题名

直覺主義邏輯與反事實條件句

并列篇名

Intuitionistic Logic and Counterfactuals

作者

羅伊.T. 庫克(Roy T. COOK);李晽(Mao LI);劉葉濤(Yetao LIU)

关键词

威廉姆森 ; 反事實條件句 ; 經典邏輯 ; 直覺主義邏輯 ; 溯因論證 ; Williamson ; Counterfactuals ; Classical Logic ; Intuitionistic Logic ; Abductive Argument

期刊名称

哲學與文化

卷期/出版年月

47卷8期(2020 / 08 / 01)

页次

93 - 115

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

威廉姆森(Timothy Williamson)在《哲學的哲學》(The Philosophy of Philosophy)中就如何理解反事實條件句提出了一種反事實認識論,在這種理論的基礎上提出了一種經典邏輯樣式的模態理論,即經典模態邏輯T。基於對威廉姆森理論的扼要闡釋,從反事實認識論的直覺主義視角可以得出模態邏輯T的直覺主義版本;同時也可以參照威廉姆森為經典邏輯所做的溯因辯護,對直覺主義邏輯提供一種威廉姆森式的溯因辯護,從而回應威廉姆森針對直覺主義邏輯提出的反對意見。

英文摘要

In The Philosophy of Philosophy, Timothy Williamson argues for how to understand counterfactual conditionals, epistemology of counterfactuals, and on the basis of which a modal theory in the style of classical logic is given, that is classical modal logic T. Based on a brief rehearse of Williamson's theory, a corresponding intuitionistic version of T can be derived from the perspective of the epistemology of counterfactuals. In the meantime, an abductive defense in a Williamson-style for intuitionistic logic can be given by analogy with the same kind of defense for classical logic, so that Williamson's objection to intuitionistic logic can be responded.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
参考文献
  1. Armour-Garb, B.(2017).Reflections on the Liar,Oxford:
  2. Bell, J.(2008).A Primer of Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  3. Burgess, J.(1999).Which Modal Logic is the Right One?.Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic,40(1),81-93.
  4. Cook, R.,Cogburn, J.(2000).What Negation is Not: Intuitionism and ‘0 = 1’.Analysis,60,5-12.
  5. Fine, K.(1970).Propositional Quantifiers in Modal Logic.Theoria,36,336-346.
  6. Halldén, S.(1963).A Pragmatic Approach to Model Theory.Acta Philosophica Fennica,16,53-63.
  7. Kaplan, D.(1970).S5 with Quantifiable Propositional Variables.Journal of Symbolic Logic,35,355.
  8. Schechter, J.(2006).Schechter, J. “Can Evolution Explain the Reliability of Our Logical Beliefs,” typescript, 2006..
  9. Schechter, J.(2013).Can Evolution Explain Our Reliability about Logic?.Oxford Studies in Epistemology,4,214-239.
  10. Williamson, T.(2018).Alternative Logics and Applied Mathematics.Philosophical Issues,12,399-424.
  11. Williamson, T.(2007).The Philosophy of Philosophy.Oxford:Blackwell.
  12. Williamson, T.(2017).Semantic Paradoxes and Abductive Methodology.Reflections on the Liar,Oxford: