题名 |
歌德的夏鬱:世界文學與文學普世性的反思 |
并列篇名 |
Melancholia goetheana: Some Reflections about Universal Literature and World-literature |
作者 |
薛佛(Jean-Marie Schaeffer);林志明(Chi-Ming Lin) |
关键词 |
歌德 ; 比較文學 ; 世界文學 ; 普世文學 ; Goethe ; Comparative Literature ; World Literature (Weltliteratur) ; Universal Literature (Universalliteratur) |
期刊名称 |
哲學與文化 |
卷期/出版年月 |
41卷11期(2014 / 11 / 01) |
页次 |
23 - 38 |
内容语文 |
繁體中文 |
中文摘要 |
近十多年來,歌德提出的「世界文學」問題又再度成為文學研究的當前議題,尤其是在比較文學領域之中。但今日歷史的、地緣政治的及經濟的語境,顯然和歐洲十八、十九世紀之交的語境大不相同。我們所生活的是後殖民、多元文化、多極政治及經濟全球化的語境,而這和持歐洲中心觀點的歌德所處在的世界顯然不同。就此而言,大部份有關普世文學的當代思考是具爭論性的。本文針對歌德的世界文學意念以及其浪漫主義近親、普世文學(Universalliteratur)的意念進行辯護。本文將著重於其中隱含的的世界主義及人類學元素,並嘗試指出它們並不像我們所曾以為地那樣單純。 |
英文摘要 |
Since some decades the goethean question of "Weltliteratur" is again on the agenda of literary studies and especially comparative literature. But the historical, geo-political and economical contexts of today have apparently nothing in common with the European context characterizing the turn of the XVIIIth to the XIXth century. We are living in a post-colonial, multicultural, politically multi-centered and economically globalized context which seems very different from the « eurocentric » view of the goethean world. So most of contemporary reflections about Universal Literature are polemical. I would like to say some words in defense of the goethean notion of "Weltliteratur" as well as of its romantic cousin of "Universalliteratur": I shall foreground their cosmopolitical and anthropological components and try to show that they were much less naive than we believe them to have been. |
主题分类 |
人文學 >
人文學綜合 |
参考文献 |
|