题名

繪畫的現象性-以馬里翁現象學為核心的批判性考察

并列篇名

The Phenomenality of Painting: A Critical Examination Centered on Marion's Phenomenology

作者

陳輝(Hui CHEN)

关键词

繪畫 ; 現象性 ; 存有 ; 被給予性 ; 現象學 ; 馬里翁 ; 海德格爾 ; Painting ; Phenomenality ; Being ; Givenness ; Phenomenology ; Marion ; Heidegger

期刊名称

哲學與文化

卷期/出版年月

48卷8期(2021 / 08 / 01)

页次

59 - 75

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

作為法國當今最為著名的一個現象學家,馬里翁對現象學的一系列基本問題都進行了全新的探討,其中就包括繪畫問題。他以繪畫的現象性(顯現方式)問題為核心,批判了海德格爾的繪畫觀念,揭示出繪畫本身並不首先和最終顯現為存有者,從而服務於存有者真理的顯現,而是作為事件純粹地自身顯現和自身發生。他認為,繪畫作為事件的自身顯現就是顯現為純粹的效果,這種效果就其本質而言是純粹的被給予物。由此,繪畫的現象性並不是存有性,而是被給予性。綜觀馬里翁的分析,一方面,由於其在意義上的開放性,被給予性會解放繪畫顯現的可能性;另一方面,由於其神學解釋學傾向,被給予性也可能會給繪畫顯現帶來新的限制。

英文摘要

As one of the most famous phenomenologists in France today, Jean-Luc Marion has conducted a brand new discussion on a series of basic problems in phenomenology, including the problem of painting. Centering on the issue of the phenomenality (the way of appearing) of painting, he criticizes Heidegger's idea of painting, and reveals that the painting as such does not first and finally appear as the being which would serve the manifestation of the truth of beings, rather it self-appears and self-happens purely as the event. He argues that the self-appearing of painting as the event is to appear as the pure effect, which is the pure given in essence. Therefore, the phenomenality of painting is not the beingness, but the givenness. Reflecting on Marion's analysis, it can be seen that, on the one hand, the givenness will liberate the possibilities of painting's appearing due to its openness in meanings; on the other hand, the givenness may also bring new limits to painting's appearing due to its tendency of theological hermeneutics.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
参考文献
  1. Cézanne, Paul,Doran, P. M.(Éd.)(1978).Conversations avec Cézanne.Paris:Macula.
  2. Fritz, Peter Joseph(2009).Black Holes and Revelations: Michel Henry and Jean-Luc Marion on the Aesthetics of the Invisible.Modern Theology,25(3),415-440.
  3. Gschwandtner, Christina M.(2014).Degrees of Givenness: On Saturation in Jean-Luc Marion.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
  4. Kandinsky, Wassily,Lindsay, Kenneth C.(Ed.),Vergo, Peter(Ed.)(1982).Kandinsky: Complete Writings on Art.Boston:Da Capo Press.
  5. Mackinlay, Shane(2010).Interpreting Excess: Jean-Luc Marion, Saturated Phenomena, and Hermeneutics.New York:Fordham University Press.
  6. Marion, Jean-Luc(2010).Certitudes négatives.Paris:Éditions Grasset & Fasquelle.
  7. Marion, Jean-Luc(2005).Le visible et le révélé.Paris:Les É ditions du Cerf.
  8. Marion, Jean-Luc(2013).Étant donné. Essai d’une phénoménologie de la donation.Paris:Presses Universitaires de France.
  9. Marion, Jean-Luc(2013).La croisée du visible.Paris:Presses Universitaires de France.
  10. Marion, Jean-Luc(2015).Ce que nous voyons et ce qui apparaît.Bry-sur-Marne:INA Éditions.
  11. Marion, Jean-Luc(2010).De surcroît. Études sur les phénomènes saturés.Paris:Presses Universitaires de France.
  12. Westphal, Merold(2006).Vision and Voice: Phenomenology and Theology in the Work of Jean-Luc Marion.International Journal for Philosophy of Religion,60(1-3),117-137.
  13. 胡塞爾,李幼蒸(譯)(2014).純粹現象學通論.北京:中國人民大學出版社.
  14. 胡塞爾,李幼蒸(譯)(2013).現象學的構成研究.北京:中國人民大學出版社.
  15. 胡塞爾,倪梁康(譯)(2007).現象學的觀念.北京:人民出版社.
  16. 海德格爾,孫周興(譯)(2004).林中路.上海:上海譯文出版社.
  17. 海德格爾,陳嘉映(譯),王慶節(譯)(2006).存在與時間.北京:生活.讀書.三聯書店.
  18. 馬里翁,方向紅(編),黃作(編)(2020).笛卡爾與現象學——馬里翁訪華演講集.北京:生活.讀書.新知三聯書店.
  19. 馬里翁,方向紅(譯)(2009).還原與給予.上海:上海譯文出版社.