導言：推理及其評價判準研究專題

Introduction: Standards for Evaluating Reasoning

蘇慶輝(Ching Hui SU)

哲學與文化

49卷5期（2022 / 05 / 01）

1 - 5

繁體中文

1. Beall, Jc,Restall, Greg,Sagi, Gil(2019).Logical Consequence.The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
2. Broome, John(2013).Rationality through Reasoning.MA:Wiley Blackwell.
3. Grice, H. P.(2001).Aspects of Reason.Clarendon Press.
4. Heit, E.,Rubinstein, J.(1994).Similarity and Property Effects in Inductive Reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,20,411-422.
5. Liu, Chi Yen(2020).The Similarity between Buddhist Logic and Assertion Theory: Exclude Pakṣa and Context.Tetsugaku,4,171-184.
6. Norton, John D.(2003).A Material Theory of Induction.Philosophy of Science,70(4),647-670.
7. Norton, John D.(2014).A Material Dissolution of the Problem of Induction.Synthese,191(4),1-20.
8. Oetke, Claus(1996).Ancient Indian Logic as a Theory of Non-monotonic Reasoning.Journal of Indian Philosophy,24,447-539.
9. Restall, Greg(2005).Multiple Conclusions.Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science
10. Russell, Gillian(2019).Logical Pluralism.The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
11. Stalnaker, Robert(1999).Context and Content: Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Though.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
12. Steinberger, Florian(2011).Why Conclusions Should Remain Single.Journal of Philosophical Logic,40(3),333-355.
13. Su, Ching Hui(2017).Context and Logical Consequence.Journal of Philosophical Research,42,399-411.
14. 約翰．布魯姆,榮立武（譯）(2021).推理得來的理性.北京:科學出版社.
15. 蘇慶輝，〈邏輯結果〉，王一奇編，華文哲學百科，http://mephilosophy.ccu.edu.tw/entry.php?entry_name=邏輯結果（檢索於 2022 年 4 月 19 日）。

1. 蘇慶輝(2023)。從評價論證的相對性來看邏輯系統的選擇問題。哲學與文化，50(2)，77-96。