從華人輔理主教的設置看民國天主教本地教會的建設與革新

On Construction and Renewal of the Local Catholic Church in Modern China-A Case Study of the First Placement of Chinese Auxiliary Bishops

李蓬雲(Pengyun LI)

民國天主教史 ； 華籍神父 ； 主教任命 ； 天主教本地化 ； History of Catholicism during the Era of Republic of China ； Chinese Priests ； Bishop Appointment ； The Indigenization of Catholicism

哲學與文化

50卷4期（2023 / 04 / 01）

165 - 179

繁體中文;英文

1931年羅馬教廷任命楊福爵為天主教廣州代牧區輔理主教。由於相關史料流失海外，楊福爵及此次任命長期不為學界所關注。此次增設最早來自1926年廣州代牧巍暢茂的建言。它的出現受到了「非基督教運動」等廣州社會運動，以及20世紀上半葉羅馬教廷主導的天主教本地化運動的共同推動。此次華人輔理主教的設置曲折歷程折射了民國時期來華傳教士對於教會與社會二者關係的不同思考，對於本地教會的建設路徑的不同認知。它們在中國天主教史上具有一定典型性。巍暢茂作為此次華人主教設置的關鍵人物，他的前瞻性思考在今天仍有價值與意義。

In 1931, the Roman Catholic Church appointed Bonifacius Yeung as the auxiliary bishop of the Vicariate Apostolic of Guangzhou. Due to the fact that relevant historical documents have remained overseas, little attention to Yeung and his appointment has been given by Chinese scholars. This appointment was first proposed by Antoine Fourquet in 1926, promoted by the Non-Christian Movement and other social movements in Guangzhou, as well as the indigenization of Catholicism led by the Roman Catholic Church in the first half of the 20th century. The twists and turns of the installation of the Chinese auxiliary bishop reflect the divided views on relation between the Church and local society among the missionaries in China during the era of Republic of China. It also indicates the different considerations of the route in developing the local Church. The event is exemplary in the history of Catholicism in the Republic of China. Antoine Fourquet, as a key figure in this event, his forward thinking still has value and relevance today.

1. 陳聰銘(2017)。從光若翰巡閱使的報告看國籍教士地位與擢升國籍主教之問題。哲學與文化，44(11)，83-106。
   連結：
2. Canton Archive, Ricci Institute, Boston College:F4.5: “Celsi Costantini, Apostolic Delegation in China”.
3. Archivio Storico di Propaganda Fide (ASPF): Indice generale 1926-1931.
4. 〈楊主教晉升典禮情形〉，《廣州公教青年》1(1931): 116-117。
5. Canton Archive, Ricci Institute, Boston College:F7.33: “Fr. Fourquet”.
6. 〈聖心學生二次宣言〉，《中國青年》38.2(1924): 14-15。
7. Canton Archive, Ricci Institute, Boston College:F10.25: “Antoine Fourquet”.
8. Archives Missions É trangères de Paris (AMEP): Vol. Q 555-158 : “Mrg. Fourquet compte-rendu 1925-1926”.
9. Canton Archive, Ricci Institute, Boston College:F4.7: “Reports from Msgrs. Mérel & Chausse, Fr. Fleureau to Apostolic Delegation in Beijing, MEP in Paris”.
10. Canton Archive, Ricci Institute, Boston College:F4.6: “Internuntiatura Apostolica, Apostolic Delegation in Beijing, Marius Zanin, Antoine Riberi”.
11. Canton Archive, Ricci Institute, Boston College: F3.1: “Propaganda Fide”.
12. Canton Archive, Ricci Institute, Boston College:F10.17: “Fr. Depierre”.
13. 為促進宣傳聖教事：教宗訓論.北京:公教教務聯合會.
14. Burke, Martin. “Bishop Boniface Yeung,” The Field Afar 12(1931): 329.
15. de Guébriant, J. “A NN. SS. les évêques et aux missionnaires de la Société des Missions-É trangères de Paris,” Bulletin de la Société des Missions-É trangères de Paris 55(1926): 392.
16. Ticozzi, Sergio(2014).Ending Civil Patronage: The Beginning of a New Era for the Catholic Missions in China,1926.Catholicism in China, 1900-Present: The Development of the Chinese Church,New York:
17. 方志欽（編）,蔣祖緣（編）(2014).廣東通史——現代上冊.廣州:廣東高等教育出版社.
18. 李蓬雲(2021)。民國時期兩廣地區首位華籍主教楊福爵生平考述。肇慶學院學報，42(1)，8-14。
19. 陳家文,黃穗生(1986)。大革命時期廣州學生反基督教和收回教育權運動。廣東文史資料，廣州:
20. 陶飛亞(2005).邊緣的歷史——基督教與近代中國.上海:上海古籍出版社.
21. 楊天宏(2005).基督教與民國知識分子.北京:人民出版社.
22. 劉國鵬(2011).剛恆毅與中國天主教的本地化.北京:社會科學文獻出版社.