题名 |
論康德主體概念的兩個向度 |
并列篇名 |
The Two Dimensions of Kant's Concept of Subject |
DOI |
10.7065/MRPC.200609.0165 |
作者 |
王建軍(Jian-Jun Wang) |
关键词 |
康德 ; 功能性主體 ; 實體性主體 ; functional subject ; substantial subject ; individual ; community ; Kant's successors |
期刊名称 |
哲學與文化 |
卷期/出版年月 |
33卷9期(2006 / 09 / 01) |
页次 |
165 - 180 |
内容语文 |
繁體中文 |
中文摘要 |
康德哲學的主體概念歷來只是被看成是先驗的功能性主體:理性,但是,要達到對康德主體概念的完整理解,還需要對主體概念的另一向度進行考察。這就是實體性主體:個體。因此,實體性主體和先驗主體同時構成了康德主體概念的兩個重要向度。雖然實體性主體在康德的先驗方法中遭到了拒斥,但向於它對康德哲學的基本走向產生了重大的影響,所以本文強調它是康德主體概念的一條暗線。實體性主體對康德哲學的影響主要是通過個體與群體的對立統一而起作用的。康德的後繼者們沒有看到康德主體概念的這兩個向度,而是片面地發展了康德先驗主體中普遍性的一面,從而把近代主體性哲學推向了絕對主體主義。 |
英文摘要 |
the concept of subject in Kant's philosophy has so far only been regarded as a transcendental functional one, i.e. the reason. But the full comprehension of Kant's concept of subject needs the other dimension of it. This dimension is the one of substantiality, i.e. the individual. So the transcendental subject and individual subject constitute the two dimensions of Kant's concept of subject. The former is the open wire, and the latter is the dark one. Although the latter was spurned by Kant, we still argued that it is the indispensable component of Kant's concept of subject, because it exerts far-reaching influence on the inclination of Kant's subject. The successors of Kant's philosophers did not think much of this dark line, however, they developed this concept in the direct of dimension of transcendental subject,, the result of which is to put it to the extreme .Thus arose the problem of absolute subjectivism in modern philosophy. |
主题分类 |
人文學 >
人文學綜合 |
参考文献 |
|