以《交友論》和《逑友篇》為例談友道

Taking Matteo Ricci's Jiao You Lun and Martino Martini's Qiu You Pian as Examples Discussion on the Principles of Friendship

蘇嫈雰(Ying-Fen SU)

中華新士林哲學 ； 利瑪竇 ； 衛匡國 ； 《交友論》 ； 《逑友篇》 ； Chinese Neo-scholasticism ； Matteo Ricci ； Martino Martini ； Jiao You Lun (On Friendship) ； Qiu You Pian (Pamphlet on Gathering Friends)

哲學與文化

48卷12期（2021 / 12 / 01）

51 - 67

繁體中文

本文以利瑪竇《交友論》和衛匡國《逑友篇》為例談友道，所持理由有二，為何利瑪竇《交友論》（1595）對中國士人帶來震撼和關注，此其一。衛匡國與祝石談及利瑪竇《交友論》為何認為該書未備「未盡友義之深之博」，遂作《逑友篇》（1647）擴充友道內容，此其二。本文依序探討（一）前言：中國士人是否鮮少注意五倫之末朋友倫？為何《交友論》和《逑友篇》對中國士人帶來震撼和關注？（二）友道之根：據德相友及信、愛；（三）友處之方：不求非義與毋偽毋疑；（四）益友朂培德：察其所愛、忠告責善改過；（五）結語：本文通過《交友論》和《逑友篇》探討掌握到友道之根，友處之方，益友朂培養愛德臻至善，可以提供現代人交友之道不同的思考途徑。

In this paper there are two reasons to taking Matteo Ricci's Jiao You Lun (《交友論》, On Friendship, 1595) and Martino Martini's Qiu You Pian (《逑友篇》, Pamphlet on Gathering Friends, 1647) as examples discussion on the principles of friendship. The first one is, why did Matteo Ricci's Jiao You Lun astonish Chinese Scholars and attract their attention? The second one is, since Martino Martini and Chu Shih (祝石) considered that ＂the contents of Ricci's Jiao You Lun did not covered completely regarding the depth and broadness of the meaning of friendship, ＂they wrote Qiu You Pian to increase and broaden the contents of the principles of friendship. This paper aims to explore five sections as following: (1) Preface: did Chinese scholars seldom pay attention on the relationship of friends, the last relationship among wu lun? Why did Jiao You Lun and Qiu You Pian astonish Chinese Scholars and attract their attention? (2) The foundation for the principles of friendship: people should choose a friend with one's virtue, sincerity, philia. (3) Ways to with friends: maintain friendship without injustice and unrighteousness, no-fake and no-doubt. (4) Good friendship develops the cultivation of virtue: a discussion on how to examine in what things your friend prefers, faithfully admonish and lead your friend to choose what is good, and to correct one's mistakes. (5) Conclusion: by taking Matteo Ricci's Jiao You Lun and Martino Martini's Qiu You Pian, this paper explores the foundation for the principles of friendship, ways to with friends, and how good friendship develops the cultivation of love in order to achieve the highest excellence. This paper is to provide the moderns with a different way of thinking on the principles of friendship.

1. 李林(2019)。無信不立——《論語》所見「信」義內涵與啟示。哲學與文化，46(2)，137-151。
   連結：
2. 沈清松(2010)。當代中華新士林哲學與現代性困境的超克。哲學與文化，37(11)，5-22。
   連結：
3. （清）朱駿聲(1984).說文通訓定聲.北京:中華書局.
4. （漢）許慎,（清）段玉裁（注）(1992).說文解字注.臺北:天工書局.
5. 王志成,趙頌平(1994)。交友的學問——《逑友篇》簡介。神學論集，102，581-592。
6. 石衡潭(2016)。從合儒、補儒到超儒——利瑪竇《交友論》與衛匡國《逑友篇》試論。世界宗教研究，2016(5)，121-127。
7. 何俊(1998).西學與晚明思想的裂變.上海:人民出版社.
8. 利瑪竇,朱維錚（編）(2001).利瑪竇中文著譯集.上海:復旦大學出版社.
9. 徐明德(2010)。論明末來華耶穌會士對「交友」原則的闡釋。浙江學刊，2010(4)，60-65。
10. 張世超(1996).金文形義通解.京都:中文出版社.
11. 張西平（編）,任大援（編）(2014).梵蒂岡圖書館藏明清中西文化交流史文獻叢刊（第一輯）.鄭州:大象出版社.
12. 張西平（編）,任大援（編）(2014).梵蒂岡圖書館藏明清中西文化交流史文獻叢刊（第一輯）.鄭州:大象出版社.
13. 陳村富（編）(1994).宗教與文化論叢.北京:東方出版社.
14. 傅佩榮（解讀）(1999).論語.臺北:立緒文化事業公司.
15. 曾春海(2010).先秦哲學史.臺北:五南圖書公司.
16. 漢語大字典編輯委員會(1987).漢語大字典.湖北:新華書店.
17. 潘小慧(2000)。論「直」——是與非之間。哲學論集，33，125-144。
18. 鍾鳴旦（編）,杜鼎克（編）,蒙曦（編）(2009).法國國家圖書館明清天主教文獻.臺北:臺北利氏學社.
19. 關永中(1997).愛、恨與死亡：一個現代哲學的探索.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
20. 鐘鳴旦, Nicolas,洪力行（譯）(2014).傳教中的「他者」：中國經驗教我們的事.新北:輔大書坊.
21. 顧紅亮(2008)。從猶太對話哲學解讀「有朋自遠方來」。齊魯學刊，2008(1)，16-20。