慷慨外推與多元他者：沈清松與中華新士林哲學

Vincent Shen's Philosophy of Generosity: Dao of Strangification toward Multiple Others and the Self-in-the-Making

劉千美(Johanna Liu)

沈清松 ； 慷慨外推 ； 多元他者 ； 形成中的自我 ； 中華新士林哲學 ； 贈予之德 ； Vincent Shen ； Generousity ； Strangification ； Many others/Multiple others ； Self-in-the-Making ； Chinese Neo-scholasticism ； Ethics of Gift

哲學與文化

46卷11期（2019 / 11 / 01）

37 - 50

繁體中文

建構與思考中華士林哲學的前景，是沈清松一生思想的核心議題之一。他認為當代中華士林哲學開端於晚明西方傳教士來華與中華文化相遇之際，既承襲西方中世紀以來存有學體系的思維，更受益於中華文化，尤其儒家思想，對人生命意義與道德實踐的關懷，以及道家利生的宇宙∕自然觀。對他而言，中華士林哲學的未來發展，不僅是理性思維的認知體系的建構問題，更在於以經驗作為可指向終極真實之存有的完成行動力的實踐。慷慨外推與多元他者，是沈清松作為當代中華士林哲學研究者，在朝向綿延不絕之意義所臨現之存在與具有多元文化性質的經驗主體的終極張力間，針對中西思想跨文化界域交談的可能性，所提出的理論與實踐之途。本文簡要摘述清松先生作為中華新士林哲學研究者和思維者，所提出的慷慨外推、多元他者、形成中的自我等核心概念的思想內涵，作為尋索隱匿在他已出版和未出版的文字間的思維的蹤跡。

Constructing and thinking the new visions of Chinese scholasticism is one of core issues Vincent Shen has concerned the most in his thought. Vincent Shen has assumed that it is in the period of late Ming, when European missionaries came to China, encountered with classical Chinese thought and culture, the philosophy of Chinese scholasticism started to emerge; having inherited the ontological thinking from Western medieval philosophy, Chinese scholasticism has been benefited as well from the Chinese philosophy of life, moral theory and practice of classical Confucianism and the cosmology of Daoism. Shen claims that the new visions of contemporary Chinese scholasticism consist not only in the epistemological construction of science, but also the experience as the practice of fulfilling being toward the Ultimate Reality. This article attempts to underscore the main themes Vincent Shen has significantly contributed to Chinese scholasticism, through reading the core concepts, generous stangification, many others/ multiple others, and self-in-the-making, found in his published and unpublished works, and to trace the thoughts lying dormant in his writings.

1. 沈清松(2012)。空間、山水與雲氣：對中國山水畫論與古代宇宙論的哲思。哲學與文化，39(11)，77-94。
   連結：
2. Aquinas,Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de veritate. q. 2 a. 3 arg. 19.
3. Derrida, J.(2000).Of Hospitality. Anne Dufourmantelle invites Jacques Derrida to respond.Stanfor:Stanford University Press.
4. Derrida, J.(1999).Adieu to Emmanuel Lévinas.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
5. Kearney, R(ed.),Dooley, M(ed.)(1998).Questioning Ethics: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy.London:Routledge.
6. Mauss, M.(1968).Essai sur le don, in Sociologie et anthropologie.Paris:Les Presses Universitaires de France.
7. Mauss, M.(1990).The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies.New York:Routledge.
8. Shen, Vincent(2018).Translatability, Strangification and Common Intelligibility: Taking Chinese Landscape Painting and Philosophical Texts as Example.Why Traditional Chinese Philosophy Still Matter?,New York:
9. Shen, Vincent(2015).Passivity and Generosity in Christian Mysticism and Chinese Spirituality.International Conference on Union with God: St. Teresa of Avila and Contemporary World,Hong kong:
10. Shen, Vincent(2013).Globalization, the Spirit of Christianity and Intercultural Dialogue-Towards and Ethics of Original Generosity and Strangification.Lumen, A Journal of Catholic Studies,1(1)
11. Shen, Vincent(2018).Daxue: The Great Learning for University Today.Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy,17(1)
12. 沈清松(2018).士林哲學與中國哲學.北京:商務印書館.
13. 沈清松(2004).對他者的慷慨：從外推精神看中華文化與基督宗教.香港:香港中文大學崇基學院.

1. 黃睿(2022)。《莊子》渾沌寓言的兒童哲學詮釋：差異倫理與多元他者的視角。哲學與文化，49(10)，79-99。
2. 林淑慧(2021)。生存處境的重構：殷海光旅遊敘事的文化批判。哲學與文化，48(9)，115-129。