青年朱熹的哲學探索－以《延平答問》對“理一分殊”的討論為中心

On Young Chu Xi's Phlosophical Inquiry

10.7065/MRPC.200507.0081

沈享民(Hsiang-Min Shen)

理一而分殊 ； 仁 ； 義 ； The principle is one but its manifestations are many ； Benevolence Jen ； Rightousness Yi

哲學與文化

32卷7期（2005 / 07 / 01）

81 - 92

繁體中文

本文試圖解釋青年朱熹的哲學探索，以《延平答問》為文本，將焦點集中在「理一分殊」的討論，以期對了解朱熹哲學成熟時的思想有所助益。在李侗的指導下，對一些重要的哲學概念及其相互之間的關係（諸如「仁」、「義」、「理一分殊」），朱熹呈現自己的理解，並得到李侗的指正，這點在兩人對「理一分殊」的討論上尤其有意義。一方面可以顯示李侗哲思的特質，另一方面可以看出朱熹哲學的大體方向。

This paper attempts to explicate young Chu Xi's philosophical inquiry. In the light of the text, The Correspondence between Li-tung and Chu Xi, I focus on their discussion on ”li-yi-fen-shu” (this doctrine states that the principle is one but its manifestations are many. LYFS below). From this, we can understand Chu Xi's later mature philosophy more adequately. Under Li-tung's supervision, Chu Xi presented his cognition of importance philosophical concepts, such as ”benevolence (Jen),” ”rightousness (Yi),” and ”LYFS”, including their interrelations. His interpretation of these concepts was amended immediately by Li-tung in their correspondence. Moreover, it is significant that LYFS was discussed thoroughly and deeply between them. On the one hand, we can show the characteristics of Li-tung's philosophical thinking; on the other hand, the direction of Chu Xi's philosophical development would be envisioned.

1. 劉滄龍(2010)。「一理」或「分理」？─戴震對程朱理學的反省。中央大學人文學報，44，-123-148。
2. (2013)。王船山對《孟子．人之所以異章》的詮釋─以《讀孟子大全說》為例。東海大學文學院學報，54，91-118。