再造人倫：曹元弼《春秋》學中的守制與建構

Reconstructing Human Relations: Tradition and Construction in Cao Yuanbi's Study of the Spring and Autumn Annals

許超傑(Chaojie XU)

曹元弼 ； 康有為 ； 《春秋》 ； 正人倫 ； 改制 ； Cao Yuanbi ； Kang Youwei ； Spring and Autumn Annals ； Reconstructing Human Relations ； Reform System

哲學與文化

48卷6期（2021 / 06 / 01）

135 - 150

繁體中文

晚近以降，面對由「華夷」而「中西」，康有為提出「孔子改制」說以應對新局。但曹元弼認為康有為「孔子改制」之說是破壞傳統倫理的邪說，學術壞而人心壞、人心壞而世局壞。故曹氏從「新王」與「素王」的區別入手，提出孔子只是「素王」，而非「新王」，故亦未「改制」。孔子之道是繼承前聖之道，要言之即倫理綱常。為了是正康氏的「孔子改制」說，曹元弼又建構了一條以孔廣森、凌曙、陳立為主、以禮為中心的清代《春秋》學脈絡。進而指出，惟有以禮治《春秋》、正人倫，才能使中國走出中西困境。是以，曹元弼為晚近中國尋找的出路是堅守儒家傳統，「再造人倫」。

Since the late Qing Dnasty, as western culture spreads to the east, Kang Youwei put forward ＂Confucius reform＂ to deal with the new situation. However, Cao Yuanbi thought that kang' s view was a heresy which destroyed traditional ethics. Bad learning leads to bad hearts, bad hearts leads to bad world. Starting from the difference between the new king (新王) and the king without crown (素王), Cao proposed that Confucius was only the king without crown but not the new king, so he did not reform the system. The way of Confucius is the way of inheriting the former sage. In order to refute kang' s Confucius reform theory, Cao Yuanbi also constructed a line of rites in the Spring and Autumn Annals of Qing Dynasty, which Kong Guangsen, Ling Shu and Chen Li are the center of the inheritance. Only the study of the Spring and Autumn Annals ritual thought and correcting human relations can China get out of the dilemma between China and the west. Therefore, Cao Yuanbi looked for a way out for the late China is to stick to the Confucian tradition and Reconstructing Human Relations.

1. (1973).十三經注疏.臺北:藝文印書館.
2. (1976).無求備齋易經集成.臺北:成文出版社.
3. 段熙仲(2002).春秋公羊學講疏.南京:南京師範大學出版社.
4. 康有為(2007).康有為全集.北京:中國人民大學出版社.
5. 康有為(2007).康有為全集.北京:中國人民大學出版社.
6. 曹元弼，《復禮堂文二集》，復旦大學圖書館藏王欣夫鈔本。
7. 曹元弼，《復禮堂文三集》，復旦大學圖書館藏鈔本。
8. 曹元弼，《復禮堂文集》，宣統刻本。
9. 曹元弼，《復禮堂述學詩》，民國 27 年刻本。
10. 曹元弼,周洪（校點）(2012).禮經學.北京:北京大學出版社.
11. 許超傑(2018)。曹元弼《素王說》疏證。中國四庫學，北京:
12. 許超傑(2014)。曹元弼《覆段熙仲書》考釋。南京師範大學文學院學報，2014(4)，182-188。
13. 蘇輿(1992).春秋繁露義證.北京:中華書局.