電視談話性節目研究－來賓、議題結構及閱聽人特質分析

A Study of Television Political Talk Shows: Issue Selections, Guest Structures and Audience Characteristics

10.30386/MCR.200507_(84).0005

盛治仁(Emile C. J. Sheng)

叩應節目 ； 叩應經驗 ； 來賓結構 ； 談話性節目 ； 閱聽人特質 ； call-in program ； call-in experience ； guest structure ； talk shows ； audience characteristics

新聞學研究

84期（2005 / 07 / 01）

163 - 203

繁體中文

本研究以電視談話性節目之內容分析、製作人訪談與閱聽眾電話問卷調查等研究法，分析2002年北高市長選舉前後此類節目之議題與來賓資料。結果發現：立委與記者是談話性節目的主力；且節目中偏好討論選舉與政黨議題，忽略政府效能與內政等政策議題。此外，政治知識較低、政治興趣高、親民黨認同者及男性較常叩應；政治知識較高、政治興趣高、常與人討論政治、對總統施政不滿意、認同親民黨與年長者較常收視談話性節目。本研究最後針對研究結果進行分析討論，並對未來研究提出具體的可行方向與建議。

This study aims to analyze the issue selections, guest structures, and audience characteristics of all nightly television talk shows three months before and after the 2002 Taipei and Kaohsiung mayoral elections. Both a content analysis and a telephone survey are used in the study, with the former being supplemented by informal personal interviews with program producers. The results show that legislators and journalists comprise the major sources of the talk show guests. Election-related topics are discussed most frequently, followed by party-related topics. Issues related to government efficiency and domestic policy, however, are the least frequently discussed. Furthermore, those who most often call into the programs tend to be men identified with the People-First Party (PFP) with stronger political interests, but a lower level of political knowledge. Those who regularly watch the talk shows, on the other hand, tend to be older PFP-identifying people with stronger interests and higher levels of political knowledge. They also are apt to discuss politics more and be less satisfied with the President's performance. The study ends with a discussion of the implications and future research directions of the findings.

1. 張卿卿(2002)。競選媒體使用對選民競選議題知識與政治效能感的影響—以兩千年總統大選為例。選舉研究，9（1），1-39。
   連結：
2. 陳陸輝(2001)。新局的開端，2001年選舉研究學術研討會。台北:政治大學選舉研究中心。
   連結：
3. Abramson, P. R.,Aldrich, J. H.(1982).The decline of electoral participation in America.The American Political Science Review,76,502-521.
4. Appel, E. C.(2003).Rush to jugdment: Burlesque, tragedy, and hierarchal alchemy in the rhetoric of America's foremost political talkshow host.The Southern Communication Journal,68（3）,217-230.
5. Armstrong, C.,Rubin, A.(1989).Talk radio as interpersonal communication.Journal of Communication,39,84-94.
6. Avery, R.,Ellis, D.,Glover, T.(1978).Patterns of communication on talk radio.Journal of Broadcasting,22,5-18.
7. Barker, D. C.(1999).Rushed decisions: Political talk radio and vote choice, 1994-1996.Journal of Politics,61,527-539.
8. Barker, D. C.(1998).Rush to action: Political talk radio and health care (un)reform.Political Communication,15,83-97.
9. Barker, D. C.(2002).Rushed to judgment: Talk radio, persuasion, and American political behavior.New York:Columbia University Press.
10. Barker, D. C.,Knight, K.(2000).Political talk radio and public opinion.Public Opinion Quarterly,64（2）,149-170.
11. Baum, M. A.,Kernell, S.(1999).Has cable ended the golden age of presidential television?.The American Political Science Review,93（1）,99-114.
12. Becker, T.(1978).Anticipatory democracy: People in the politics of the future.New York:Random House.
13. Bennett, S. E.(1998).Political talk radio's relationships with democratic citizenship.American Review of Politics,19,17-30.
14. Bennett, S. E.(2002).American's exposure to political talk radio and their knowledge of public affair.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,46（1）,72-86.
15. Blumer, H.(1946).Collective behavior.New York:Barnes and Noble.
16. Campbell, A.,Gurin, G.,Miller, W. E.(1954).The voter decides.Evanston, IL:Row, Peterson.
17. Cappella, J. N.,Jamieson, K. H.(1997).Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good.New York:Oxford University Press.
18. Citrin, J.(1974).Comment: The political relevance of trust in government.The American Political Science Review,68,973-988.
19. Citrin, J.,Green, D. P.(1986).British Journal of Political Science.
20. Citrin, J.,Muste, C.(1999).Measures of political attitudes.CA:San Diego Press.
21. Converse, P. E.(1972).The human meaning of social change.New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
22. Crouse, T.(1972).The boys on the bus: Riding with the campaign press corps.New York:Random House.
23. Davis, R.,Owen, D.(1998).New media and American politics.New York:Oxford University Press.
24. Glynn, C. J.,Herbst, S.,O’Keefe, G. J.,Shapiro, R. Y.(1999).Public opinion.Boulder, CO:Westview.
25. Graber, D. A.(1997).Understanding public opinion.Washington, DC:C. Q. Press.
26. Grosswiler, P.(1998).Historical hopes, media fears, and the electronic town meeting concept: Where technology meets democracy or demagogy?.Journal of Communication Inquiry,22（2）,133-151.
27. Gumpert, G.,Cathcart, R.(1982).InterMedia.New York:Oxford University Press.
28. Herbst, S.(1995).On electronic public space: Talk shows in theoretical prespective.Political Communication,12（3）,263-274.
29. Herman, E.,Chomsky, N.(1988).Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media.New York:Pantheon.
30. Hetherington, M. J.(1998).The political relevance of political trust.The American Political Science Review,92,791-808.
31. Hirsch, A.(1991).Talking heads: Political talk shows and their star pundits.New York:St. Martin's Press.
32. Hofstetter, R. C.(1998).Political talk radio, situational involvement, and political mobilization.Social Science Quarterly,79,273-286.
33. Hofstetter, R. C.,Barker, D.,Smith, J.,Zari, G. M.,Ingrassia, T. A.(1999).Information, misinformation and political talk radio.Political Research Quarterly,52（2）,353-369.
34. Hollander, B. A.(1996).Talk radio: Predictors of use and effects on attitudes about government.Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly,73,102-113.
35. Hollander, B. A.(1994).Pattern in the exposure and influence of the old news and the new news.Mass Communication Review,21,144-155.
36. Kolbert, E.(1993).The people are heard, at least those who call talk radio.The New York Times.
37. Kurtz, H.(1997).Hot air: All talk, all the time.New York:Times Books.
38. Lee, G. H.,Cappella, J. N.(1998).the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.Baltimore, MD:
39. Lemert, J. B.,Elliott, W. R.,Rosenberg, W. L.,Bernstein, J.(1996).The politics of disenchantment: Bush, Clinton, Perot, and the press.Cresskill, NJ:Hampton Press.
40. Mayer, W. G.(2004).Why talk radio is conservative.Public Interest,156,86-103.
41. McKenzie, R.(2000).Audience involvement in the epideictic discourse of television talk shows.Communication Quarterly,48,190.
42. Miller, A.(1974).Political issues and trust in government.The American Political Science Review,68,951-972.
43. Mondak, J. J.(2001).Developing valid knowledge scales.American Journal of Political Science,45,224-238.
44. Munson, W.(1993).All talk: The talk show in media culture.Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
45. Neuman, W. R.(1991).The future of the mass audience.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
46. Neuman, W. R.(1998).The politics of news: The news of politics.Washington, DC:C. Q. Press.
47. Norris, P.(1996).Does television erode social capital: a reply to Putman.PS, Political Science & Politics,29（3）,474-480.
48. Olsen, M. E.(1969).Two categories of political alienation.Social Forces,47（3）,288-299.
49. Owen, D.(1996).Broken contract? Changing relationship between Americans and their government.Boulder, CO:Westview.
50. Page, B. I.(1996).Who deliberates? Mass media in modern democracy.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
51. Page, B. I.,Tannenbaum, J.(1996).Populist deliberation and talk radio.Journal of Communication,46（2）,33-54.
52. Pan, Z.,Kosicki, G. M.(1997).Talk show exposure as an opinion activity.Political Communication,14,371-388.
53. Pfau, M.,Moy, P.,Robert, R. L.,Szabo, E. A.,Lin, W.,Zhang, W.(1998).The influence of political talk radio on confidence in democratic institutions.Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly,75,730-745.
54. Rehm, D.(1995).Radio - The forgotten medium.New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction.
55. Rosenstone, S. J.,Hansen, J. M.(1993).Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America.New York:Macmillan.
56. Rosenthal, A.(1992).Bush considers following his rivals on TV talk programs.The New York Times,.
57. Sigal, L. V.(1973).Reporters and officials.Lexington, MA:D.C. Health.
58. Thompson, D. F.(1970).The democratic citizen: Social science and democratic theory in the twentieth century.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
59. Timberg, B. M.,Erler, R. J.(2002).Television talk: A history of the TV talk show.Austin, TX:University of Texas Press.
60. Times Mirror Center for the People & the Press.(1993).The vocal minority in American politics.Los Angeles:Times Mirror Center for the People & the Press.
61. Tolson, A.(2001).Television talk shows: Discourse, performance, spectacle.Makwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
62. Traugott, M.,Berinsky, A.,Cramer, K.,Howard, M.,Mayer R.,Schuckman, H. P.,Tewksbury, D.,Young, M.(1996).the meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology.Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada:
63. Watts, M. W.(1973).Efficacy, trust and commitment to the political process.Social Science Quarterly,54,623-631.
64. Weber, B.(1992).A loud, angry world on the dial.The New York Times.
65. Yanovitzky, I.,Cappella, J. N.(2001).Effect of call-in political talk radio shows on their audiences: Evidence from a multi-wave panel analysis.International Journal of Public Opinion Research,13(4),377-397.
66. 江子芽(2001)。李濤會把台灣帶到哪裡去。財訊。
67. 周進發(1986)。我國選民政治信任感與投票抉擇關聯性研究—民國七十四年嘉義市長選舉個案分析。政治大學政治研究所。
68. 林嘉誠(1980)。台北地區大學生的政治態度與政治參與。台灣大學政治學研究所。
69. 洪秀瑛(2004)。麥擱吵啊！收視率大退燒。中時晚報。
70. 胡佛(1992)。政治學的科學探究（二）：政治文化與政治生活。台北:三民。
71. 陳孝凡(2003)。台灣奇蹟—政論節目，每週860萬人次看。中時晚報。
72. 陳義彥(1993)。選民對政府的信任感，選舉行為與台灣地區的政治民主化：從第二屆立法委員選舉探討。台北:政治大學政治系。
73. 彭芸(2001)。新媒介與政治。台北:五南。
74. 楊意菁(2004)。民意與公共性：批判解讀台灣電視談話節目。新聞學研究，79，1-47。

1. 蔡鴻濱(2011)。從語藝觀點探討荒誕宗教廣播節目之認同策略。傳播研究與實踐，1(2)，211-243。
2. 蔡琰、臧國仁(2017)。數位時代的「敘事傳播」：兼論新科技對傳播學術思潮的可能影響。新聞學研究，131，1-48。
3. 陳淑貞、胡幼偉、林政谷、林佩霓(2008)。台灣電視政論性「叩應」節目觀眾特質分析。選舉評論，4，21-39。
4. 陳儀芬、孫秀蕙(2009)。台灣電視政論節目的詩題論述策略：以「真調會覆議案大法官關說疑雲」爲例。中華傳播學刊，16，45-92。
5. 洪雅慧(2009)。北、高網路選民大不同？—媒介使用、媒介重要性評估與政治犬儒主義、投票行為之關連性研究。東吳政治學報，27(2)，1-45。
6. 劉正山、朱淑華(2012)。不中間的中間選民：以質性方法初探有政黨傾向選民隱藏政黨傾向的原因。東吳政治學報，30(4)，177-233。
7. 龍希文,蔡楨永,林家安,龍希文,蔡楨永,林家安(2019)。高齡者面對網路謠言困境之探討。國際數位媒體設計學刊，11(1)，53-59。
8. 羅文輝、張卿卿(2007)。追求知識、認同或娛樂？政論性談話節目的內容與閱聽眾收視動機的探討。新聞學研究，93，83-139。
9. 唐士哲(2012)。電視政論與政／媒互動實踐初探。傳播研究與實踐，2(1)，109-134。
10. 唐士哲(2014)。從政治化媒介到媒介化政治：電視政論節目作為制度化的政治實踐。中華傳播學刊，25，3-41。