神經科學與還原論議題

Neurosciences and the Reductionist Issue

10.7065/MRPC.200806.0073

Bernard Feltz；陳文祥(Wen-Hsiang Chen)

艾德曼 ； 神經群進化論 ； 還原論 ； 神經科學 ； 自由意志 ； Gerald Edelman ； Theory of Neuronal Group Selection ； Reductionism ； Neuroscience ； Free Will

哲學與文化

35卷6期（2008 / 06 / 01）

73 - 88

繁體中文

神經科學的歷史傾向於在人類行為中拒絕自由意志的可能性。然而，近來的理論卻開啟了與自由意志共存的說法。特別是艾德曼(Gerald Edelman)的「神經群進化論」似乎更在這個意義下開啟了這樣的視野。我打算一開始即呈現這樣科學理論，其次我將會用哲學分析來處理這個理論。首先是處理科學哲學的還原論問題，其次是探討哲學史上不同的靈魂概念。第三，我將會對這樣的人類學提出理論詮釋。全面性的視野就是要顯示最近浮現的神經科學與理論考察之間的兼容並存。

In the history of the neurosciences, there was a tendency to reject the possibility of free will in human behavior. However, recent theories open the possibility of compatibility with such free will. Specifically, the Theory of Neuronal Group Selection by Gerald Edelman seems to open perspectives in this sense. I will first present the scientific theory. Secondly, I will confront the science with philosophical analyses, first with the question of reductionism in philosophy of science and second with different concepts of the soul in the history of philosophy. Third, I will propose a theological interpretation of such an anthropology. The global perspective is to show the recent emergence of a compatibility between neurosciences and theological considerations.

1. Changeux, J.P.,Courrège, P.,Danchin, A.(1973).A theory of the epigenesis of neural networks by selective stabilization of synapses.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA,70,2974-2978.
2. Changeux, J.P.,Danchin, A.,Morin, E.,Piatelli, M.(1974).L`unite de l`homme 2 Le cerveau humain.Paris:Seuil.
3. Crick, F.(1966).Of Molecules and Men.Seattle:University of Washington Press.
4. Crick, F.(1994).The Astonishing Hypothesis: the Scientific Search for the Soul.Simon and Schuster.
5. Edelman, G(1994).Bright Air, Brillant Fire: On the Matter of Mind.New York:Basic Books.
6. Edelman, G(1987).Neural Darwinism. The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection.New York:Basic Books.
7. Edelman, G(1989).The Remembered Present. A Biological Theory of Consciousness.New York:Basic Books.
8. Feltz, B.(2000).L`inné et l`acquis dans les neurosciences contemporaines.Rev. Phil. de Louv..
9. Feltz, B.(1995).Le réductionnisme en biologie. Approche historique et épistémologique.Rev. Phil. Louv.,93,9-32.
10. Feltz, B.,Crommelinck, M.,Goujon, Ph.(1999).dir. de pub., Auto-organisation et emergence dans les sciences de la vie.Ousia, Bruxelles.
11. Feltz, B.,Feltz, B.,Lambert, D.(1994).dir. de pub. Entre le corps et l`esprit.Mardaga, Liege.
12. Ladrière, J.(1973).Vie sociale et destinee.Duculot, Gembloux.
13. Mayr, E.(1982).The Growth of Biological Thought. Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance.The Bellknap Press of Harvard Univerrsity Press.
14. Nagel, E.(1974).The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Explanation.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
15. Penrose, R.(1989).The Emperor`s New Mind. Concerning Computers, Minds and The Laws of Physics.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
16. Rosenberg, A.(1985).The Structure of Biological Science.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
17. Wilson, E.O.(1978).On Human Nature.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
18. Wright, L.,Functions,Grene, M.,Mendelsohn, E. (eds)(1976).Topics in Philosophy of Biology.Reidel, Dordrecht.

1. 陳文祥(2013)。意識、演化與創化論。哲學與文化，40(4)，61-78。
2. 陳文祥(2022)。意識與AI。Journal of Data Analysis，17(4)，5-18。