题名

A Metaphysical Dialogue with Professor. Thaddaeus Hang-From the Metaphysics of Substance to the Metaphysics of Relation

并列篇名

與項退結教授的形上學對話-從實體形上學到關係形上學

DOI

10.7065/MRPC.200509.0023

作者

谷寒松(Luis Gutheinz)

关键词

實體本體 ; 附體偶然性 ; 關係關聯 ; 實體形上學 ; 關係形上學 ; 典範範例 ; 典範的轉變典範的轉移 ; 動態的 ; 宇宙性的仁 ; Substance ; accidents ; relation ; metaphysics of substance ; metaphysics of relation ; paradigm ; paradigm shift ; static ; dynamic ; cosmic ren

期刊名称

哲學與文化

卷期/出版年月

32卷9期(2005 / 09 / 01)

页次

23 - 48

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

本文,是以文學性的對話方式寫成,意欲描繪二位真誠朋友的真實思想史。四十年來我們深思在人類與基督徒存在之本質和基本問題。我們稱他為:從一個更靜態的思想典範逐漸轉移,從「實體形上學」邁向一個相互補充的、更動態的思想典範,我們稱他為「關係形上學」。 在多年以來盡力的搜尋與洞悉,這不是選擇這個或那個典範的問題,而是思考將兩種典範相互補充到接近認識真實的實在界;此認識有兩種來源,即:人類心智中的洞悉內在的能力,以及在信仰中接受神性啓示的光照。 項退結教授逐漸學會以更加動態的方式,表達他所思維的「宇宙性的仁」(cosmic ren)。此對話的作者卻依據今日學術界之思想期流,更進一步地發揮所謂的「關係形上學」,對「實體形上學」之必要和相互補充的形上學典範。

英文摘要

This article, written in the literary form of a dialogue, intends to portray the real thought-history of two genuine friends. The forty years of reflection on esssential and basic questions of our human and Christian existence, moved gradually from a more static paradigm of thought, which we call the 'metaphysics of substance', towards a complementary and more dynamic paradigm of thought, which we call the 'metaphysics of relation'. In a years long searching effort of reflection the promising insight surfaced, that it is not a question of chosing this or that paradigm, but rather to consider the two paradigms as complementary approaches to reality as such, known by the human mind due to its inner capacity for insight, and by divine revelation accepted in faith. Professor Hang (Xiang Tui Jie)gradually learned to express his more dynamic pattern of thinking with the category of the 'cosmic ren', whereas the author of this dialogue tries to unfold the 'metaphysics of relation' against the background of modern thought in the world of sciences, understood as a necessary and complementary metaphysical paradigm to the metaphysics of substance.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
被引用次数
  1. 陳德光(2019)。沈清松教授對天主教思想本位化的貢獻──追述與懇談。哲學與文化,46(11),23-36。