認知與模態

Cognition and Modality

10.7065/MRPC.200606.0079

張戈(Ge Zhang)

先驗的 ； 必然的 ； 偶然的 ； 不可改變性 ； 可改變性 ； 嚴格指示詞 ； a priori ； necessary ； accidental ； changelessness ； changeability ； rigid designator

哲學與文化

33卷6期（2006 / 06 / 01）

79 - 100

繁體中文

沿著克裏普克的道路，本文進一步闡明了他的有關認知模態理論的觀點，但是，在一個重要點上，本文所闡明的模態觀點與他所闡明的模態觀點之間存在一個巨大差異，即：本文認爲模態本質上是物件或事實的模態，它與真理或事實密切相關，而與語言無關。爲此，本文把這種模態理論稱爲存在論的模態理論。它具有以下特點，即：它重實際，輕理論，只關心存在的事實，而對理論的預言不感興趣。它的一條重要格言是：存在的即必然的。

According the thought of Saul Kripke (1941-), this paper attempts to explain Kripke's view on the cognitive modal theory. But it is very important to point out there is a great difference between this paper and Kripke's view on modality; the modality I concerned is essentially the modality of the thing or the fact, which is related with truth or fact closely, but not with language. Therefore, I call this kind of modality as the modal reality, which is concerned more on the real aspect than the theoretical aspect, and on the fact of existence than on the theoretical prophecy. There is an important axiom: ”what exists is the necessary.”