题名 |
從《東見錄》論關洛學術異同 |
并列篇名 |
A Treatise on Dongjianlu: The Academic Similarities and Differences between Luo School and Guan School |
作者 |
王明華(Minghua WANG) |
关键词 |
東見 ; 清虛一大 ; 心小性大 ; 養氣 ; Dongjian ; Purity and Vacuity ; Small Heart and Great Nature ; The Cultivation of Qi |
期刊名称 |
哲學與文化 |
卷期/出版年月 |
50卷4期(2023 / 04 / 01) |
页次 |
147 - 163 |
内容语文 |
繁體中文;英文 |
中文摘要 |
程門四先生之中,惟呂與叔由關入洛,所記《東見錄》一書,奠定了其學術地位。《東見錄》所記甚富,而其中尤為重要者,乃二程評議關學,展現了其學術異同。二程對關學之評議,集中體現在三方面:清虛一大、心小性大及以養氣為助。此三方面構成一整體,即天理、太虛之差異,作為其根源之分歧,造成心性、工夫之別。具體而言,關學之清虛較氣為大,則性亦較心為大,而洛學主氣之外無理,故心性乃為一本;又,關學以虛靜則無物累,則欲舍動而求靜,而洛學以為「敬則自虛靜」,故不必更求養氣。關洛雖有此差異,然其要皆為辟佛,故太虛之於天理,亦可謂未達一間也。 |
英文摘要 |
Among the two Cheng Master's four most important students, Lv Yushu is the only one from Guan school. Dongjianlu, the masterpiece in which Lv Yushu records the two Cheng Masters' quotations, establishes his academic status within Luo school and Guan school. Among the rich records, the two Cheng Master's comments on Guan school is the most central part, showing the academic similarities and differences between the two schools. The two Cheng Masters' comments are mainly reflected in three aspects: purity and vacuity, heart is small heart and great nature, the cultivation of Qi. These three aspects, considered as an integral whole, shows the difference between Luo school's Li and Guan School's Great void. This is the ultimate disparity between the two schools, which is resulted from the differences of heart-nature and the method of cultivation. To be specific, compared with Guan school who believes that the Great void is greater than Qi and the nature is greater than the heart, Luo school believes that there is no Li beyond Qi, so the heart and nature can never be inseparable. Furthermore, Guan school believes that one won't be encumbered by things by keeping himself in vacuity and quiescence, therefore they should cultivate themselves in quiescence instead of in movement. In contrast to this, Luo school believes that one will be in vacuity and quiescence as soon as he cultivates himself in the method of Jing, so it is not necessary to seek more cultivation of Qi. Although there are so many differences between the two schools, both of them are converted in attacking Buddhism. Therefore, the difference between the Great void and Li eventually turns out to be subtle. |
主题分类 |
人文學 >
人文學綜合 |
参考文献 |
|