反例外論何以生成？－從邏輯常項的劃界看

The Rise of Anti-exceptionalism in Relation to the Demarcation Problem of Logical Constants

張留華(Liuhua ZHANG)

邏輯常項 ； 邏輯例外論 ； 反例外論 ； 邏輯詞彙表 ； 先驗性 ； Logical Constants ； Exceptionalism about Logic ； Anti-exceptionalism ； Logical Vocabulary ； A Priori

哲學與文化

50卷2期（2023 / 02 / 01）

61 - 76

繁體中文;英文

邏輯反例外論作為一種新思潮，有多方面可能的歷史和理論動因。本文選擇「邏輯常項劃界」問題（即「什麼可以什麼不可以歸屬邏輯常項」）作為切入點，結合現代邏輯的發展史以及當代邏輯哲學中的熱點爭議，試圖從微觀視角考察和論證「邏輯例外論」所遭遇的種種深層次困境，進而揭示「反例外論」何以具有理論吸引力。在反例外論的邏輯觀念下，邏輯常項依舊在當代邏輯及其應用領域保有重要地位，但此種重要性建立在非先驗選定的一種邏輯詞彙表之上。

Anti-exceptionalism about logic is multi-motivated historically and theoretically. This paper chooses to explore its rise from the perspective of demarcating logical constants, trying to consider various deep difficulties of exceptionalism about logic and thereby to show the theoretical appeal of anti-exceptionalism about logic, in view of some historical facts of modern logic and recent debates in philosophy of logic. In the framework of anti-exceptionalism about logic, an important role of logical constants played in philosophy and the sciences can be retained, but it is relative to a non-a-priori adjudication on the matter of logical vocabulary.

1. Ayer, A.(1952).Language, Truth and Logic.New York:Dover.
2. Ayer, A.(Ed.)(1959).Logical Positivism.New York:The Free Press.
3. Bueno, O.,Shalkowski, S.(2013).Logical Constants: A Modalist Approach.Noûs,47
4. Carnap, R. Logical Syntax of Language. New York: Routledge, 1937.
5. Craig, E.(Ed.)(1998).Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.London:Routledge.
6. Dummett, M.(1973).Frege: Philosophy of Language.New York:Harper & Row.
7. Gibson, Roger(Ed.)(2004).Quintessence.London:The Belknap Press.
8. Hjortland, O.(2017).Anti-exceptionalism about Logic.Philosophical Studies,174
9. MacFarlane, J.(2017).Logical Constants.The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
10. Prior, A.,Geach, P.(Ed.),Kenny, A.(Ed.)(1976).Papers in Logic and Ethics.Amherst:University Massachusetts Press.
11. Quine, W.(2013).Word and Object.Cambridge:The MIT Press.
12. Quine, W.(1986).Philosophy of Logic.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
13. Quine, W.(1953).Mr. Strawson on Logical Theory.Mind,62
14. Quine, W. "The Problem of Interpreting Modal Logic," The Journal of Symbolic Logic 12(1947).
15. Read, S.(2019).Anti-Exceptionalism about Logic.Australasian Journal of Logic,16
16. Russell, B.(1996).The Principles of Mathematics.New York:W. W. Norton.
17. Sainsbury, M.(2001).Logical Forms.Oxford:Blackwell.
18. Sher, G.(2021).Invariance and Logicality in Perspective.The Semantic Conception of Logic,Cambridge:
19. Sher, G.(2013).The Foundational Problem of Logic.The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic,19
20. Sher, G.(1991).The Bounds of Logic.Cambridge:The MIT Press.
21. Steinberger, F.(2011).What Harmony Could and Could Not Be.Australasian Journal of Philosophy,89
22. Tarski, A.(1986).What Are Logical Notions?.History and Philosophy of Logic,7
23. Tarski, A.(1994).Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
24. Tarski, A.,Woodger, J.(Trans.)(1956).Semantics and Metamathematics.Oxford:The Clarendon Press.
25. Warmbrod, K.(1999).Logical Constants.Mind,108
26. Wittgenstein, L.,Pears, D.(Trans.),McGuinness, B.(Trans.)(1974).Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.New York:Routledge.
27. 張留華(2012).皮爾士哲學的邏輯面向.上海:上海人民出版社.