题名

貝克萊是洛克宗教哲學的反對者嗎?

并列篇名

Is Berkeley Against Locke's Philosophy of Religion?

作者

黃毅(Yi HUANG)

关键词

貝克萊 ; 洛克 ; 宗教哲學 ; Berkeley ; Locke ; Philosophy of Religion

期刊名称

哲學與文化

卷期/出版年月

48卷7期(2021 / 07 / 01)

页次

155 - 170

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

洛克宗教哲學的關鍵在於對理性與信仰的獨特區分,在此基礎上,洛克主張啟示信仰是一種高於、但不違反理性的命題,並進而認為信仰需要受到理性的檢驗。一種流行的詮釋把貝克萊看作對洛克的宗教哲學持反對態度的保守派成員。通過對貝克萊早期和晚期著作的分析,本文論證貝克萊是洛克宗教哲學的有限制的支持者。在洛克、洛克的保守派批評者與貝克萊之間存在著一種微妙而複雜複雜的關聯。

英文摘要

The key of Locke's philosophy of religion is to distinguish reason from faith. On the basis of it, Locke maintains that the revealed faith is a kind of proposition which is higher, but is not counter to reason, and accordingly that faith should be checked up by reason. One popular explanation attempts to see Berkeley as fitting into the tradition of religious critics of Locke's religious view. Through the analysis of Berkeley's early and later works, the paper demonstrates that Berkeley is the qualified defender of Locke's philosophy of religion. The relationship between Locke, Locke's conservative critics and Berkeley is subtle and complex.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
参考文献
  1. Ayers, Michael(1991).Locke: Epistemology and Ontology.London:Routledge.
  2. Benschop, Hans Peter(1997).Berkeley, Lee and Abstract Ideas.British Journal for the History of Philosophy,5,55-66.
  3. Berkeley, George,Luce, A.A.(Ed.),Jessop, T.E.(Ed.)(1948).Berkeley, George. The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. Edited by A.A. Luce and T.E. Jessop. London: Thomas Nelson, 1948-57..London:Thomas Nelson.
  4. Browne, Peter. A Letter in Answer to a Book Entitled Christianity not Mysterious. Dublin: John North, 1697.
  5. C. Southgate, Beverley(2000).‘Beating Down Scepticism’: The Solid Philosophy of John Sergeant, 1623-1707.English Philosophy in the Age of Locke,Oxford:
  6. Edwards, John. A Free Discourse Concerning Truth and Error, Especially in Matters of Religion. London: Jonathan Robinson, 1701.
  7. Edwards, John. Some Thoughts Concerning the Several Causes and Occasions of Atheism, Especially in the Present Age. London: J. Robison / J. Wyat, 1695.
  8. Jolley, Nicholas(2003).Reason’s Dim Candle: Locke’s Critique of Enthusiasm.The Philosophy of John Locke: New Perspectives,London:
  9. Locke, John. The Works of John Locke, London: Thomas Tegg. 1823.
  10. M. Lennon, Thomas(1993).The Battle of the Gods and Giants: The Legacies of Descartes and Gassendi, 1655-1715.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  11. Pearce, Kenneth L.(2014).Berkeley’s Lockean Religious Epistemology.Journal of the History of Ideas,3,417-438.
  12. Sergeant, John. Solid Philosophy Asserted, Against the Fancies of the Ideists: Or, the Method of Science Farther Illustrated. London: Roger Clavil, 1697.
  13. Stewart, M.A.(2000).Stillingfleet and the Way of Ideas.English Philosophy in the Age of Locke,Oxford:
  14. Stillingfleet, Edward. A Discourse in Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity: With an Answer to the Late Socinian Objections Against it from Scripture, Antiquity and Reason. London: Henry Mortlock, 1697.
  15. W. Yolton, John(1956).Lock and the Way of Ideas.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  16. Winkler, Kenneth P.(2005).Berkeley and the Doctrine of Signs.The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley,Cambridge:
  17. 貝克萊,關文運(譯)(1973).人類知識原理.北京:商務印書館.
  18. 洛克,關文運(譯)(1983).人類理解論.北京:商務印書館.