證據與探究－論證據主義的德性批判

Evidence and Inquiry-On Virtue Critique of Evidentialism

方紅慶(Hong-Qing FANG)

證據 ； 探究 ； 證成 ； 證據主義 ； 德性知識論 ； Evidence ； Inquiry ； Justification ； Evidentialism ； Virtue Epistemology

哲學與文化

44卷11期（2017 / 11 / 01）

135 - 151

繁體中文

我們應該靜態地看待證據，還是應該動態地考察證據與探究的過程？對於這個問題的不同回答構成了證據主義與德性知識論的根本分歧。證據主義堅持一種狹隘的證成觀，主張認知證成只涉及證據與信念的關係，與探究行為無關；德性知識論則遵循自然化知識論的思路考察信念的病原學，主張證據與探究應該獨立共存，並基於理智德性重塑信念證成（個人證成）與命題證成的關係，拓展了認知證成的本質內涵。總之，德性知識論成功地調和了傳統知識論與自然化知識論之間愈發尖銳衝突和對立。

Should we view our evidences statically, or investigate evidence and inquiry dynamically? It constitutes the fundamental differences between evidentialism and virtue epistemology. Evidentialists propose a narrow view of justification, and argue that epistemic justification only concerns the relationship between evidence and belief, and has nothing to do with inquiry. In contrast, virtue epistemologists argue that evidence and inquiry can coexist, and reshape the relation of doxastic (personal) justification and propositional justification based on intellectual virtue. All in all, virtue epistemology reconciles successfully the increasingly sharp conflict between traditional epistemology and naturalizing epistemology.

1. Dougherty, Trent. "Baehr on Evidence and Virtue: E-relevant or Irrelevent?," draft..
2. Axtell, Guy,Olson, Philip(2009).Three Independent Factors in Epistemology.Contemporary Pragmatism,6,89-109.
3. Baehr, Jason(2011).The Inquiring Mind.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
4. Bonjour, Larence,Sosa, Ernest(2004).Epistemic Justification: Internalism vs. Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues.MA:Blackwell.
5. Dougherty, Trent(2012).Reducing Responsibility: An Evidentialist Account of Epistemic Blame.European Journal of Philosophy,20,534-547.
6. Dougherty, Trent(2004).Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
7. Dougherty, Trent(2011).Evidentialism and its Discontents.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
8. Feldman, R.(2004).Epistemology.NJ:Prentice Hall.
9. Feldman, R.(2003).Chisholm's Internalism and its Consequence.Metaphilosophy,34,603-620.
10. Feldman, Richard,Conee, E.(1985).Evidentialsim.Philosophical Studies,48,15-34.
11. Feldman, Richard,Conee, E.(2005).Some Virtues of Evidentialism.Veritas,50,95-108.
12. Kornblith, Hilary(2003).Roderick Chisholm and the Shaping of American Epistemology.Metaphilosophy,34,582-602.
13. Kornblith, Hilary(1983).Justified Belief and Epistemically Responsive Action.The Philosophical Review,92,33-48.
14. Kornblith, Hilary(2003).Can Internalism be Saved?.Metaphilosophy,34,621-629.
15. Plantinga, Alvin(2000).Warranted Christian Belief.New York:Oxford University Press.
16. Reid, Thomas(1983).An Inquiry into the Mind on the Principle of Common Sense.Indianapolis:Hackett.
17. Steup, Matthias,Sosa, Ernest(2005).Contemporary Debates in Epistemology.Malden, MA:Blackwell.
18. Toulmin, Stephen(2001).Return to Reason.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
19. Turri, John(2001).On the Relationship between Propositional and Doxastic Justification.Philosophy and Phenomenology Research,LXXX,312-326.
20. 方紅慶(2014)。兩種德性知識論：爭論與融合。廈門大學學報（哲社版），226(6)，9-16。
21. 方紅慶(2014)。從奎因到索薩—論自然化知識論的德性轉向。科學技術哲學研究，31(1)，56-60。