题名

真理困境與基督教恩典論-從希臘哲學的衰落和教父哲學的興起談起

并列篇名

The Issue of Truth and Christian Concept of Grace-Emergence of Patristic Philosophy in Perspective of Failure of Greek Philosophy

作者

謝文郁(Wenyu XIE)

关键词

希臘哲學 ; 教父哲學 ; 真理困境 ; 恩典 ; 理性 ; Greek Philosophy ; Patristic Philosophy ; Truth Impasse ; Grace ; Reason

期刊名称

哲學與文化

卷期/出版年月

48卷10期(2021 / 10 / 01)

页次

3 - 22

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

中文學界對希臘哲學過渡到教父哲學這段歷史的研究尚處於初始階段。我們需要對這個過渡進行深入的思想史分析。本文希望提供這個分析,涉及希臘哲學在真理問題上所陷入的懷疑主義困境,以及《約翰福音》的恩典真理論對真理困境的回應及其在認識論上的突破;進而展示早期教父努力運用恩典概念回應希臘哲學的真理困境時所產生的思想力量。在這個分析中,本文還希望呈現恩典概念的認識論意義及其思想史貢獻。

英文摘要

The transition from Greek philosophy to Patristic philosophy is an issue rarely addressed in Chinese scholarship. This paper is taking up the issue and examine its significance in the history of western thought. As an initial suggestion, firstly, I am analyzing into the conceptual connection between the impasse of Greek skepticism, into which Greek philosophers in their pursuits for truth get stuck, and the response to it provided by Christian thinkers in terms of the concept of grace. And then, I am endeavoring to demonstrate the concept of grace in the gospel of John, as well as perceived by early church fathers, and further its relevance to the issue of truth. One significant feature in their efforts is that they had shown the epistemological power of grace, which have then become the driving force in the development of western thought.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
参考文献
  1. Cameron, Alan(1969).The Last Days of the Academy at Athens.Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society,195,7-29.
  2. Cicero. De Finibus. Book 5. The Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931.
  3. Clement of Alexandria. Strōmateis. Book 5. In Ante-Nicene Fathers. Vol. 2. Trans. by William Wilson. Ed. by Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe. Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1885.
  4. Drewery, Benjamin(2009).Origen and the Doctrine of Grace.Wipf and Stock.
  5. Empiricus, Sextus,Bury, R. G.(Trans.)(1967).Outlines of Pyrrhonism.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  6. Graeser, A.(1972).Plotinus and the Stoics.Leiden:Brill.
  7. Hornblower, Simon(Ed.),Spawforth, Antony(Ed.)(1996).The Oxford Classical Dictionary.London:Oxford University Press.
  8. Irenaeus. Against Heresies. Trans. by Alexander Roberts and William Rambaut. In Ante-Nicene Fathers. Vol. 1. Ed. by Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe. Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Co., 1885.
  9. Kalligas, Paul(2004).Platonism in Athens During the First Two Centuries AD: An Overview.Rhizai,2,37-56.
  10. Long, A. A.(1987).The Hellenistic Philosophers.London:Cambridge University Press.
  11. Long, A. A.(1987).The Hellenistic Philosophers.London:Cambridge University Press.
  12. Longo, Angela(Ed.),Taormina, Daniela Patrizia(Ed.)(2016).Plotinus and Epicurus: Matter, Perception, Pleasure.Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press.
  13. Magrin, Sara(2010).Sensation and Scepticism in Plotinus.Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy,39,249-297.
  14. Mitchell, James McNulty(1997).Fordham University.
  15. Opsomer, Jan(1998).In Search of the Truth: Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism.Brussels:Paleis der Academien Hertogsstraat I.
  16. Plato,Hamilton, E.(Ed.),Cairns, H.(Ed.)(1961).The Collected Dialogues of Plato.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  17. Proclus,Morrow, Glenn R.(Intro.),Mueller, Ian(Trans.)(1992).A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  18. Sellars, John(Ed.)(2016).Routledge Handbook of Stoicism.London:Routledge.
  19. Steel, C.(Trans.)(2007).Proclus: On Providence.London:Duckworth.
  20. 林旭鑫(2017)。諾斯替主義之研究傳統和現狀評述——兼論 γνωσις 漢譯問題。世界宗教研究,165,180-190。
  21. 柏拉圖,謝文郁(譯注)(2003).蒂邁歐篇.上海:上海人民出版社.
  22. 第歐根尼.拉爾修,徐開來(譯),傅林(譯)(2010).名哲言行錄.桂林:廣西師範大學出版社.
  23. 普羅提諾,石敏敏(譯)(2009).九章集.北京:中國社會科學出版社.
  24. 塞涅卡,包利民(譯)(2005).強者的溫柔.北京:中國社會科學出版社.
  25. 謝文郁(2007)。恩典真理論——從《約翰福音》看希臘哲學和希伯來文化的真理問題。哲學門,北京:
  26. 謝文郁(2007).自由與生存.上海:上海人民出版社.
  27. 謝文郁(2016)。真理與生存的張力——以《約翰福音》和《齊物論》的真理觀為例。學術月刊,48(560),67-74。
  28. 謝文郁(2012).道路與真理.上海:華東師範大學出版社.
  29. 謝文郁(2018)。真理與真知——從愛任紐與華倫提努之間的爭論談起。河北學刊,38(1),20-29。
  30. 謝文郁(2016)。柏拉圖真理情結中的理型和天命——兼論柏拉圖的「未成文學說」。北京大學學報,53(2),39-51。
被引用次数
  1. 張欣(2023)。美與默觀成神:一項對普羅提諾與尼薩的額我略的比較研究。哲學與文化,50(10),3-18。