英文摘要
|
Interestingly, word Zhi (knowledge) and Ming (clarity) was used most in the Hanfeizi. Ming was a highly cognitive-state of a king in his practical process of the Fa (law), Shu (statecraft) or two handles of chastisement and commendation, Shi (power of king). There are some concrete usage like Ming-fa (law as apparentness), Ming-jun (wisdom king), Ming-shang (commendation with apparentness), legal as apparentness, Mng-shangfa (chastisement and commendation with apparentness), Ming Fa-Shu (Law and statecraft with apparentness), Ming-cha (scrutinization), king's carelessness, king's carefulness, eta. These usage of Ming expressed a kind of cognitive degree in king's cognitive activity. So, the concept Ming had an undetachable relation to the concept Zhi (knowledge) that king must have necessarily. In this paper, I will bind the two concepts Zhi and Ming of Hanfeizi as a set, and examine cognitive traits and roles of Zhi in the Hanfeizi. Furthermore, discuss the object and scope of Zhi that Hanfeizi dealt with, subjective traits of Zhi in the acting subject, i.e., king, and will pursue an architecture on relation between concepts Zhi and Ming, thereby demonstrate a philosophical meaning of Hanfeizi as Kings-Learning.
|
参考文献
|
-
李賢中(2005)。道德實踐中的權衡問題。哲學與文化,32(8)
連結:
-
(1986).唐君毅全集.臺北:臺灣學生書局.
-
《韓非子校注》組(編),周勛初(修訂)(2009).韓非子校注.南京:鳳凰出版社.
-
A. N.懷特海,周邦憲(譯)(2007).符號的意義及效果.貴陽:貴州人民出版社.
-
Harnad, Stevan(1990).The Symbol Grounding Problem.Physica D,42
-
Kövecses, Zoltán(2006).Language, Mind, and Culture: A Practical Introduction.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
-
Lakoff, George,Johnson, Mark(2003).Metaphors We Live By.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
-
Whitehead, Alfred North(1985).Symbolism: Its Meaning and Effect.New York:Fordham University Press.
-
王曉波(2016)。參之以人,驗之以物—論韓非的刑名之學。國學學刊,4
-
李源澄(2010).諸子概論.上海:華東師範大學出版社.
-
李增(2001).先秦法家哲學思想—先秦法家法理、政治、哲學.臺北:國立編譯館.
-
胡適(2001).中國哲學史大綱.石家莊:河北教育出版社.
-
梁啟雄(1997).韓子淺解.臺北:臺灣學生書局.
-
陳奇猷(1987).韓非子集釋.臺北:華正書局.
-
瀧川龜太郎(1986).史記會注考證.臺北:洪氏出版社.
|