儒家價值論述及其當代意涵：市場經濟全球化脈絡下的分析

On Confucian Value Discourses and Their Contemporary Significances-An Analysis Based on the Context of Market Economy Globalization

陳文政(Wen-Cheng Chen)；許禎元(Chen-Yuan Hsu)

儒家價值論述 ； 市場經濟 ； 誘因排擠效應 ； 內在動機 ； 外在動機 ； Confucian Value Discourses ； Market Economy ； Crowding out Effect of Incentive ； Intrinsic Motivation ； Extrinsic Motivation

哲學與文化

42卷9期（2015 / 09 / 01）

129 - 164

繁體中文

本文旨在探討儒家價值論述及其當代意涵，並將其置於市場經濟全球化脈絡下來分析。首先分析外在動機導向的市場經濟邏輯，並以實證經驗資料例證市場經濟中「誘因排擠效應」之存在。在此基礎上，本文隨即針對市場經濟種種預設的瑕疵，以及誘因排擠效應對個人與社會所潛藏的種種貽害，加以分析批判。其次，探析具有內在動機導向的儒家相關價值論述，並歸納為「自我實現」、「公共責任」與「道德關懷」等三大主要內涵。接著，本文將進而分析這些儒家相關價值論述在當代市場經濟脈絡下的重要意涵。分析結果顯示，儒家價值論述因具有內在動機導向，對於市場經濟社會的動機失衡，可以發揮平衡作用。同時，儒家價值論述對於修補市場經濟種種弊害，能發揮正面價值。最後，在結語中本文強調內在動機的增強乃是社會的長遠價值，吾人應該加以重視。

This paper aims to delve into the Confucian value discourses and their contemporary significances in the context of globalizing market economy. First, it tries to explain the logic of market economy, which is extrinsic motivation oriented, and to illustrate the existence of ＂crowding out effect of incentive＂ in that logic by providing some empirical data. Based on these descriptions, this paper makes some critical analyses on the logics of market economy and ＂crowding out effect of incentive＂. Second, the authors depict the Confucian value discourses and divide them into three parts, namely, self-actualization discourse, public duty discourse, and moral concern discourse. Then, it situates the Confucian value discourses within the context of globalizing market economy and tries to illuminate their significances. This paper argues that, on the one hand, the Confucian value discourses, as a whole, could be used as a balancing tool to control the tilting situation of motivation system in globalizing market economy society; on the other hand, each part of the Confucian value discourses may produce positive impact on repairing the damages resulting from market economy. Finally, the authors make some concluding remarks.

1. 葉仁昌(2011)。孟子政治思想中義利之辨的分析：四種主要類型的探討。政治科學論叢，50，1-36。
   連結：
2. 葉仁昌(2006)。先秦儒家的財富思想。人文及社會科學集刊，18(3)，473-500。
   連結：
3. Maslow, A. H. "A Theory of Human Motivation," Psychological Review 50(1943): 370-396
4. (2012)。儒家與現代政治。臺北:聯經。
5. Ahdieh, Robert B.(2013).Reanalyzing Cost-Benefit Analysis: Toward A Framework of Function(s) and Form(s).New York University Law Review,88(6),1983-2073.
6. Allcott, Hunt,Mullainathan, Sendhil,Taubinsky, Dmitry(2014).Energy Policy with Externalities and Internalities.Journal of Public Economics,112,72-88.
7. Angle, Stephen C.(2012).Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy.Cambridge, U.K.:Polity Press.
8. Araujo, Robert John(2014).The Law as a Moral Enterprise.Loyola University Chicago Law Journal,46,293-311.
9. Atiq, Emad H.(2014).Why Motives Matter: Reframing the Crowding out Effect of Legal Incentives.The Yale Law Journal,123,1070-1176.
10. Audi, Robert(2015).Intuition and Its Place in Ethics.Journal of American Philosophical Association,1(1),57-77.
11. Bayefsky, Rachel(2014).Dignity as a Value in Agency Cost-Benefit Analysis.The Yale Law Journal,123,1732-1872.
12. Bell, Daniel A.(2010).Reconciling Socialism and Confucianism?: Reviving Tradition in China.Dissent,57(1),91-99.
13. Bickel, Alexander M.(1986).The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics.New Haven:Yale University Press.
14. Bubb, Ryan,Pildes, Richard H.(2014).How Behavioral Economics Trims Its Sails and Why.Harvard Law Review,127,1593-1678.
15. Calo, Ryan(2014).Digital Market Manipulation.George Washington Law Review,82(4),995-1051.
16. Chafetz, Josh(2011).The Political Animal and the Ethics of Constitutional Commitment.Harvard Law Review Forum,124,1-12.
17. Coleman, Jules L.(2014).Markets, Methods, Morals and the Law.Alabama Law Review,66(1),169-202.
18. Colombatto, Enrico(2014).A Free-Market View on Accidents and Torts.Law and Contemporary Problems,77(2),117-133.
19. Eichner, Maxine(2015).The Family, In Context.Harvard Law Review,128,1980-2016.
20. Fan, Ruiping(2010).Reconstructiomst Confucianism: Rethinking Morality after the West.New York:Springer.
21. Fehr, Erast,Falk, Armin(2002).Psychological Foundation of Incentives.European Economic Review,46,687-724.
22. Fehr, Erast,Rockenbach, Bettina(2003).Detrimental Effects of Sanctions on Human Altruism.Nature,422(13),137-140.
23. Feldman, Yuval(2011).The Complexity of Disentangling Intrinsic and Extrinsic Compliance Motivations: Theoretical and Empirical Insights from the Behavioral Analysis of Law.Washington University Journal of Law & Policy,35,11-51.
24. Ferguson, Andrew Guthrie(2015).Big Data and Predictive Reasonable Suspicion.University of Pennsylvania Law Review,163(2),327-410.
25. Frey, Bruno S.,Oberholzer-Gee, Felix(1997).The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis Motivation Crowding Out.American Economic Review,87(4),746-755.
26. Frey, Bruno S.,Oberholzer-Gee, Felix,Eichenberger, Reiner(1996).The Old Lady Visits Your Backyard: A Tale of Morals and Markets.Journal of Political Economy,104(6),1297-1313.
27. Ginsburg, Tom,Masur, Jonathan S.,McAdams, Richard H.(2014).Libertarian Paternalism, path Dependence, and Temporary Law.The University of Chicago Law Review,81,291-359.
28. Gneezy, Uri,Rustichini, Aldo(2000).Pay enough or Don't Pay at All.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,115(3),791-810.
29. Gu, Zhengkun(2012).Confucian Family Values as Universal Values in the 21st Century: Family-Nation-World.Chinese History and Society,41,43-62.
30. Herrnstein, R.J.,Loewenstein, George,Prelec, Drazen,Vaughan, William(1993).Utility Maximization and Melioration: Internalities in Individual Choice.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,6(3),149-185.
31. Hsu, Shi-Ling(2014).Capital, Rigidities, Latent Externalities.Houston Law Review,51(3),719-779.
32. Huntington, Clare(2015).Postmarital Family Law: A Legal Structure for Nonmarital FAmilies.Stanford Law Review,67,167-240.
33. Korobkin, Russel(2014).Comparative Effectiveness Research as Choice Architecture: The Behavioral Law and Economics Solution to the Health CAre Cost Crisis.Michigan Law Review,112,523-574.
34. Leither, Brian(2013).The Boundaries of the Moral (and Legal) Community.Alabama Law Review,64(3),511-531.
35. Macey, Jonathan R.(2013).Crony Capitalism: Right Here, Right Now.Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy,37(1),5-9.
36. Michaels, Jon D.(2015).Running Government Like a Business...Then and Now.Harvard Law Review,128,1152-1182.
37. Nagy, Donna M.(2015).The Costs of Mandatory Cost-Benefit Analysis in SEC Rulemaking.Arizona Law Review,57(1),129-160.
38. Sandel, Michael(2012).What Money Can't Buy-The Moral Limits of Markets.London:Allen Lane.
39. Sandholtz, Wayne,Taagepera, Rein(2005).Corruption, Culture, and Communism.International Review of Sociology,15(1),109-131.
40. Sun, Lisa Grow,Daniels, Brigham(2014).Mirrored Externalities.Notre Dame Law Review,90(1),135-185.
41. Sunstein, Cass R.(2013).The Storrs Lectures: Behavioral Economics and Paternalism.The Yale Law Journal,122,1826-1899.
42. Sunstein, Cass R.(2014).The Real World of Cost-Benefit Analysis: Thirty-Six Questions (and Almost as Many Answers).Columbia Law Review,114,167-211.
43. Swan, Sarah(2015).Home Rules.Duke Law Journal,64,823-900.
44. Tay, Louis,Diener, Ed(2011).Needs and Subjective Well-being around the World.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,101(2),354-365.
45. Vandenbergh, Michael P.,Raimi, Kaitlin Toner,Gilligan, Jonathan M.(2014).Energy and Climate Change: A Climate Prediction Market.UCLA Law Review,61,1962-2017.
46. Wu, Yun,Bell, Daniel A.(2014).The Revival of Confucianism in an Age of Globalization: Towards a Critical Confucianism.The Journal of Multicultural Society,5(1),1-21.
47. 文崇一(1989)。中國人的價值觀。臺北:東大圖書。
48. 托瑪‧皮凱提、詹文碩譯、陳以禮譯(2014)。二十一世紀資本論。臺北:衛城。
49. 余英時(1986)。從價值系統看中國文化的現代意義。臺北:時報文化。
50. 李亦園編、楊國樞編(1971)。中國人的性格。臺北:中研院民族所。
51. 李明輝(2008)。儒家視野下的政治思想。臺北:臺大出版中心。
52. 許倬雲(2014)。現代文明的批判：剖析人類未來的困境。臺北:天下文化。
53. 陳文政(2015)。教育及經濟全球化脈絡下華人教師典範之自我形塑：認知與行為層次的分析。教育學報，43(2)
54. 陳弱水(2005)。公共意識與中國文化。臺北:聯經。
55. 黃光國(1988)。儒家思想與東亞現代化。臺北:巨流。
56. 楊君實編、杜念中編(1987)。儒家倫理與經濟發展。臺北:允晨文化。
57. 楊國榮(2009)。善的歷程：儒家價值體系研究。上海:華東師大出版社。
58. 劉國強(2004)。全球化發展與儒家價值教育的資源。教育學報，32(2)，1-37。
59. 蔡德貴(2004)。試論美國的儒家學派。中國人民大學學報，2004(5)，74-85。

1. 陳文政,莊旻達(2019)。當代自由民主的侷限：理論與制度層次之初步考察。哲學與文化，46(2)，5-32。