

10.7065/MRPC.200407.0019

李政達(Vence Jen-Ta Lee)

感覺 ； 感覺象 ； 感性認識 ； 認識之二律背反 ； Sense ； Sense Object ； Sensible Cognition ； the Paradox of Cognition

哲學與文化

31卷7期（2004 / 07 / 01）

19 - 36

繁體中文

認識上實際存在著物質與精神的二律背反，士林哲學以實在論的立場主張認識主體，所認識之對象為外在於主體意識的物質實體存有。。但由於對象是物質的，而認識的結果卻是精神的，在這其中必定存在著某種轉換，而此轉換的關鍵即在於感性認識之中。本文將針對士林哲學的感性認識論作初步的探討，試圖說明物質與精神的二律背反於實在論中的消解。分由以下四個面向進行說明：一、桊由對感覺象之討論，以指出感性至悟性以至理性連通的可能。二、對感性認識對象乃是與主體別之事物，突顯實在論的基本立場。四、感覺象表徵的乃是客體對象的真正性質，揩出認識具體實誰的可能；希冀透過本文的討論，而對士林哲學的感性認識論有初步的掌握。

There is actually a paradox between the material and the spiritual regarding cognition. On the ground of ontology, scholasticism maintains that the object cognized by the cognitive subject is a material entity outside the subject’s consciousness. Yet while the object belongs to the material and the result of cognition is spiritual, there must be some kind of transformation whose key lies in the sensible cognition. In this paper, we are to make a rudimentary exploration of the sensible epistemology of scholasticism in order to explain the resolution of the paradox between the material and the spiritual in ontology. And we will proceed along with four dimensions: first, to point out the possible link from sensibility to understanding and to reason by means of an discussion about the sense object; second, to present the most fundamental metaphysical structure of sensible cognition through demonstrating the conditions to form sensibility; third, to further stress the basic grounds of ontology by pointing out that the object of sensibility cognition id distinct from the subject; and fourth, the sense object indeed typifies the true nature of the object in order to point out the substantial possibility of cognition. It is hoped that through the discussion here, we can have a rudimentary understanding of the sensible epistemology of scholasticism.

1. Aristotle.De Anima, 413b5.
2. Aristotle.De Anima, 419b9.
3. Aristotle.Meta., 1027b20.
4. Aristotle.Physics, V, 226b19.
5. Aristotle.De Anima, 418bl-b4.
6. Aristotle.De Anima, 418b28.
7. Aristotle.De Anima, 430al.
8. Aristotle.De Anima, 417a1-417b30.
9. Aristotle.Physics, 212a20.
10. Aristotle.De Anima, 419a19.
11. Aristotle.Meta., 981a2.
12. Aristotle.De Anima.
13. Aristotle.De Anima, 432a3-8.
14. Aristotle.De Memoria et Reminiscentia, 449b9.
15. Aristotle.De Anima, 418a26.
16. Aristotle.De Interpretatione, 16al-17a7.
17. Aristotle.Physics, I, 191b28.
18. Aristotle.Posterior Analytics, 99b38.
19. Aristotle.De Anima, 423b8.
20. Aristotle.De Interpretatione.
21. Aristotle.De Anima, 419b34-4204.
22. Aristotle.De Anima, 425b25.
23. Aristotle.De Anima, 421b7.
24. Aristotle.De Anima, 418b10.
25. Berkeley, George.Principles of Human Knowledge, Sec. 34.
26. Berkeley, George.Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous, Second Dialogue.
27. Berkeley, George.Third Dialogue.
28. Berkeley, George.Principles of Human Knowledge, Sec. 6, p.63, Sec. 48, p.80.
29. Berkeley, George.Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous.First Dialogue.
30. Berkeley, George.Philosophical Commentaries.
31. Berkeley, George,David M. Armstrong(ed.)(1974).Philosophical Commentaries, from Philosophical Writings.London:Collier Macmillan.
32. Berkeley, George,David M. Armstrong(ed.)(1974).Principles of Human Knowledge, Secs. 9-15.Philosophical Writings.
33. Brentano F.,R. Chisolm(ed.)(1967).Realism and the Background of Phenomenology.N.Y.:
34. Brugger、項退結編譯(1976)。西洋哲學辭典。台北:先知出版社。
35. CK, Grenet, P. B.(1962).Les 24 thèses Thomistes (De l'évolution à l'éxistence).Paris:P. Tequi.
36. Donceel, Joseph, S. J.(1970).A Maréchal Reader.N.Y.:Herder and Herder.
37. Gilson, Etienne(1967).Études sur le rôle de la pensée médiévale dans la formation du système cartésien.Paris:J. Vrin.
38. Gilson, Etienne.The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas.
39. Gilson, Etienne,L. K. Shook(trans.)(1956).The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas.New York:Random House.
40. Hume, David.A Treatise of Human Nature.
41. Hume, David,L. A. Selby-Bigge(ed.)(1988).A Treatise of Human Nature.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
42. Hume, David,L. A. Selby-Bigge(ed.)(1992).Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
43. Locke, John.IV, ch. 1, V. 1.An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.
44. Locke, John.II, ch. 8, V. 11-12, 16-19,23.An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.
45. Locke, John.IV, ch. 8, V. 8,9.An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.
46. Locke, John,A. S. Pringle-Pattison(Abridged/Ed.)(1964).II, ch.8, V. 23.An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.
47. Lonergan, Bernard J. F.(1958).Insight: A Study of Human Understanding.London:Longman.
48. Maréchal.cahier I.Le point de départ de la métaphysique.
49. Maréchal, Joseph.cahier V.Le point de départ de la métaphysique.
50. Maréchal, Joseph.cahier V.Le point de départ de la métaphysique.
51. Maréchal, Joseph(1944).Le point de départ de la métaphysique.Paris:Desclee de Brouwer.
52. Maritain, Jacques(1958).Distinguer pour unir ou les degrés du savoir.Belgique:Desclee de Brouwer.
53. Maritain, Jacques.Distinguer pour unir ou les degrés du savoir.
54. Noël, Léon.Le réalisme immédiate.
55. Phillips, R. P..an accident, which makes the subject have parts ouside parts.Modern Thomistic Philosophy.
56. Rahner, Karl,R. Givord(trad.),H. Rochais(trad.)(1968).L'esprit dans le monde, La métaphysique de la connaissance finie chez saint Thomas d'Aquin.Paris:
57. Thomas.In De Anima, III, 7.
58. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I., Q.76, a.8.
59. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I., Q.76, a.l, c.
60. Thomas.Metaphysics, I., L.l, C. 8.
61. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I., Q. 84, a.7.
62. Thomas.De Veritate, Q.10, a.6, c.2.
63. Thomas.Summa Theologica, Ⅰ., Q.85, a.l, ad.4.
64. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I., Q.54, a.1.
65. Thomas.Summa Theologica, III, Q. 77, a.2.
66. Thomas.Summa Theologica, Ⅰ., Q79, a.3, c.
67. Thomas.Summa Theologica, Ⅰ.,a.5, ad.2.
68. Thomas.De Veritate, Q.8, a.6, c..
69. Thomas.Summa Contra Centiles, Ⅰ., Q.77, n.659.
70. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I-II., Q.12, a.l.
71. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I., Q.88, a.1, ad.3.
72. Thomas.In De Anima, II, 24.
73. Thomas.Summa Theologica, 1., Q.78, a.3.
74. Thomas.Physics, I, 4, lect.6.
75. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I., Q.16, a.2.
76. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I., Q.79, a.3.
77. Thomas.In I Sent., d.3, q.2, ad3.
78. Thomas.In II Sent., d.3, Q.1, a.4.
79. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I., Q. 77, a.6.
80. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I., Q. 86, a.l.
81. Thomas.Summa Theologica, Ⅰ., Q.85, a.l, ad.1.
82. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I, Q. 50, a.2.
83. Thomas.In IV Sent., d. 12, Q. 1, a. 1.
84. Thomas.Summa Theologica , I., Q. 14, a.2.
85. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I., Q. 84, a.l.
86. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I., Q.77, a.7.
87. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I., Q.12, a.11.
88. Thomas.In De Anima, II, 12.
89. Thomas.Summa Theologica, Ⅰ., Q.85, a.l, c.
90. Thomas.De Spiritualibus Creaturis, a.9, ad.6.
91. Thomas.In De Anima, II, 10.
92. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I, Q. 12, a.4.
93. Thomas.Summa Theologica, I, Q. 14, a.1.
94. Van Riet, Georges.Problèmes d'épistémologie.
95. Van Riet, Georges(1960).Problèmes d'épistémologie.Louvain-Paris.
96. Van Steenberghen, Fernand.Philosophie fondamentale.
97. Van Steenberghen, Fernand.Philosophie fondamentale.
98. Van Steenberghen, Fernand(1989).Philosophie fondamentale.Québec:edition du Preambule.
99. Van Steenberghen, Fernand.Philosophie fondamentale.
100. Wild, John(1948).Introduction to Realistic Philosophy.N.Y.:Harper.
101. 柴熙譯(1983)。認識論。台北:臺灣商務印書館。
102. 關永中(2000)。知識論（二）近世思潮。台北:五南圖書出版公司。

1. 尤煌傑(2015)。臺灣新士林哲學界對知識理論的闡述：繼承與轉化。哲學與文化，42(7)，37-54。
2. (2006)。論認識的「意向」——知識傳遞可能之探討。哲學與文化，33(5)，101-118。