题名

公共關切與政治審議-奧克肖特公民聯合思想的審議民主面向

并列篇名

Public Concern and Political Deliberation: A Deliberative Democratic Image of Oakeshott's Civil Association Theory

作者

李昊晟(Haosheng LI)

关键词

奧克肖特 ; 公民聯合 ; 審議民主 ; 公共關切 ; 政治審議 ; Oakeshott ; Civil Association ; Deliberative Democracy ; Public Concern ; Political Deliberation

期刊名称

哲學與文化

卷期/出版年月

46卷1期(2019 / 01 / 01)

页次

151 - 167

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

作為審議民主理論的兩個必要條件,政治平等與民主審議都可在奧克肖特公民聯合思想得以體現。在公民聯合體中,公共關切是把公民聯繫起來的道德紐帶,由非工具性規則構成,公民在言行中因共同遵守這些規則而擁有自由平等的道德地位;公民須承認合法政府制定的法規之權威,但這並不妨礙他們對法規的可欲性進行政治審議。公民聯合的政治審議是實踐判斷的運用,主要採取說服性論證,它緊扣著特定歷史脈絡並與對話政治相兼容。所以,奧克肖特公民聯合思想能夠呈現一種富有彈性與道德厚重感的審議民主面向。

英文摘要

Political equality and Demoractic deliberation, which are two necessary commitments of deliberative democracy theory, can be satisfied by Oakeshott's civil association theory. In a Civil association, Members (cives) are related each other by public concern composed of non-instrumental rules (lex), subscription to which embodies being free and equal; Cives are required to recognize the authority of lex enacted by legal government, but are permitted to criticize the desirability of them. Political deliberation in the Civil association is an application of practical judgment, which makes use of persuasive argumentation mainly, concerns a concrete historical context and could be compatible with Politics of Conversation. I conclude that a deliberative democratic image of civil association is flexible and includes a strong moral sense.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
参考文献
  1. 曾國祥(2011)。實證主義與政治理解的貧困——政治學方法論的反思。臺灣民主季刊,8(3)
    連結:
  2. Beiner, Ronald(2014).Political Philosophy: What It Is and Why It Matters.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  3. Benhabib, Seyla(ed.)(1996).Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political.Princeton:Preston University Press.
  4. Bohman, James(1996).Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy.Cambridge:The MIT Press.
  5. Dryzek, John(2003).Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations.Oxford:Oxford University.
  6. Dryzek, John,王大林(摘譯)(2005)。不同領域的協商民主。浙江大學學報(人文社會科學版),5
  7. Fishkin, James(2005).What is Deliberative Democracy.International Conference on Deliberative Democracy Handbook,Taipei:
  8. Franco, Paul(ed.),Marsh, Leslie(ed.)(2012).A Companion to Michael Oakeshott.University Park:Pennsylvania State University Press.
  9. Gutmann, Amy.,Thompson, Dennis(2004).Why Deliberative Democracy.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  10. Mapel, David(1990).Civil Association and the Idea of Contingency.Political Theory,18(3),392-410.
  11. Minch, Michael(2009).The Democratic Theory of Michael Oakeshott: Discourse, Contingency, and The Politics of Conversation.Exeter:Imprint Academic.
  12. Oakeshott, Michael(2014).Notebook: 1922-86.Exeter:Imprint Academic.
  13. Oakeshott, Michael(1975).On Human Conduct.New York:Oxford University Press.
  14. Oakeshott, Michael(2004).What is History and Other Essay?.Exeter:Imprint Academic.
  15. Oakeshott, Michael(1991).Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays.Indianapolis:Liberty Fund.
  16. Oakeshott, Michael (Ed.).(1953).The Social and Political Doctrines of Contemporary Europe.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  17. Oakeshott, Michael,Nardin, Terry(ed.)O'sullivan, Luke(ed.)(2006).Lectures in the History of Political Thought.Exeter:Imprint Academic.
  18. Pettit, Philip(2001).Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma.Philosophical Issue,11
  19. Plotica, Luke Philip(2012).Deliberation or Conversation: Michael Oakeshott on the Ethos and Conduct of Democracy.Northeastern Political Science Association,44(2)
  20. Young, Iris(2000).Inclusion and Democracy.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  21. 本傑明.巴伯,彭斌(譯),吳潤洲(譯)(2006).強勢民主.長春:吉林人民出版社.
  22. 何包鋼(2008).民主理論:困境與出路.北京:法律出版社.
  23. 李強斌,黃健榮(2012)。國外協商民主研究 30 年:協商民主何以須為何以可為。四川大學學報(哲學社會科學版),3
  24. 哈貝馬斯,童世駿(譯)(2014).在事實與規範之間:關於法律和民主法治國的商談理論.北京:三聯書店.
  25. 威爾.金利卡,劉莘(譯)(2004).當代政治哲學.上海:上海三聯出版社.
  26. 查特爾.墨菲,王恒(譯),臧佩洪(譯)(2001).政治的回歸.南京:江蘇人民出版社.
  27. 約翰.西蒙斯,郭為桂(譯),李豔麗(譯)(2009).道德原則與政治義務.南京:江蘇人民出版社.
  28. 陳思賢(2008).西洋政治思想史.現代英國篇.長春:吉林出版公司.
  29. 斯蒂芬.馬賽多,馬萬利(譯)(2010).自由主義美德:自由主義憲政中的公民身份、德性與社群.南京:譯林出版社.
  30. 曾國祥(2009).主體危機與理性批判——自由主義的保守詮釋.臺北:巨流圖書公司.
  31. 蔡英文(2006).主權國家與市民社會.北京:北京大學出版社.
  32. 談火生(選編)(2006).審議民主.南京:江蘇人民出版社.
  33. 邁克爾.奧克肖特,王加豐(譯),周旭東(譯)(2009).歷史是什麼.上海:上海財經大學出版社.