中西智辯派比較

Comparative Research between the Chinese Dialecticians and the Western Sophists

10.7065/MRPC.201008.0023

孫中原(Zhong-Yuan Sun)

辯者智者 ； 比較 ； 思維 ； 論證 ； 邏輯 ； 哲學 ； 文化 ； Sophists ； Dialecticians ； Comparative Research ； Thinking ； Argument ； Logic ； Philosophy ； Culture

哲學與文化

37卷8期（2010 / 08 / 01）

23 - 38

繁體中文

中西智辯派是世界邏輯史領域的兩朵奇花。奇辭怪說的表達方式，雙重論證的思維模式，歸謬反駁的論證方式，是二者的共同點。智辯派學說是邏輯的前導和刺激，邏輯是智辯派學說的清理與昇華。智辯派學說和邏輯的對立統一，是邏輯發展的動力。分析智辯派學說與邏輯的矛盾滲透，揭示邏輯發展的機制和規律，有重要的哲學與文化意義。

Both Chinese Dialecticians and Western Sophists are wonderful work in the history of logic in the world. They are same in paradox expression of speech, double arguments in thinking way, and reductio ad absurdum argument to refute way. The doctrine of the Dialecticians and the Sophists is a precursor and stimulate to logic, and logic is a screening, modification and sublimation to their doctrine. The unity of opposites between the Dialecticians' and Sophists' theory and logic provides a driving force for development to logic. There are important philosophical and cultural significance to analyse the contradiction between the Dialecticians' and Sophists', theory and logic to reveal the mechanisms and laws of logical development.

1. 威廉•涅爾、瑪莎•涅爾(1985)。邏輯學的發展。北京:商務印書館。
2. 孫中原(1999)。中國邏輯學。臺北:水牛出版社。
3. 孫中原(1998)。詭辯與邏輯名篇賞析。臺北:水牛出版社。