题名

現代繪畫詮釋與柏格森哲學研究-以奧菲主義之德洛內爲例

并列篇名

The Bergsonian Interpretation of Modern Painting-Robert Delaunay of Orphism for Example

DOI

10.7065/MRPC.200807.0161

作者

尤昭良(Chao-Liang Calvin Yu)

关键词

野獸主義 ; 立體主義 ; 綿延風格 ; 未來主義 ; 奧菲主義 ; 柏格森 ; 現代繪畫 ; 柏格森風格 ; Orphism ; Bergsonian style ; Cubism ; Durée style ; Futurism

期刊名称

哲學與文化

卷期/出版年月

35卷7期(2008 / 07 / 01)

页次

161 - 182

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文是以位居上個世紀之交(1889-1914)法國文化核心人物之一:柏格森(Henri Bergson)生命哲學的角度,去詮釋同一時期現代繪畫的研究計劃之一部分。該研究初始於筆者有關「現代繪畫之父」塞尚(Paul Cézanne)與柏格森之間的實質對比研究;隨後,亦已分別地探討了後繼的藝術運動:野獸主義(Fauvism, 1905)、立體主義(Cubism, 1907)、韻律主義(Rhythmism, 1909)與未來主義(Futurism, 1909)之代表性藝術家於理論與創作裡的柏格森哲學質素。 本文再續其論旨,以形上學裡「表象與實在」暨知識論裡「直覺與理智」之分析進路,探討立體主義之旁支奧菲主義(Orphism, 1912)之代表性藝術家:德洛內(Robert Delaunay)的「柏格森風格」。希望由此前後密切相關的研究,得以進一步論述現代繪畫與柏格森哲學,在同一文化氛圍與意義體系中互動與發展的情形;以及在此一詮譯架構下,現代繪畫的多重藝術風貌;以有別於目前一般較著重形式或作品分析的論述。

英文摘要

Henri Bergson's philosophy shares great importance in the late 19(superscript th) and early 20(superscript th) centuries in French. This is the point of departure I will take in this article, which constitutes the third part of my modern painting research. The first part of the research started from the issue regarding Cézanne and Bergson. While the second part regarding representatives of Cézanne's successors: Fauvism, Cubism and Rhythmism was also probed. On these grounds and under the same direction, this article moves forward for further research. Namely, I will take the similar approach to interpret Robert Delaunay of Orphism (a section of Cubism). With these I will show the multiple styles of modern art with Bergsonian viewpoints. Consequently, a principal characteristic of early 20(superscript th) century European painting could better be interpreted as the multiple formal expressions and innovative developments of ”Bergsonian style”, or the crystallization of Bergsonian spiritual-positivism.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
参考文献
  1. 尤昭良(2005)。現代繪畫詮釋與柏格森哲學研究-以馬諦斯等人爲例。哲學與文化,12
    連結:
  2. 尤昭良(2005)。立體主義與柏格森哲學-以梅津杰爲例。哲學與文化,5
    連結:
  3. ANTLIFF, Robert Mark(1993).Inventing Bergson: Cultural Politics and The Parisian Avant-garde.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  4. ANTLIFF, Robert,LEIGHTEN, Patricia(2001).Cubism and Culture.New York:Thames and Hudson.
  5. BECK, George(1975).Movement and Reality: Bergson and Cubism.The Structurist,15,109-116.
  6. BERGSON, Henri,Arthur Mitchell (trans.)(1943).Creative Evolution.New York:The Modern Library.
  7. BISTIS, Marguerite(1989).Bergsonian in The Bell Epoque.Ann Arbor:UMI Researcher Press.
  8. BOCCIONI, Umberto(1973).Futurist Manifestos.London:Thames and Hudson.
  9. BREUNIG, Leroy C. (ed.)(1972).Apollinaire on Art, Essays and Reviews, 1902-1918.Boston:MFA.
  10. BUCKBERROUGH, Sherry(1985).Orphism: The Discovery of Simultaneity.Ann Arbor:UMI Researcher.
  11. DAVIES, Ivor(1975).Western European Art Forms Influenced by Nietzsche and Bergson before 1914, Particularly Italian Futurism and French Orphism.Art International,19(3),49-55.
  12. Delaunay, Robert,Sonia(1978).The New Art of Color: The Writings of Robert and Sonia Delaunay.New York:The Viking Press.
  13. GROGIN, Robert Charles(1988).The Bergsonian Controversy in France, 1900-1914.Calgary:The University of Calgary Press.
  14. PETRIE, Brian(1974).Boccioni and Bergson.The Burlington Magazine,116,140-147.
  15. SPATE, Virginia(1979).Orphism: The Evolution of Non-Figurative Painting in Paris, 1910-1914.New York:Oxford University Press.
  16. SPATE, Virginia,Nikos Stangos(edited)(1981).Concepts of Modern Art.London:Thames and Hudson.
  17. 尤昭良(2003)。塞尚與柏格森。台北:高談。
  18. 吳康(1966)。柏格森哲學。台北:商務。
  19. 柏格森著、張東蓀譯(1976)。創造進化論。台北:環華。
  20. 柏格森著、張東蓀譯(1976)。物質與記憶。台北:先知。
  21. 柏格森著、潘梓年譯(1976)。時間與自由意志。台北:先知。
被引用次数
  1. 尤昭良(2010)。杜象藝術與柏格森哲學。哲學與文化,37(6),127-153。