彌撒是否祭祀：明清之際被抑制話題之重新展開

Whether Missa is Sacrifice or Not: Research on a Restrained Topic in Late Ming and Early Qing Dynasty

王定安(Dingan WANG)

彌撒 ； 祭祀 ； 中道 ； 比較經學 ； Missa ； Sacrifice ； The Golden Mean / Zhong Yong ； Comparative Scripture

哲學與文化

46卷10期（2019 / 10 / 01）

103 - 120

繁體中文

明清之際關於中國祭禮之爭，反方以天主教彌撒來框定儒家祭禮，辯護者無力突破祭祀唯一合法性「對象」的藩籬，無奈地將彌撒與祭祀嚴格區隔為兩不相干之事。「彌撒是否祭祀」的話題，於同時期的歐洲仍在激烈地上演，在華因受到抑制未得以充分展開，如今重新考查，可以看出耶、儒祭祀之「方式」都體現出明顯的神聖性；祭祀「對象」所呈現的「臨在」、「如在」之別，無非是神、人關係的具體表現；神、經學系統之中道／中庸原則，都是以禮儀為標準，祭祀都是其中最為重要的部分。耶、儒兩種獨立自洽的祭祀系統之比較研究，具有重要意義與可行性。

During Chinese Rites Controversy on Sacrifices in Late Ming and Early Qing dynasty, the counterclaim judged Confucian sacrifices in the frame of Missa. While those defenders could not break through the bondage from the sole legitimate object of worship, therefore they had to separate Confucian sacrifices from Missa and claimed them irrelevant. While the topic ＂whether Missa is sacrifice or not＂ was under heated debated in Europe, it was restrained in China. Nowadays, from the perspective of ＂comparative scripture＂ research, we can see there was sanctity demonstrated both in the ＂mode＂ of Christianity and in Confucianism. As to the ＂object＂, the difference manifested as ＂real presence＂ and ＂as if presence＂, is just the demonstration of two kinds of relationships between gods and human being. We also can see both in the system of theology and the system of Confucian scripture, the points of the ＂Golden mean / Zhong yong＂ lie in rites, of which sacrifice is one of the most important part.

1. 王定安(2018)。天儒喪祭禮遭遇之辯中辨：儒家宗教性的比較詮釋。漢語基督教學術論評，6
   連結：
2. 晉．杜預注，唐．孔穎達正義，《春秋左傳正義》，清嘉慶二十年南昌府學重刊宋本十三經注疏本。
3. Benjamin, H. A Plain Account of the Nature and End of the Sacrament of the Lord’s-Supper. London: James, John, and Paul Knapton, 1735.
4. Dudink, A.(2007).The Holy Mass in Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century China: Introduction to and Annotated Translation of Manual for Attending Mass.A Lifelong Dedication to the China Mission: Essays Presented in Honor of Father Jeroom Heyndrickx, CICM, on the Occasion of His 75th Birthday and the 25th Anniversary of the F. Verbiest Institute K. U. Leuven,Leuven, Belgium:
5. Hubert, H.,Mauss, M.(1964).Sacrifice: Its Nature and Function.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
6. J. 沃特沃斯（編）,陳文海（譯註）(2012).特蘭特聖公會議教規教令集.北京:商務印書館.
7. Menegon, E.(2013).European and Chinese Controversies Over Rituals: A Seventeenth-Century Genealogy of Chinese Religion.Devising Order: Socio-religious Models, Rituals, and the Performativity of Practice,Leiden:
8. Mungello, D. E.(1994).The Chinese Rites Controversy: It’s History and Meaning.Nettetal:Steyler Verlag.
9. Richie, J. A Criticism upon Modern Notions of Sacrifices. London: C. Henderson, 1761.
10. Standaert, N.(2012).Chinese Voices in the Rites Controversy.Roma:Institutum Historicum Societatis Iesu.
11. Standaert, N.(2017).Early Sino-European Contacts and the Birth of the Modern Concept of ‘Religion’.Monumenta Serica Monograph Series LXVII/1,Sankt Augustin:
12. Strenski, I.(2003).Theology and the First Theory of Sacrifice.Leiden:Brill.
13. Tapie, M. A.(2012).Aquinas on Israel and the Church: A Study of the Question of Supersessionism in the Theology of Thomas Aquinas.Washington, D. C.:The Catholic University of America.
14. Thompson, N.(2005).Eucharistic Sacrifice and Patristic Tradition in the Theology of Martin Bucer 1534-1546.Leiden:Brill.
15. Watson, J. L.,Rawski, E. S.(1988).Death Ritual in Late Imperial and Modern China.London:University of California Press.
16. 方豪(2003).中國天主教史人物傳.上海:天主教上海教區光啟社.
17. 王定安(2016)。中國禮儀之爭中的儒家宗教性問題。學術月刊，7
18. 加爾文(2010).基督教要義.北京:生活．讀書．新知三聯書店.
19. 吉爾松,沈清松（譯）(2001).中世紀哲學精神.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
20. 朱熹，《家禮》，宋刻本。
21. 宋濂(1976).元史.北京:中華書局.
22. 李天綱(2017).金澤：江南民間祭祀探源.北京:生活．讀書．新知三聯書店.
23. 李天綱(1998).中國禮儀之爭：歷史、文獻和意義.上海:上海古籍出版社.
24. 李華偉(2018)。儒教的國教化與窄化——康有為的「逆宗教改革」與梁啟超的批判。探索與爭鳴，9
25. 周啟榮,毛立坤（譯）(2017).清代禮教主義的興起.天津:天津人民出版社.
26. 邱業祥(2017).自我與他者：經文辯讀視域中的理雅各《論語》譯解研究.北京:中國社會科學出版社.
27. 徐光啟,李之藻,楊筠,李天綱（編注）(2007).明末天主教三柱石箋注.香港:道風書社.
28. 張樹國,殷開正(2005)。詩經祝辭考。東方論壇，1
29. 脫脫(1977).宋史.北京:中華書局.
30. 陸世儀(1997).家祭禮.臺北:新文豐出版公司.
31. 費賴之,馮承鈞（譯）(1995).在華耶穌會士列傳及書目.北京:中華書局.
32. 聖母會會士編譯，《羅馬彌撒經本》，北京、上海：聖母會公教書籍編輯部，1938。
33. 聖多瑪斯．阿奎那,周克勤（譯）(2008).神學大全.臺南:碧岳學社.
34. 劉耘華(2014).依天立義.上海:上海古籍出版社.
35. 黎靖德，《朱子語類》，明成化九年陳煒刻本。
36. 鐘鳴旦(2012)。祭天儀式之「理論」。潘富恩教授八十壽辰紀念文集，上海:
37. 鐘鳴旦（編）,杜鼎克（編）(2002).耶穌會羅馬檔案館明清天主教文獻.臺北:臺北利氏學社.
38. 鐘鳴旦（編）,杜鼎克（編）,王仁芳（編）(2013).徐家匯藏書樓明清天主教文獻續編.臺北:利氏學社.
39. 鐘鳴旦（編）,杜鼎克（編）,蒙曦（編）(2009).法國國家圖書館明清天主教文獻.臺北:利氏學社.
40. 鐘鳴旦,何麗霞（譯）(1998).可親的天主：清初基督徒論「帝」談「天」.臺北:光啟出版社.