神學轉向抑或陌生經驗？－論列維納斯對他人問題的推進

The Theological Turn or Alien Experience?-On Levinas' Promotion of the Problem of Alien Experience

文晗(Han WEN)

神學轉向 ； 內在性 ； 中介化 ； 陌生經驗 ； Theological Turn ； Immanence ； Mediacy ； Alien Experience

哲學與文化

47卷10期（2020 / 10 / 01）

145 - 160

繁體中文

「現象學的神學轉向」是現象學運動在20世紀下半葉的一次重要轉折。列維納斯無疑是這一轉折中的核心人物。本論文嘗試檢討列維納斯在這一轉向中的地位，同時，論文認為，現象學神學轉向最根本的動力實際上來源於經典的內在性現象學向外在性現象學的轉變，而這一轉變的可能性早就已經蘊含在胡塞爾對陌生經驗問題的探究之中，列維納斯對他人問題的闡釋正是建立在胡塞爾現象學的基礎上，因此，隱藏在現象學神學轉向背後更深層次的問題是現象學的陌生經驗問題。

＂Theological Turn of Phenomenology＂ is an important turning point of phenomenological movement in the second half of the 20th century. Levinas is undoubtedly the central figure in this compromise. While this thesis attempts to examine Levinas' place in this turn, it argues that the most fundamental impetus for the theological turn of phenomenological actually comes from the shift from the phenomenology of interiority to the phenomenology of exteriority, and that the possibility of this shift has long been embedded in Husserl's inquiry into the problem of alien experience, and that Levinas' interpretation of the problem of the other is based on Husserl's phenomenology, so that the deeper problem hidden behind the theological turn of phenomenology is the problem of alien experience in phenomenology.

1. Claesges, Ulrich(Ed.),Held, Klaus(Ed.)(1973).Perspektiven Transzendental—Phänomenologischer Forschung.The Hague:Martinus Nijhoff.
2. Gondek, Hans-Dieter,Tengelyi, László(2010).Neue Phänomenologie in Frankreich.Berlin:Suhrkamp Verlag.
3. Hand, Seán(2009).Emmanuel Levinas.London:Routledge.
4. Husserl, Edmund(1973).Husserliana I, Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge.The Hague:Martinus Nijhoff.
5. Ihde, Don(1990).Technology and the Lifeworld.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
6. Janicaud, Dominique(2009).La phénoméologie dans tous ses états.Paris:Gallimard.
7. Kern, Iso(1964).Husserl und Kant: Eine Untersuchung Ü ber Husserls Verhältnis zu Kant und zum Neukantianismus.The Hague:Martinus Nijhoff.
8. Levinas, Emmanuel(1963).Théorie de l’intuition dans la phénoménologie de Husserl.Paris:Librairie Philosophique Vrin.
9. Levinas, Emmanuel(1990).Totalité et infini: Essai sur L’extériorité.Paris:Le Livre de Poche.
10. Marion, Jean-Luc(2000).Positivité et Transcendance.Paris:PUF.
11. Mohanty, Jitendra Nath(1985).The Possibility of Transcendental Philosophy.The Hage:Springer.
12. Schlossberger(2005).Die Erfahrung des Anderen: Gefühle im menschlichen Miteinander.Akademie Verlag.
13. Simmons, J. Aaron,Benson, Bruce Ellis(2013).The New Phenomenology: A Philosophical Introduction.London:Bloomsbury Academic.
14. Theunissen, Michael,Macann, Christopher(Trans.)(1986).The Other: Studies in the Social Ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
15. Welton, Don(Ed.)(2003).The New Husserl: A Critical Reader.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
16. Zahavi, Dan(2005).Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective.Cambridge MA:Bradford Book.
17. Zahavi, Dan(1999).Michel Henry and the Phenomenology of the Invisible.Continental Philosophy Review,32,223-240.
18. 伊曼紐爾．列維納斯,朱剛（譯）(2016).總體與無限.北京:北京大學出版社.
19. 魯多夫．貝爾奈特,依索．肯恩,艾杜德．瑪律巴赫,李幼蒸（譯）(2011).胡塞爾思想概論.北京:中國人民大學出版社.