情境倫理、現象學心理學與質性研究

Situation Ethics, Phenomenological Psychology and Qualitative Research

10.7065/MRPC.200602.0051

蔡錚雲(Chen-Yun Tsai)

情境倫理 ； 現象學心理學 ； 質性研究 ； situation ethics ； phenomenological psychology ； qualitative research

哲學與文化

33卷2期（2006 / 02 / 01）

51 - 65

繁體中文

現象學心理學與超越現象學的關係被胡塞爾看成既平行又重疊的。這個看法十分不清楚，在現象學發展中也一直無法妥善地解決，卻在應用學科的領域裡被證成。這是怎麼發生的？又意味著什麼呢？本文透過後設倫理與規範倫理之間的情境倫理，就其與描述倫理之別，指出現象學心理學作為一種質性研究的解決之道。此即是說，現象學心理學因情境倫理展現出其自身，情境倫理亦因現象學心理學恢復其存有論意義。

The relationship between phenomenological psychology and transcendental phenomenology is regarded by Husserl as parallel and overlapping. It is neither a clear thought, nor has been solved properly by the development of phenomenology, but justified in the practical field of apply sciences. How does it happen? What is it meant? In this paper, we point out the solution by considering the phenomenological psychology as a qualitative research through the distinction between descriptive ethics and situation ethics, which is in between meta-ethics and normative ethics. That is to say, phenomenological psychology shows itself to us due to situation ethics, while situation ethics regains its ontological sense due to phenomenological psychology.

1. 賴憶嫺、李維倫(2009)。現象學方法論：存在行動的投入。中華輔導與諮商學報，25，275-321。
2. 王心運(2022)。尊重自主的現象學探討－臨床倫理的主體或他者？。應用倫理評論，73，69-86。
3. 王心運(2022)。尊重自主的現象學探討－臨床倫理的主體或他者？。應用倫理評論，73，69-86。