非意願的罪？：奧古斯丁早期意願哲學再思

Involuntary Sin? : Rethinking Augustine's Early Philosophy of Voluntas

花威(Wei HUA)

奧古斯丁 ； 福圖納圖斯 ； 意願 ； 非意願的罪 ； Augustine ； Fortunatus ； Voluntas ； Involuntary Sin

哲學與文化

44卷3期（2017 / 03 / 01）

173 - 188

繁體中文

奧古斯丁把意願劃分為始祖亞當墮落前和墮落後兩個階段。在與摩尼教徒福圖納圖斯的辯論中，他論證說，道德責任基於意願的自由決斷的自主性，不基於其方向的多樣性；即使人類的意願在亞當墮落後陷入了犯罪的必然性，但亞當及其後裔仍然可以出於決斷的自主性而犯罪，就不得不繼續承負自己的道德責任。「非意願的罪」是一個自相矛盾的概念，不能解釋奧古斯丁早期意願哲學中的理論變革。

Augustine divides voluntas into two stages, before the fall and after the fall of Adam. In the debate with Fortunatus the Manichee, Augustine argues that moral responsibility is based on the autonomy, but not on the alternatives of our free choice. That is, although human voluntas, after the fall of Adam, is plunged into the necessity of sin, Adam and all the descendents still sin by the autonomy of their own free choice, and therefore have to undertake the moral responsibility for the sin. The paper will show that ＂involuntary sin＂ is a self-contradictory concept, which doesn't elucidate the theoretical reformations in Augustine' early philosophy of voluntas.

1. Augustine. De vera religione.
2. Augustine. Contra Iulianum opus imperfectum.
3. Augustine. Contra Academicos.
4. Augustine. De fide et symbolo.
5. Possidius. Augustini vita.
6. Augustine. De duabus animabus.
7. Augustine. Ad Simplicianum.
8. Augustine. De libero arbitrio.
9. Augustine. Retractationes.
10. Augustine. Confessiones.
11. Augustine. De dono perseverantiae.
12. Augustine. Acta contra Fortunatum Manichaeum.
13. Alflatt, Malcolm(1974).The Development of the Idea of Involuntary Sin in St. Augustine.Revue des Etudes Augustiniennes,20,113-134.
14. Alflatt, Malcolm(1975).The Responsibility for Involuntary Sin in Saint Augustine.Recherches Augustiniennes,10,171-186.
15. Babcock, William(1988).Augustine on Sin and Moral Agency.The Journal of Religious Ethics,16,28-55.
16. Babcock, William(Ed.)(1990).Paul and the Legacy of Paul.Dallas:Southern Methodist University Press.
17. Brown, Peter(2000).Augustine of Hippo: A Biography. A new edition with an epilogue.Berkeley:University of California Press.
18. Chappell, T. D. J.(1995).Aristotle and Augustine on Freedom: Two Theories of Freedom, Voluntary Action and Akrasia.New York:St. Martin's Press.
19. Djuth, Marianne(1993).The Hermeneutics of De Libero Arbitrio III: Are There Two Augustines?.Studia Patristica,Leuven:
20. Eddy, Paul Rhodes(2009).Can a Leopard Change Its Spots? Augustine and the Crypto -Manichaeism Question.Scottish Journal of Theology,62,316-346.
21. Fredriksen, Paula(1979).Princeton University.
22. Harrison, Carol(2006).Rethinking Augustine's Early Theology: An Argument for Continuity.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
23. Harrison, Simon(2006).Augustine's Way into the Will: The Theological and Philosophical Significance of De Libero Arbitrio.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
24. O'Connell, Robert(1991).Involuntary Sin in the De Libero Arbitrio.Revue des Etudes Augustiniennes,37,23-36.
25. Prendiville, John G.(1972).The Development of the Idea of Habit in the Thought of Saint Augustine.Traditio,28,29-99.
26. Van Den Berg, Jacob(Ed.)(2011).Search of Truth: Augustine, Manichaeism and Other Gnosticism.Linden:Brill.
27. Van Oort, Johannes(2008).Heeding and Hiding Their Particular Knowledge? An Analysis of Augustine's Dispute with Fortunatus.Die Christlich-philosophischen Diskurse der Spätantike: Texte, Personen, Institutionen,Stuttgart:
28. Wetzel, James(1992).Augustine and the Limits of Virtue.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
29. 吳天嶽(2010)。意願與自由：奧古斯丁意願概念的道德心理學解讀。北京:北京大學出版社。
30. 周偉馳(2009)。奧古斯丁的基督教思想。北京:中國社會科學出版社。
31. 花威(2014)。意志的創造與墮落：奧古斯丁《論自由決斷》的內在統一。哲學門，28，31-54。