當代自然法論的核心命題與論證方式

The Core Thesis and Arguments of Contemporary Natural Law Theories

王鵬翔(Peng-Hsiang WANG)

自然法論 ； 行動理由 ； 法律觀點論證 ； 語言行動論證 ； 功能論證 ； 法律缺陷 ； 法效力 ； Natural Law Jurisprudence ； Reasons for Action ； The Legal Point of View Argument ； The Speech Act Argument ； The Functional Argument ； Legal Defectiveness ； Legal Validity

哲學與文化

49卷2期（2022 / 02 / 01）

61 - 81

繁體中文

「法律必然是理性的行為標準」是當代自然法論的核心主張。本文區分自然法命題的強弱兩種版本，並討論弱的自然法命題的三種辯護方式：法律觀點論證、語言行動論證、功能論證。

The core thesis of contemporary natural law theories is that law is necessarily a rational standard for conduct. This article distinguishes between the strong and the weak version of the natural law thesis, and discusses three lines of arguments in support of the weak natural law thesis: the legal point of view argument, the speech act argument, and the functional argument.

1. 周明泉(2012)。論 John Finnis 的新自然法理論與天主教社會理論融通之可能性。哲學與文化，39(9)，113-146。
   連結：
2. 莊世同(2007)。描述性法理論是可能的嗎？。政治與社會哲學評論，21，1-46。
   連結：
3. Alexy, Robert(2013).Some Reflections on the Ideal Dimension of Law and on the Legal Philosophy of John Finnis.The American Journal of Jurisprudence,58(2),97-110.
4. Alexy, Robert(2021).Law’s Ideal Dimension.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
5. Alexy, Robert(2002).The Argument from Injustice.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
6. Aquinas, Thomas,Regan, Richard J.(trans. ed.)(2002).On Law, Morality, and Politics.Indianapolis:Hackett Publishing.
7. Beyleveld, Deryck,Brownsword, Roger(2002).Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
8. Crowe, Jonathan(2016).Natural Law Theories.Philosophy Compass,11(2),91-101.
9. Crowe, Jonathan(2019).Natural Law and the Nature of Law.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
10. Duke, George(2016).The Weak Natural Law Thesis and the Common Good.Law and Philosophy,35,485-509.
11. Duke, George,George, Robert P.(2017).Introduction.The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence,Cambridge:
12. Finnis, John(2011).Natural Law and Natural Rights.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
13. Finnis, John(2020).Natural Law Theories.The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition)
14. Fuller, Lon L.(1969).The Morality of Law.New Haven:Yale University Press.
15. Hart, H. L. A.(1994).The Concept of Law.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
16. Moore, Michael S.(1992).Law as a Functional Kind.Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays,Oxford:
17. Murphy, Mark(2005).Natural Law Theory.The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory,Oxford:
18. Murphy, Mark(2006).Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
19. Murphy, Mark(2013).The Explanatory Role of the Weak Natural Law Thesis.Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law,Oxford:
20. Murphy, Mark(2001).Natural Law and Practical Rationality.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
21. Murphy, Mark(2003).Natural Law Jurisprudence.Legal Theory,9,241-267.
22. Murphy, Mark(2012).Defect and Deviance in Natural Law Jurisprudence.Institutionalized Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy,Oxford:
23. Raz, Joseph(2009).The Authority of Law.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
24. Raz, Joseph(2009).Between Authority and Interpretation.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
25. Shapiro, Scott(2011).Legality.Cambridge MA:Belknap Press.
26. 王鵬翔，〈法實證主義〉，《華文哲學百科》（審查中），暫時網址：https://reurl.cc/8Wpvkb（檢索於 2021 年 10 月 5 日）。
27. 陳妙芬(2021).法哲學：自然法研究.臺北:聯經出版事業公司.
28. 謝世民（編）(2017).理由轉向——規範性之哲學研究.臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心.
29. 顏厥安(1998).法與實踐理性.臺北:允晨文化.