题名

混雜的真義:《中庸》「率性」之「率」梳析

并列篇名

The Mixed Truth: Carding and Analyse of the Word "Shuai" in Doctrine of the Mean

作者

孫玲玲(Lingling SUN)

关键词

《中庸》 ; 率性 ; 循 ; 引導 ; 統率 ; Doctrine of the Mean ; Shuai Xing ; Follow ; Guide ; Lead

期刊名称

哲學與文化

卷期/出版年月

49卷12期(2022 / 12 / 01)

页次

151 - 165

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

鄭、朱皆解「率」為「循也」的傳統認知,傳達了程朱一派在該問題上對鄭玄思想的承繼,卻忽視了在不同的人性觀背景下,鄭、朱之「循」並非一義。絕對的「依循」已脫離了「率」義,在此之下隱藏的是「率」之工夫和主體問題。在對絕對「依循」的反思之外,「率」字之「統率」、「引導」等義項亦被用在注解中,學界對「依循」之解呈現出離與回歸並存的態勢,二者相互糾纏、各執一端。基於對先秦儒學基本宗旨的把握和對「天命之性」的再認知而看,「依循」「駕馭」與「引導」分別是在不同維度和不同階段中對「性」的應有態度,並非矛盾立場,當綜合諸義,從多維度理解,以時境擇取,更能更準確地理解《中庸》「率性」之真義。

英文摘要

The traditional cognition that Both Zheng Xuan and Zhu Xi Put the "shuai" Interpreted as "follow" conveyed the step-after of Cheng Zhu and Zheng Xuan on this issue, which ignored the difference of their different backgrounds on the viewpoint of humanity. All these raised the attention of efforts and action originators issues of "shuai" under the definition of "follow". The other separation of meanings such as "lead" and "guide" of "shuai" were also used to definite this word beside the rethink of "follow". Which lead to two situations of departure and come back of the explanation as "follow" in academia, they entangled and can't convince the other side. To view based on the basic concepts of confucian before Qin and the re-cognition of humanity nature endowed by heaven, "follow" "guide" and "lead" are all right attitude to humanity nature which argued on different aspects and stages and they are not contradictory position totally. Which means that we should blend all the definitions and view from all aspects, to choose abide by times and detailed situations, so that we can understand the real meaning of "shuai xing" of the Doctrine of the Mean more exactly.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
参考文献
  1. (1983).四書章句集注.北京:中華書局.
  2. (1983).二程集.北京:中華書局.
  3. (1980).十三經注疏.
  4. (宋)衛湜,楊少涵(點校)(2011).中庸集說.桂林:灕江出版社.
  5. (宋)黎靖德(編)(1983).朱子語類.北京:中華書局.
  6. (清)黃宗羲(2020).明儒學案.北京:中華書局.
  7. (清)戴震(2018).孟子字義疏證.北京:中華書局.
  8. 于省吾(1996).甲骨文字詁林.北京:中華書局.
  9. 李景林(2014).教化儒學論.貴陽:孔學堂書局.
  10. 李零(2009).郭店楚簡校讀記.北京:中國人民大學出版社.
  11. 李學勤(編)(2012).字源.天津:天津古籍出版社.
  12. 季旭昇(2014).說文新證.臺北:藝文印書館.
  13. 金景芳(1990)。論孔子思想的兩個核心。歷史研究,5
  14. 徐復觀(2013).中國人性論史.先秦篇.北京:九州出版社.
  15. 梁濤(2008).郭店竹簡與思孟學派.北京:中國人民大學出版社.
  16. 郭沂(2008).儒家思孟學派論集.濟南:齊魯書社.
  17. 彭林(2001)。始者近情.終者近義——子思學派對禮的理論詮釋。中國史研究,3
  18. 穀衍奎(編)(2003).漢字源流字典.北京:華夏出版社.
  19. 錢穆(2021).宋代理學三書隨劄.北京:九州出版社.
  20. 顧史考(2018).郭店楚簡先秦儒書宏微觀.上海:上海古籍出版社.