海德格與作為形而上學的神學

Heidegger's Deliberations on Theology as Metaphysics

10.7065/MRPC.200602.0023

孫周興(Zhou-Xing Sun)

海德格 ； 神學 ； 實證科學 ； 存在學 ； 形而上學 ； Heidegger ； Theology ； Positive Science ； Philosophy of Existence ； Metaphysics

哲學與文化

33卷2期（2006 / 02 / 01）

23 - 35

繁體中文

前期海德格把神學規定為一門需要哲學（存在學）來調校的「實證科學」，後期海德格則把神學落實到形而上學的「先驗－超驗」二元問題結構和基本機制中來加以把握。無論是前期還是後期，海德格對神學的理解都與他的形而上學批判工作相聯繫，並且都以哲學與神學的關係問題為著眼點。而海德格神學之思的關切點可以歸結為：在哲學終結、神學式微的後形而上學時代裹，一種非哲學的思想如何可能？又何所作為？

Theology was taken as a positive science regulated by philosophy in the first phase of Heidegger's thinking, but was grasped and realized as the structure of a priori- transcendental dichotomy in and fundamental mechanism of metaphysics. In both phases, his theological concerns and criticism of Western metaphysics are closely related, focusing on the relationship between philosophy and theology. The central point of Heidegger's deliberations on theology can be summarized in two questions: At the end of philosophy and after the decline of theology, and in our post-metaphysical era, is a non-philosophical thinking still possible? And what does it do if it is the case?

1. (2010)。為什麼海德格爾要談最後的上帝？處理《哲學論稿》一個核心問題的建議。國立政治大學哲學學報，24，1-33。