羅浩「沉思實踐」視域中的《莊子》生命之思

Reflections on Life in the Zhuangzi through Roth's Perspective of Contemplative Practice

馬珊珊(Shan-Shan MA)

羅浩 ； 沉思詮釋學 ； 沉思實踐 ； 莊子 ； 認知調適 ； 生命整全性 ； Roth ； Contemplation Hermeneutics ； Contemplative Practice ； the Zhuangzi ； Cognitive Attunement ； The Wholeness of Life

哲學與文化

50卷12期（2023 / 12 / 01）

157 - 170

繁體中文;英文

布朗大學羅浩教授認為整個道家文本譜系中存在關於沉思靜坐（如「心齋」）的實踐和理論一以貫之，尤以《莊子》為典範和成熟形態。他主張對莊子道家之學派、哲學、工夫、文本形成等方面的理解，都應同步於這種沉思實踐，以更新對早期道家傳統之歷史源流的認識。羅浩結合「沉思詮釋學」形式和「沉思現象學」視域，指出莊學作為典型「道家沉思學」，要旨在於「認知調適」。透視羅浩莊子哲學觀可知，其莊子沉思論之終旨乃是對萬物生命之整全性的不懈追求，藉此顯示莊學實乃一門深邃複雜的生命之學。這也反映於羅浩在哲學研究方式上積極吸納沉思實證方法，以使對莊子的哲學認知更為客觀。

Roth argues that there is one principle of contemplative practices throughout the genealogy of early Daoist texts and exemplified by the Zhuangzi. It is contended that the meaning of "school", "philosophy", "cultivation" and texts formation should be synchronized with the contemplative practice in order to restore the real of Daoist origin. Through contemplative hermeneutics and combining with contemplative phenomenology, Roth reasons that Zhuangzi's thought, which as a typical Daoist contemplation, aimed at cognitive attunement. Roth shows that the fundamental concerns of Zhuangzi's contemplation is the wholeness of life. It determines that the study of Daoist philosophy should incorporate contemplative practices to achieve more objective understanding of the Zhuangzi.

1. James, William(1982).The Varieties of Religious Experience.New York:Penguin Books.
2. Kohn, Livia(2014).Zhuangzi: Text and Context.Cambridge:Three Pines Press.
3. Ma, Shanshan(2023).The Religiousness of Cultivation in the Zhuangzi: ‘The Unity of Self’ of Zuowang 坐忘.Religions,14(5),612.
4. Roth, Harold D.(2021).The Contemplative Foundations of Classical Daoism.New York:SUNY Press.
5. Roth, Harold D.(1999).Original Tao: Inward Training (Nei-Yeh) and the Foundations of Taoist Mysticism.New York:Columbia University Press.
6. Wallace, B. Alan(2008).A Response to ‘Against Cognitive Imperialism’.Religion East & West,8,27-32.
7. 史泰司,楊儒賓（譯）(1998).冥契主義與哲學.臺北:中正書局.
8. 馬珊珊(2022)。以內修實踐為本源的道家傳統——羅浩道家神秘主義之檢視。哲學評論，29，233-251。
9. 湯一介（編）(2005).沈清松自選集.濟南:山東教育出版社.
10. 關永中(1989)。神秘主義及其四大型態。當代，36，39-48。