题名

貫通阿含與般若之間-試探《中論》所論為何

并列篇名

Connecting between Āgama and Prājna-Explore What Sutra is Illustrated in the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā

作者

林建德(Chien-Te LIN)

关键词

阿含 ; 般若 ; 中觀 ; 印順法師 ; 通教 ; 詮釋循環 ; Āgama ; Prājna ; Mādhyamika ; YinShun ; TongJiao ; Hermeneutic Circle

期刊名称

哲學與文化

卷期/出版年月

49卷4期(2022 / 04 / 01)

页次

45 - 64

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

龍樹的《中論》在佛教思想史上有著重要地位,傳統以來雖詮解不一,但始終視為是般若的論書,近來卻有學者指出《中論》更貼近於聲聞教法而非大乘。本文接受另一調和性觀點,認為《中論》緊密關乎阿含與般若,乃以般若思想通論阿含,目的是為了開演般若,進而貫通阿含與般若之間。本文除緒論和結論外,首先簡介R. H. Robinson和印順法師的觀點;其次對比「以阿含術語展示般若思想」與「以般若思想通論阿含深義」之各自說法;再而指出兩者同大於異,所謂的阿含術語亦不離阿含義理,《中論》以阿含展示般若,背後所預設的正是般若思想,因此完整的說是以般若通論阿含術語和法義,進而闡揚般若空性思想,如是構成一「詮釋循環」;最後認為以《中論》為「通教」的法義定位,有助於正確而深刻地掌握中觀學精義。

英文摘要

Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā has an important place in the history of Buddhist philosophy. Although traditionally interpreted differently, it has always been regarded as an interpretation of the Prajñāpāramitā Sutras. Recently, some scholars have pointed out that Mūlamadhyamakakārikā is more closely related to the teaching of Śrāvaka than Mahayana. This paper accepts another conciliatory point of view. It is believed that Mūlamadhyamakakārikā is both connected to Āgama and Prājna. It is an elaboration of Āgama based on Prājna, and the purpose is to illustrate the Prajña teachings and make a tight union between Āgama and Prājna. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper first presents the views of R. H. Robinson and Master YinShun, and then compares the respective statements of "presenting the thought of Prājna with the Āgama terms" and "applying the Prājna thought to discuss the philosophies of Āgama," suggesting that the two are more alike than different. The usage of Āgama terminologies does not deviate from the philosophies of Āgama, and presenting Prājna thought in Āgama terms is exactly presupposing the Prājna philosophies. The more complete understanding, therefore, would be Nāgārjuna elaborates Āgama based on Prājna, and then illustrates the philosophies of Prājna, thus constituting a form of "hermeneutic circle." Finally, I further examine and discuss YinShun's views, concluding that his interpretation of Mūlamadhyamakakārikā as a type of "General Teachings" (TongJiao) of Buddhism is conducive to accessing the cores of Mādhyamika more accurately and profoundly.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
参考文献
  1. Analayo(2015).Compassion and Emptiness in Early Buddhist Meditation.UK Cambridge:Windhorse Publications.
  2. Choong、 Mun-keat, Wei-keat(1999).The Notion of Emptiness in Early Buddhism.New Delhi:Motilal Banarsidass.
  3. Gomez, Luis O.(1976).Proto-Madhyamika in the Pali Canon.Philosophy East and West,26(2),137-165.
  4. Inada, K. K.(1970).Nāgārjuna: A Translation of His Mūlamadhyamakakārikā with an Introductory Essay.Tokyo:The Hokuseido Press.
  5. Kalupahana, D. J.(1986).Nāgārjuna: The Philosophy of the Middle Way.NY:SUNY Press.
  6. Kalupahana, D. J.(1980).The Early Buddhist Notion of the Middle Path.Journal of Chinese Philosophy,7,73-90.
  7. Katsura, Shōryū,Siderits, Mark(2015).Nāgārjuna’s Middle Way: Mūlamadhyamakakārikā.Boston:Wisdom Publications.
  8. Keane, Niall(Ed.),Lawn, Chris(Ed.)(2016).The Blackwell Companion to Hermeneutics.UK:Wiley-Blackwell.
  9. Robinson, R. H.(1967).Early Mādhyamika in India and China.Madison:University of Wisconsin Press.
  10. Velez de Cea, Abraham(2005).Emptiness in the Pali Suttas and the Question of Nāgārjuna’s Orthodoxy.Philosophy East and West,55(4),507-528.
  11. Walser, Joseph(2005).Nāgārjuna in Context: Mahāyāna Buddhism and Early Indian Culture.NY:Columbia University Press.
  12. Warder, A. K.(1973).Is Nāgārjuna a Mahāyānist?.The Problem of Two Truths in Buddhism and Vedānta
  13. 中村元(2003).龍樹.東京:講談社.
  14. 木村泰賢,釋依觀(譯)(2021).根本佛教解脫道論:新大乘運動思想觀.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
  15. 世親(造),玄奘(譯)。世親造,玄奘譯,《攝大乘論釋》(T31)。
  16. 弘悲。弘悲,《七十空性論科攝》(B09)。
  17. 玄奘(譯)。玄奘譯,《般若波羅蜜多心經》(T08)。
  18. 求那跋陀羅(譯)。求那跋陀羅譯,《雜阿含經》(T02)。
  19. 林鎮國(1999).空性與現代性.臺北:立緒文化事業公司.
  20. 智旭。智旭,《教觀綱宗》(T46)。
  21. 萬金川(1998).中觀思想講錄.嘉義:香光書鄉出版社.
  22. 萬金川(1998).詞義之爭與義理之辯.南投:正觀出版社.
  23. 葉少勇(2011).《中論頌》與《佛護釋》:基於新發現梵文寫本的文獻學研究.上海:中西書局.
  24. 鳩摩羅什(譯)。鳩摩羅什譯,《金剛般若波羅蜜經》(T08)。
  25. 蔣揚仁欽(譯)=黃春元(譯)(2019).中觀根本論釋.佛護論.臺北:商周出版.
  26. 諦觀。諦觀,《天臺四教儀》(T46)。
  27. 龍樹(造),青目(釋),鳩摩羅什(譯)。龍樹造,青目釋,鳩摩羅什譯,《中論》(T30)。
  28. 龍樹(造),毘目智仙(譯),瞿曇流支(譯)。龍樹造,毘目智仙,瞿曇流支譯,《迴諍論》(T32)。
  29. 龍樹(造),清辨(釋),波羅頗蜜多羅(譯)。龍樹造,清辨釋,波羅頗蜜多羅譯,《般若燈論釋》(T30)。
  30. 龍樹(造),無著(釋),瞿曇般若流支(譯)。龍樹造,無著釋,瞿曇般若流支譯,《順中論》(T30)。
  31. 彌勒(說),無著(造),玄奘(譯)。彌勒說,無著造,玄奘譯,《瑜伽師地論》(T30)。
  32. 藍吉富(1973)。漢譯本「中論」初探。華岡佛學學報,3,79-134。
  33. 釋印順(1992).中觀今論.臺北:正聞出版社.
  34. 釋印順(1992).中觀論頌講記.臺北:正聞出版社.
  35. 釋印順(2000).以佛法研究佛法.新竹:正聞出版社.
  36. 釋印順(2004).永光集.新竹:正聞出版社.
  37. 釋印順(2005).印度佛教思想史.新竹:正聞出版社.
  38. 釋印順(2005).成佛之道(增注本).新竹:正聞出版社.
  39. 釋印順(2005).佛法概論.新竹:正聞出版社.
  40. 釋印順(2003).性空學探源.新竹:正聞出版社.
  41. 釋印順(2000).空之探究.新竹:正聞出版社.
  42. 釋印順(2003).唯識學探源.新竹:正聞出版社.
  43. 釋印順(2005).華雨集(四).新竹:正聞出版社.
  44. 梶山雄一,吳汝鈞(譯)(1980).佛教中觀哲學.臺北:佛光出版社.
  45. 梶山雄一,吳汝鈞(譯)(2000).龍樹與中後期中觀學.臺北:文津出版社.