杜象藝術與柏格森哲學

Duchamp and Bergson-A Contrast Study

10.7065/MRPC.201006.0127

尤昭良(Chao-Liang Calvin Yu)

立體主義 ； 未來主義 ； 杜象 ； 現代繪畫 ； 柏格森風格 ； 綿延風格 ； 現成物 ； Bergsonian style ； Cubism ； Durée style ； Futurism ； Duchamp ； Rhythmism ； Orphism ； Ready-made

哲學與文化

37卷6期（2010 / 06 / 01）

127 - 153

繁體中文

本文是以柏格森(Henri Bergson)生命哲學的角度，去詮釋同一時期現代繪畫的研究計劃之一部分。該研究初始於筆者有關「現代繪畫之父」塞尚與柏格森之間的實質對比研究；隨後，亦已分別地探討了後繼的藝術運動：野獸主義、立體主義、韻律主義、未來主義與奧菲主義的之代表性藝術家於理論與創作裡的柏格森哲學質素。 本文再續其論旨，以形上學裡「表象與實在」暨知識論裡「直覺與理智」之分析進路，探討重要藝術家：杜象(Marcel Duchamp)的「柏格森風格」。希望由此前後密切相關的研究，得以進一步論述現代繪畫與柏格森哲學，在同一文化氛圍與意義體系中互動與發展的情形；以及在此一詮譯架構下，現代繪畫的多重藝術風貌；以有別於目前一般較著重形式或作品分析的論述。

Henri Bergson's philosophy shares great importance in the late 19(superscript th) and early 20(superscript th) centuries in French. This is the point of departure I will take in this article, which constitutes the third part of my modern painting research. The first part of the research started from the issue regarding Cézanne and Bergson. While the second part regarding representatives of Cézanne's successors: Fauvism, Cubism, Rhythmism, Futurism and Orphism were also probed. On these grounds and under the same direction, this article moves forward for further research. Namely, Ⅰ will take the similar approach to interpret Marcel Duchamp's art. With these Ⅰ will show the multiple styles of modern art with Bergsonian viewpoints. Consequently, a principal characteristic of early 20(superscript th) century European painting could better be interpreted as the multiple formal expressions and innovative developments of ”Bergsonian style”, or the crystallization of Bergsonian spiritual-positivism.

1. 尤昭良(2008)。現代繪畫詮釋與柏格森哲學研究─以德洛內為例。哲學與文化，35(7)，91-106。
   連結：
2. 尤昭良(2005)。立體主義與柏格森哲學─以梅津傑為例。哲學與文化，32(5)，29-42。
   連結：
3. Bergson. An Introduction to Metaphysics (1903). authorized translation by T. E. Hulme. London: Collier Macmillan; New York: Macmillan Publishing, 1913.
4. Bergson. Creative Evolution (1907). Arthur Mitchell trans. New York: The Modern Library, 1943.
5. Bergson. Le Rire (1900). authorized translation by Cloudesley Brereton and Fred Rothwell. Laughter. London: Macmillan, 1911.
6. Antliff, Robert Mark(1993).Inventing Bergson: Cultural Politics and The Parisian Avant-garde.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
7. Beier, Lucia(1976).The Time Machine: A Bergsonian Approach to The Large Glass, Le Grand Verre.Gazette des Beaux-arts,6(88),194-200.
8. Cabanne, Pierre,Padgett, Ron (trans.)(1971).Dialogues with Marcel Duchamp.London:Thames and Hudson.
9. Davies, Ivor(1979).New Reflection on The Large Glass, The Most Logical Sources for Marcel Duchamp's Irrational Work.Art History,2(1),85-94.
10. Fry, Edward F.(1966).Cubism.London:Thames and Hudson.
11. Grey, Christopher(1953).Cubist Aesthetics Theories.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins Press.
12. Henderson, Linda Dalrymple(1998).Duchamp in Context, Science and Technology in The Large Glass and Related Works.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
13. Paul, Nancy Margaret(trans.),Palmer, W. Scott(trans.)(1970).Matter and Memory.London:George Allen & Unwin.
14. Poggi, Christine(1992).Defiance of Painting: Cubism, Futurism and The Invention of Collage.New Haven:Yale University Press.
15. Pogson, F. L. (trans.)(1971).Time and Free Will. An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness.London:George Allen & Unwin.
16. Sanouillet, Michel (ed.),Peterson, Elmer (ed.)(1973).The Writings of Marcel Duchamp.New York:Da Capo Press.
17. Tomkins, Calvin(1996).Duchamp: A Biography.New York:Henry Holt.
18. Villa, Theodore F.(1998).Marcel Duchamp and The Utopian Philosophies of Peter Kropotkin and Henri Bergson.UMI Research Press.
19. 尤昭良(2003)。塞尚與柏格森。臺北:高談。
20. 吳康(1966)。柏格森哲學。臺北:商務。
21. 柏格森、徐繼曾譯(1992)。笑：論滑稽的意義。臺北:商鼎。
22. 柏格森、張東蓀譯(1976)。物質與記憶。臺北:先知。
23. 柏格森、張東蓀譯(1976)。創造進化論。臺北:環華。
24. 柏格森、潘梓年譯(1976)。時間與自由意志。臺北:先知。

1. (2022)。在行動中進化：柏格森哲學的直觀。政治大學哲學學報，48，1-29。