「性有定體」的理論回歸點：評析顧憲成對「朱陸異同」與「朱王異同」的調和策略

"Xing You Ding Ti" as the Theoretical Return-A Critique of Gu Xian-Cheng's Reconciliatory Strategy of "The Similarities and Dissimilarities between Zhu and Lu" and "The Similarities and Dissimilarities between Zhu and Wang"

10.7065/MRPC.201210.0067

蔡龍九(Lung-Chiu Tsai)

朱陸異同 ； 朱王異同 ； 人生的價值理想 ； 理論的形構 ； 性有定體 ； "the similarities and dissimilarities between Zhu and Lu" ； "the similarities and dissimilarities between Zhu and Wang" ； the values and ideals of life ； the construction of theory ； Xing You Ding Ti

哲學與文化

39卷10期（2012 / 10 / 01）

67 - 89

繁體中文

本文討論「朱陸異同」與「朱王異同」在顧憲成的調和模式中，展現出哪些用意。第一，憲成對「朱陸王異同」採取「大方向」的調和，對理論細部差異著墨甚低。第二，憲成的此種「大方向」調和策略，事實上內含一「人生的價值理想」與「理論的形構」之回歸。然此「人生的價值理想」即「道德實踐」，「理論的形構」則屬「性體」。再探究後發現，陽明學的某些內涵對憲成來說容易撼動此「人生的價值理想」因此提出「性有定體」這一理論上的核心作為回歸。因此在「朱陸異同」與「朱王異同」兩大議題下，憲成有著明顯修正王學的意識卻不批評陸象山。最後，本文雖認為憲成這樣的調和模式雖屬簡化也效用有限，但仍可清楚的說明他的用意與考量為何。

This paper aims to evaluate the significance of ”the similarities and dissimilarities between Zhu and Lu” and ”the similarities and dissimilarities between Zhu and Wang” in Gu Xian-Cheng's strategic reconciliation. To begin with, ”the similarities and dissimilarities among Zhu, Liu and Wang” is assimilated into a general assumption, and little attention is paid to their differences in details Moreover, such strategy involves a return to ”the central value” and ”the core of theory”-the former means ”moral practice,” while the latter refers to ”Xing Ti” (essential good).After Gu Xian-Cheng's further explorations, he finds out that some principles of Wang Yang-Ming results in the disintegration of such central value, so he proposes the theory of ”Xing You Ding Ti” (essential good) to cohere these discrepancies . Thus, concerning the issues of ”the similarities and dissimilarities between Zhu and Lu” and ”the similarities and dissimilarities between Zhu and Wang,” Gu Xian-Cheng demonstrates an overt intent to amend Wang Yang-Ming's doctrines while obviating any critique on Liu Xiang-Shan. Finally, this paper suggests that such strategy is simplified and with limited effect, but vividly expresses Gu Xian-Cheng's purposes and considerations.

1. （宋）朱熹(2000).朱子文集.臺北:德富文教基金會.
2. （宋）陸象山(1974).陸象山全集.臺北:世界書局.
3. （明）王陽明(2006).王陽明全集.上海:上海古籍出版社.
4. （明）顧志成(1975).小心齋劄記.臺北:廣文書局.
5. （明）顧志成(1986).涇皋藏稿.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
6. （明）顧志成(1997).績修鬨四庫全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
7. 古清美(2004).願涇陽、高景逸思想之比較研究.臺北:大安出版社.
8. 牟宗三(2003).宋明哲學的問題與發展.臺北:聯經出版社.
9. 牟宗三(2003).心體與性體(一).臺北:聯合報系文化基金白.
10. 牟宗三(2004).新編中國哲學史(三下).臺北:三民書局.
11. 牟宗三(2003).圓善論.臺北:聯合報系文化基金會.
12. 勞思光(1997).新編中國哲學史(三上).臺北:三民書局.
13. 錢穆(1991).中國學術思想始論叢(七).臺北:束大書局.