题名

《韓非子》「知」概念的認知特徵

并列篇名

On Cognitive Trait of "Zhi" in the Hanfeizi

作者

朴榮雨(Youngwoo PARK)

关键词

《韓非子》 ; 知 ; 明 ; 認知 ; 法 ; 術 ; 勢 ; Hanfeizi ; Zhi (Knowledge) ; Ming (Clarity or Wisdom) ; Cognition ; Legal Principle ; Principle of Reward and Punishment ; Power of Government

期刊名称

哲學與文化

卷期/出版年月

47卷2期(2020 / 02 / 01)

页次

53 - 69

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

「知」」與「明」這個概念,在《韓非子》一書所用之關鍵詞中屬最多者。「明」在「法」、「術」、「勢」運用中達至高度「認知」狀態。其用詞諸如「明法」、「明君」、「明賞」、「法分明」、「明賞罰」、「明法術」、「明察」、「人主之不明」、「人主之明」等等。這些「明」是形容「知」的一種認知狀態,因此「明」有與君主必須具備的「知」概念不離寸步的關係。本文就扣緊《韓非子》「知」與「明」兩項概念繫為一組,並探討《韓非子》「知」概念所蘊含的認知特徵和其在《韓非子》整書中所佔的功能。據以討論《韓非子》「知」概念所涉及的對象和領域、擔任「知」概念之行動主體特色、「知」與「明」的關係等相關議題,依此而論證《韓非子》之所以為帝王之術之哲學意義。

英文摘要

Interestingly, word Zhi (knowledge) and Ming (clarity) was used most in the Hanfeizi. Ming was a highly cognitive-state of a king in his practical process of the Fa (law), Shu (statecraft) or two handles of chastisement and commendation, Shi (power of king). There are some concrete usage like Ming-fa (law as apparentness), Ming-jun (wisdom king), Ming-shang (commendation with apparentness), legal as apparentness, Mng-shangfa (chastisement and commendation with apparentness), Ming Fa-Shu (Law and statecraft with apparentness), Ming-cha (scrutinization), king's carelessness, king's carefulness, eta. These usage of Ming expressed a kind of cognitive degree in king's cognitive activity. So, the concept Ming had an undetachable relation to the concept Zhi (knowledge) that king must have necessarily. In this paper, I will bind the two concepts Zhi and Ming of Hanfeizi as a set, and examine cognitive traits and roles of Zhi in the Hanfeizi. Furthermore, discuss the object and scope of Zhi that Hanfeizi dealt with, subjective traits of Zhi in the acting subject, i.e., king, and will pursue an architecture on relation between concepts Zhi and Ming, thereby demonstrate a philosophical meaning of Hanfeizi as Kings-Learning.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
参考文献
  1. 李賢中(2005)。道德實踐中的權衡問題。哲學與文化,32(8)
    連結:
  2. (1986).唐君毅全集.臺北:臺灣學生書局.
  3. 《韓非子校注》組(編),周勛初(修訂)(2009).韓非子校注.南京:鳳凰出版社.
  4. A. N.懷特海,周邦憲(譯)(2007).符號的意義及效果.貴陽:貴州人民出版社.
  5. Harnad, Stevan(1990).The Symbol Grounding Problem.Physica D,42
  6. Kövecses, Zoltán(2006).Language, Mind, and Culture: A Practical Introduction.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  7. Lakoff, George,Johnson, Mark(2003).Metaphors We Live By.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
  8. Whitehead, Alfred North(1985).Symbolism: Its Meaning and Effect.New York:Fordham University Press.
  9. 王曉波(2016)。參之以人,驗之以物—論韓非的刑名之學。國學學刊,4
  10. 李源澄(2010).諸子概論.上海:華東師範大學出版社.
  11. 李增(2001).先秦法家哲學思想—先秦法家法理、政治、哲學.臺北:國立編譯館.
  12. 胡適(2001).中國哲學史大綱.石家莊:河北教育出版社.
  13. 梁啟雄(1997).韓子淺解.臺北:臺灣學生書局.
  14. 陳奇猷(1987).韓非子集釋.臺北:華正書局.
  15. 瀧川龜太郎(1986).史記會注考證.臺北:洪氏出版社.