英文摘要
|
All disciplines are created and developed by people, who are cognitive to phenomena to a certain degree, have common structures in thinking and respond similarly. Therefore, this article is meant to study such common structures in thinking through some "thinking units," comparing the X, Y, Z and C theories in management and the pre-Qin schools of Confucianism, Taoism, Mohism and Legalism with regards to phenomenon observation, positioning of human nature, cause-effect relationships, effect evaluation and management methods in order to establish an effective cross-disciplinary methodology based on context construction, context processing and context integration. Through cross-disciplinary thinking structure, we try to analyze and compare the similarities, differences and cause-effect relationships between the Pre-Qin philosophical schools and the theories on modern management, revealing the possibilities of integration and development between humanism and social science through analyzing the common thinking structures and disciplinary differences.
|
参考文献
|
-
李賢中(2017)。先秦邏輯史研究方法探析。哲學與文化,44(6)
連結:
-
McGregor, Douglas,Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel(注釋),韓卉(譯)(2017).企業的人性面.杭州:浙江人民出版社.
-
McGregor, Douglas,杜建芳(譯)(2015).企業的人事.北京:北京理工大學出版社.
-
三島齊紀,劉立善(譯)(2012)。論馬斯洛「自我實現」概念的內涵——以概念的嬗變為中心。日本研究,2012(3)
-
大內, W. G.,朱雁斌(譯)(2019).Z 理論.北京:機械工業出版社.
-
王讚源(1996).墨子.臺北:三民書局.
-
成中英(2004).C 理論——易經管理哲學.臺北:東大圖書公司.
-
宋學軍(編)(2006).一次讀完 28 本管理學經典.臺北:海鴿文化出版圖書公司.
-
李甦平(1998).韓非.臺北:東大圖書公司.
-
李賢中(2021)。文本詮釋意義飽沃度與詮釋典範。湖南大學學報(社會科學版),35(4)
-
柳振群(2008).老子管理思想研究.天津:天津古籍出版社.
-
孫詒讓(1987).墨子閒詁.臺北:華正書局.
-
張振東(1978).西洋哲學導論.臺北:臺灣學生書局.
-
勞思光(2011).新編中國哲學史(一).臺北:三民書局.
-
黃光國(2000).王者之道.臺北:樂學書局.
-
黎紅雷(1993).儒家管理哲學.廣州:廣東高等教育出版社.
|