審議式民主的公共新聞想像：建構審議公共議題的新聞報導模式

Imagining Public Journalism in Deliberative Democracy: Constructing a News Reporting Model for Deliberating Public Issues

10.30386/MCR.200504_(83).0002

黃惠萍(Hui-Ping Huang)

審議式民主 ； 公共新聞學 ； 衝突框架 ； 審議式新聞報導 ； deliberative democracy ； public journalism ； conflict frame ； deliberative reporting

新聞學研究

83期（2005 / 04 / 01）

39 - 81

繁體中文

晚近在政治哲學及新聞學領域分別興起一股對傳統的反思，前者針對代議式民主的缺失提出審議式民主理論，後者則針對傳統新聞菁英中心的報導型式，提出旨在強化公民文化的公共新聞學理念。兩者均強調公民在政治決定中的主體性，在實踐上也有互助之處。審議式民主論者提出，政治決定的過程必須符合公開、平等、非專制與相互性的原則。在此過程中，新聞媒體扮演重要的角色，它應促使公共論述的內涵符合這些原則，才能協助建立社會的審議文化。而公共新聞學從公民的關切層面著手，其案例提供了鑲嵌審議式民主理念的機會。本文汲取審議式民主的內涵及公共新聞的經驗，提出一適用於爭議性公共議題的審議式新聞報導模式。這項模式從公民的關懷出發，藉由呈現多元的論證及理據，使報導內容更具辯證性，以期跳脫主流的衝突框架，培養公民對歧見的包容度，與對公共議題的審慎思辨能力。

A trend of reflexive thoughts on political philosophy and journalism has emerged recently. While the theory of deliberative democracy aims at rectifying problems of representative democracy, public journalism intends to replace traditional elite-centered reporting with a practice targeted at restoring civic culture. Both ideas emphasize the subjectivity of citizens in political decisions. The practice of deliberative democracy requires publicity, equality, nontyranny and reciprocity. Public journalism offers the opportunities to implement these principles. Inspired by the possible synergy, this study proposes a deliberative reporting model. The model starts from citizens’ concerns and focuses on reporting pluralistic argumentations and justifications of a controversial public issue. It aims to counteract the dominant conflict frames and to enable citizens to live with disagreement and to deliberate public issues.

1. Bell, D. A.(1999).Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement.New York:Oxford University Press.
2. Benhabib, S.(1994).Deliberative rationality and models of democratic legitimacy.Constellations,1,26-52.
3. Does public journalism work? The Campaign Central experience
4. Bohman, J.(1996).Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
5. Bohman, J.(2000).Public journalism and political knowledge.Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
6. Bowers, J. R.,Claflin, B.,Walker, G.(1998).the 1998 annual meeting of the New England Political Science Association.Worcester, MA:
7. Brooks, B. S.,Kennedy, G.,Moen, D. R.,Ranly, D.(1995).News reporting & writing.New York:St. Martin's Press.
8. Cappella, J. A.,Jamieson, K. H.(1997).Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good.Oxford University Press:New York.
9. Chouliaraki, L.(2000).Political discourse in the news: democratizing responsibility or aestheticizing politics?.Discourse & Society,11,293-315.
10. Cohen, J.(1989).The good polity: Normative analysis of the state.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
11. Cohen, J.(1996).Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
12. Dahl, R. A.(1997).On deliberative democracy.Dissent,44,54-58.
13. de Vreese, C. H.,Peter, J.,Semetko, H. A.(2001).Framing politics at the launch of the Euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news.Political Communication,18,107-122.
14. Deway, J.(1927).The public and its problems.New York:Holt-Rinehart & Winston.
15. Donohue, G. A.,Olien, C. N.,Tichenor, P. J.(1985).Reporting conflict by pluralism, newspaper type and ownership.Journalism Quarterly,62,489-499.
16. Dzur, A. W.(2002).Public journalism and deliberative democracy.Polity,34,313-336.
17. Eksterowicz, A. J.(2000).Public journalism and political knowledge.Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield.
18. Elster, J.(1998).Deliberative democracy.New York:Cambridge University Press..
19. Fallows, J.(1996).Breaking the news: How the news media undermine American democracy.New York:Pantheon.
20. Fishkin, J. S.(1995).The voice of the people.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
21. Fishkin, J. S.(1991).Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
22. Fishkin, J. S.,Luskin, R.(1999).The poll with a human face: The National Issues Convention experiment in political communication.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Friedland, L. A.(2000).Public journalism and political knowledge.Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
24. Public journalism: A new approach to citizenship
25. Gamson, W. A.(1992).Talking politics.New York:Cambridge University Press.
26. Gamson, W. A.,Modigliani, A.(1989).Media discourse and public opinion: A constructionist approach.American Journal of Sociology,95,1-37.
27. Goidel, R. K.(2000).Public journalism and political knowledge.Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield.
28. Grundahl, J.(1995).Public participation in science: The role of consensus conferences in Europe.London:Science Museum.
29. Gutmann, A.,Thompson, D.(1996).Democracy and disagreement.Cambridge, MA:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
30. Gutmann, A.,Thompson, D.(1998).Deliberative democracy.Liberal Education,84,10-17.
31. Habermas, J.(1989).The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
32. Hardin, R.(1999).Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement.New York:Oxford University Press.
33. MacDougall, C.(1982).Interpretive reporting.New York:Macmillan.
34. Massey, B. L.,Haas, T.(2002).Does making journalism more public make a difference?  A critical review of evaluative research on public journalism.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,79,559-586.
35. Merritt, D.(1995).Public journalism and public life: Why telling the news is not enough.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Meyer, P.,Potter, D.(2000).Election polls, the news media and democracy.New York:Chatham House Publishers.
37. Neuman, W. R.,Just, M. R.,Crigler, A. N.(1992).Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
38. Patterson, T. E.(1994).Out of order.New York:Vintage Books.
39. Pew Center for Civic Journalism(2002).Civic journalism: A living legacy.Washington, DC:Author.
40. Price, V.(1989).Social identification and public opinion: Effects of communicating group conflict.Public Opinion Quarterly,53,197-224.
41. Rawls, J.(1996).Deliberative democracy.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
42. Rosen, J.(1999).What are journalists for?.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
43. Rosen, J.(1999).The idea of public journalism.New York:The Guilford Press.
44. Rosen, J.(1996).Getting the connections right: Public journalism and the troubles in the press.New York:The Twentieth Century Fund, Inc.
45. Thorson, E.,Friedland, L. A.,Anderson, P.(1997).Civic lessons: Report on four public journalism projects.Washington, DC:Pew Center for Civic Journalism.
46. Young, I. M.(2000).Inclusion and democracy.New York:Oxford University Press.
47. 方怡文、周慶祥(1999)。新聞採訪理論與實務。台北:正中。
48. 林水波、石振國(1999)。以直接民主改革間接民主的論述與評估。立法院院聞月刊，27，33-44。
49. 許國賢(2000)。商議式民主與民主想像。政治科學論叢，13，61-92。
50. 陳憶寧(2001)。總統候選人攻擊性新聞報導與其支持度關聯：以公元兩千年總統大選為例。新聞學研究，69，113-140。
51. 陳憶寧(2003)。當天然災難可能成為政治災難：策略框架效果再探。中華傳播學刊，3，3-35。
52. 黃惠萍(2003)。媒介框架之預設判準效應與閱聽人的政策評估—以核四案為例。新聞學研究，77，67-105。

1. 蔡琰、臧國仁(2013)。大眾傳播研究之敘事取向―另一後設理論思路之提議。中華傳播學刊，23，159-193。
2. 曾建元、周珮甄(2016)。開放政府之理念與實踐─初探臺北市柯文哲政府。中華行政學報，18，97-113。
3. 曾志隆、陳朝政(2012)。論穆芙對審議式民主的批判。東吳政治學報，30(1)，81-134。
4. 陳儀芬、孫秀蕙(2009)。台灣電視政論節目的詩題論述策略：以「真調會覆議案大法官關說疑雲」爲例。中華傳播學刊，16，45-92。
5. 陳昱名,連家萱,李永隆(2021)。政治民主化對社會福利建構方向之影響－戰後到2016年臺灣與新加坡老年福利政策與法規實踐發展探討。台日法政研究，6，77-123。
6. 胡元輝(2014)。更審議的公民，更開放的公共─公共新聞與公民新聞相互關係的思考。新聞學研究，119，81-120。
7. 劉華美,陳璽尹,高佩懃,徐美苓,周桂田(2020)。在專家、媒體與公眾之間：作為科技風險溝通途徑的新興科技媒體中心。傳播研究與實踐，10(1)，51-78。
8. 劉平君(2010)。解構新聞／真實：反現代性位置的新聞研究觀。新聞學研究，105，85-126。
9. 呂傑華(2011)。聽誰在說話？─我國報紙投書版之南台灣社群投書現象之研究。長榮大學學報，15(1)，1-30。
10. 徐美苓(2021)。從公眾角度再思科技政策的媒體建構：以《電業法》修法為例。傳播研究與實踐，11(1)，105-140。
11. 徐美苓(2023)。臺灣能源轉型爭議論述的媒體建構：減碳、非核家園與空污防制的風險傳播多重難題。新聞學研究，154，1-54。
12. 徐美苓、林筱芸(2015)。臺灣基因醫學新聞內容特色與品質分析 （2001-2011 年）。博物館學季刊，29(1)，65-77。
13. 張簡妙琳,范玫芳(2021)。從審議系統觀點探討臺灣邵族傳統領域治理與公民行動。臺灣民主季刊，18(2)，37-77。
14. (2015)。新興環境議題的媒體建構：以台灣替代能源新聞報導為例。傳播與社會學刊，32，19-57。