多元資訊環境中之受衆如何建構城市形象－從珠海看澳門

The Impact of Media Use on Zhuhai Audiences' Perceived City Image of Macao

10.30386/MCR.200510_(85).0002

楊洸(Guang Yang)；陳懷林(Huai-Lin Chen)

人際傳播 ； 媒體使用 ； 受眾調查 ； 城市形象 ； 涵化研究 ； 跨境傳播 ； city image ； cultivation analysis ； cross-border communication ； China study ； media effects ； media credibility

新聞學研究

85期（2005 / 10 / 01）

31 - 70

繁體中文

本研究採用大規模受眾抽樣調查，探索大眾傳播與人際傳播對城市形象的影響，按人口比例多階集群的抽樣方法隨機抽取了l,006位珠海居民，並進行入戶訪問。資料分析結果顯示，在珠海之多元化傳媒資訊體系中，本地媒體仍然是市民賴以瞭解澳門的主要資訊管道，且普遍對澳門持有正面印象。 本研究發現，在解釋人們的城市形象觀念形成時，「媒體內容的關注度」與「媒體的可信度」較「媒體使用時間」更具影響力。在檢驗了非典型涵化模式與一系列研究假設之後，我們發現人們的第一級城市形象觀念（外在、具體形象）與其第二級城市形象觀念（內在、總體形象）關係緊密，此分析結果部分支持本研究之非典型涵化模式與研究假設。

This study explores a new topic-city image-in the field of communication research. With a multi-stage cluster sampling process, over 1,000 Zhuhai residents were randomly selected and then interviewed face to face. The findings reveal that Zhuhai residents hold a fairly positive image of Macao, and in a multiple channel message system the local media are still the major source through which they learn about their neighbor Macao. At the explanative level, the study finds that media attention and media credibility are much more powerful predictors for perceived city image than that of media exposure. After testing a new atypical Cultivation Analysis model and a set of hypotheses, we do find that people's first-order city images (specific impressions) are closely connected with their second-order city images (general perceptions and acceptance of city symbols). The proposed model and hypotheses are partially supported. We believe these findings are meaningful both academically and practically.

1. 珠海資訊網
2. 統計暨普查局網頁
3. 珠海統計資訊網
4. 澳門特區政府入口網站
5. Avraham, E.(2000).Cities and their news images.Cities,17,363-370.
6. Boyd-Barrett, O.,Braham, P.(1987).Media, knowledge & power.London:Croom Helm.
7. Browne, D. R.(1967).Problems in international television.Journal of Communication,17,198-210.
8. Caneday, L.,Zeiger, J.(1991).Journal of Travel Research.
9. Condry, J.(1989).The psychology of television.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Cook, T. D.,Flay, B. R.(1978).Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 11.New York:Academic Press.
11. Cotton, J. L.(1985).Selective exposure to communication.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Ettema, J. S.,Peer, L.(1995).Good news from a bad neighborhood: Toward an alternative to the discourse of urban pathology.Journalism Quarterly,73,835-856.
13. Foot, J. M.(1999).From boomtown to bribesville: The images of the city, Milan, 1980-97.Urban History,26,393-412.
14. Fredin, E. S,Kosicki, G. M.(1989).Cognitions and attitudes about community: compensating for media images.Journalism Quarterly,66,571-578.
15. Galician, M.,Vestre, N. D.(1987).Effects of “good news” and “bad news” on newscast image and community image.Journalism Quarterly,64,399-405.
16. Gerbner, G.,Gross, L.(1976).Living with television: The violence profile.Journal of Communication,26,172-199.
17. Gerbner, G.,Gross, L.,Morgan, M.,Signorielli, N.(1994).Media effects: Advances in theory and research.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
18. Gerbner, G.,Gross, L.,Morgan, M.,Signorielli, N.(1980).The “mainstreaming” of America: Violence profile No. 11.Journal of Communication,30,11-29.
19. Gerbner, G.,Gross, L.,Morgan, M.,Signorielli, N.(1986).Perspectives on media effects.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Gilling, P. M.,Greenwald, A. G.(1974).Is it time to lay the sleeper effect to rest? Journal of Perspective.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,29,132-139.
21. Goonasekara, A.(1987).The influence of television on cultural values -- with special reference to third world countries.Media Asia,14,7-12.
22. Hadad, J.(1978).Media and international misunderstanding.Phaedras,5,17-19.
23. Hawkins, R. P.,Pingree, S.(1990).Cultivation analysis: New directions in media effects research.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
24. Hawkins, R. P.,Pingree, S.(1982).Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties, Vol. 2. Technical reviews.Rockville, MD:National Institute of Mental Health.
25. Hirsch, P. M.(1980).The “scary world” of the nonviewer and other anomalies: A reanalysis of Gerbner et al.'s findings of cultivation analysis, part1.Communication Research,7,403-456.
26. Hirsch, P. M.(1981).Distinguishing good speculation from bad theory: Rejoinder to Gerbner et al.Communication Research,8,73-95.
27. Hirsch, P. M.(1981).On not learning from one's own mistakes: A reanalysis of Gerbner's findings on cultivation analysis.Communication Research,8,3-37.
28. Hovland, C. I.,Weiss, W.(1951).The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness.Public Opinion Quarterly,15,633-650.
29. Jurowski, C.,Uysal, M.,Williams, D. R.(1997).A theoretical analysis of host community residents reactions to tourism.Journal of Travel Research,36,3-11.
30. Jutla, R. S.(2000).Visual image of the city: tourists’ versus residents’ perception of Simla, a hill station in northern India.Tourism Geographies,4,404-420.
31. Kavallins, I.,Pizam, A.(1994).The environmental impact of tourism – Whose responsibility is it anyway? The case study of Mykonos.Journal of Travel Research,36,26-31.
32. Klapper, J. T.(1957).What we know about the effects of mass communication: The brink of hope.Public Opinion Quarterly,21,453-474.
33. Kunczic, M.(1997).Images of nations and international public relations.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Larkham, P. J.(1997).Remaking cities: Images, control, and postwar replanning in the United Kingdom.Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design,24,741-761.
35. Lawson, R.W.,William, J., Young, T.,Cossens, J.(1998).A comparison of residents’ attitudes towards tourism in 10 New Zealand destinations.Tourism Management,19,247-256.
36. Lee, C. C.(1980).Media imperialism reconsidered.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
37. McGuire, W. J.(1968).Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook.Chicago:Rand-McNally.
38. Mesch, G. S.,Manor, O.(1998).Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment.Environment and Behavior,30,504-519.
39. Morgan, M.,Signorielli, N.(1990).Cultivation analysis: New directions in media effects research.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
40. Rogers, E.,Shoemaker, F.(1971).Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach.New York:Free Press.
41. Ryan, S.,Scotland, A.,Montgomery, D.(1998).Resident attitudes to tourism development: A comparative study between the Rangitikei, New Zealand and Bakewell, United Kingdom.Tourism and Hospitality Research,4,115-130.
42. Saito, S.(1995).the annual meeting of the communication Theory and Methodology Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.Washington, DC:
43. Salwen, M. B.(1991).Cultural imperialism: A media effects approach.Critical Studies in Mass Communication,8,29-38.
44. Schiller, H. I.(1991).Not yet the post-imperialist era.Critical Studies in Mass Communication,8
45. Tilson, D. J.,Stacks, D. W.(1997).Public Relations Review.
46. Tversky, A.,Kahneman, D.(1973).Cognitive Psychology.
47. Yaple. P.,Korzenny, F.(1989).Handbook of international and intercultural communication.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
48. 行政院新聞局(1999)。變遷中的香港：澳門大眾傳播事業。臺北:行政院新聞局?。
49. 燕趙都市報
50. 祝建華(2001)。中文傳播研究之理論化與本土化：以受眾及媒介效果的整合理論為例。新聞學研究，68，1-21。
51. 郭中實、祝建華、陳懷林、俞旭、黃煜(2002)。無孔不入的媒體現實：直接和間接經驗對香港與廣州受眾犯罪觀念的影響。新聞學研究，71，61-74。
52. 陳懷林(2001)。經濟全球化與跨地區文化傳播」學術研討會。香港:香港樹仁學院。

1. 李高財(2010)。從學習觀點評析品德教育的實施。中等教育，61(2)，68-93。
2. 張雅玟、張峻嘉(2017)。城市意象與事件認同─臺中爵士音樂節事件行銷之個案分析。休閒與遊憩研究，9(2)，49-97。
3. (2018)。世界休閒之都——澳門媒體形象中非博彩元素符號研究。澳門研究，89，20-41。