電視改革的第三人效果與新社會運動模式－以大高雄地區民眾意見調查為例

The Third-Person Effect and a New Social Movement Model in Television Reform: A Survey of Residents in Kaohsiung City and County

10.30386/MCR.200704_(91).0002

陳志賢(Chih-Hsien Chen)；陳志萍(Lola C. P. Chen)

第三人效果 ； 新社會運動 ； 路徑分析 ； 電視改革 ； 電視的批判效能感 ； the third-person effect ； new social movement ； path analysis ； television reform ； media efficacy

新聞學研究

91期（2007 / 04 / 01）

35 - 84

繁體中文

本研究主要目的是想瞭解大高雄地區居民對電視與電視改革行動的認知及評價，並探討第三人效果與其他可能影響因素。路徑分析發現：受訪者教育程度愈高、愈具備電視批判效能感、愈不認為電視對自己有太多負面影響、愈自認瞭解電視產業發展者、愈贊同媒體管制看法的民眾，就愈傾向支持電視改革。而單因子變異數分析則顯示，愈認為別人與自己都不太受電視負面影響者可能才是臺灣電視改革的主要支持群體。

The study aims to understand ho the residents in Kaohsiung city and county perceive and evaluate Taiwan's television performance and reform. The third-person effect as also as other possible influential factors are also taken into account and empirically examined in a telephone survey. According to the statistical results of a path analysis, residents with a higher education, media efficacy, and regulatory views tend to support television reform. Contrary to the hypothesis of the third-person effect, the study argues that the less negative impacts on both themselves and others are presumed by those respondents, the more likely that they will support television reform. And social movement model has been tested and suggested as a better approach to comprehend television reform in southern Taiwan.

1. 林麗雲(2003)。坐而言，起而行：「無盟」的實踐。台灣社會研究季刊，50，145-169。
   連結：
2. 洪永泰、國立政治大學選舉研究中心編(2001)。民意調查。台北:五南。
   連結：
3. Carroll, W. K.,Hackett, R. A.(2006).Democratic media activism through the lens of social movement theory.Media, Culture & Society,28(1),83-104.
4. Castells, F.(1978).The social democratic image of society.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
5. Chia, S. C.,Lu, K. H.,Mcleod, D. M.(2004).Sex, lies, and video compact disc: A case study on third-person perception and motivations for media censorship.Communication Research,31(1),109-130.
6. David, P.,Liu, K.,Myser, M.(2004).Methodological artifact or persistent bias?.Communication Research,31(2),206-233.
7. Davison, W. P.(1983).The third-person effect in communication.Public Opinion Quarterly,47,1-13.
8. Eyerman, R.,Jamison, A.(1991).Social movements: A cognitive approach.University Park:The Pennsylvania State University Press.
9. Gamson, W. A.,A. D. Morris (Eds.),C. M. Mueller (Eds.)(1992).Frontiers in social movement theory.New Haven:Yale University Press.
10. Gamson, W. A.,Modigliani, A.(1989).Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power.American Journal of Sociology,95,1-38.
11. People's Weekly World (US)
12. Gunther, A. C.(1995).Overrating the x-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography.Journal of Communication,45,27-38.
13. Gunther, A. C.(1991).What we think others think: Cause and consequence in the third-person effect.Communication Research,18,355-372.
14. Gunther, A. C.,Hwa, A. P.(1996).Public perceptions of television influence and opinions about censorship in Singapore.International Journal of Public Opinion Research,8(3),248-265.
15. Gunther, A. C.,Mundy, P.(1993).Biased optimism and the third-person effect.Journalism Quarterly,70,58-67.
16. Gunther, A. C.,Thorson, E.(1992).Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements: Third-person effects in new domains.Communication Research,19,574-596.
17. Habermas, J.(1987).The theory of communication action.Cambridge:Polity.
18. Hackett, R.(2000).Taking back the media: Notes on the potential for a communicative democracy movement.Studies in Political Economy,63,61-86.
19. Henriksen, L.,Flora, J. A.(1999).Third-person perception and children: Perceived impact of pro- and anti-smoking ads.Communication Research,26,643-665.
20. Herman, E. S.,Chomsky, N.(1988).Manufacturing consent.New York:Pantheon.
21. Hourigan, N.(2001).New social movement theory and minority language television campaigns.European Journal of Communication,16(1),77-100.
22. Jensen, J. D.,Hurley, R. J.(2005).Third-person effects and the environment: Social distance, social desirability, and presumed behavior.Journal of Communication,55(2),242-256.
23. The history of media reform: Scanning the horizon
24. Klandermans, B.(1984).Mobilization and participation: Social psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory.American Journal of Sociology,49,583-600.
25. Lee, C.,Yang, S.(1996).Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.Anaheim, CA.:
26. Lo, V. H.,Paddon, A. R.(1998).Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Journalism and Mass Communication.Baltimore, MD.:
27. McAdam, D.(1982).Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930-1970.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
28. McAdam, D. (Eds.),McCarthy, J. D. (Eds.),Zald, M. N. (Eds.)(1996).Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
29. McCarthy, J. D.,Zald, M. N.(1977).Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory.American Journal of Sociology,82(6),1212-1241.
30. McChesney, R. W.(2004).The problem of the media: U.S. communication politics in the 21st century.NY:Monthly Review Press.
31. Nation
32. McLeod, D. M.,Detenber, B. H.,Eveland, W. P.(2001).Behind the third-person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other.Journal of Communication,51,678-695.
33. Meirick, P. C.(2004).Topic-relevant reference groups and dimensions of distance: Political advertising and first- and third-person effects.Communication Research,31(2),234-255.
34. Melucci, A.(1989).Nomads of the present.Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
35. FAIR
36. Paek, H. J.,Pan, Z. D.,Sun, Y.,Abisaid, J.,Houden, D.(2005).The third-person perception as social judgment: An exploration of social distance and uncertainty in perceived effects of political attack ads.Communication Research,32(2),143-170.
37. Rojas, H.,Shah, D. V.,Faber, R. J.(1996).For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect.International Journal of Public Opinion Research,8,163-186.
38. Salwen, M. B.,Driscoll, P. D.(1997).Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the O. J. Simpson trial.Journal of Communication,47(2),60-78.
39. Scott, B.,McChesney, R. W.,D. Berry (Eds.),J. Theobald (Eds.)(2006).Radical mass media criticism: A cultural genealogy.Montreal:Black Rose Books.
40. Shah, D. V.,Faber, R. J.,Youn, S.(1999).Susceptibility and severity: Perceptual dimensions underlying the third-person effect.Communication Research,26,240-267.
41. Snow, D. A.,Rochford, Jr. E. B.,Worden, S. K.,Benford, R. D.(1986).Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation.American Sociological Review,51,464-481.
42. Starr, J. M.(2000).Air wars: The fight to reclaim public broadcasting.Boston, MA:Beacon Press.
43. Tewksbury, D.,Moy, P.,Weis, D. S.(2004).Preparations for Y2K: Revisiting the behavioral component of the third-person effect.Journal of Communication,54,138-155.
44. Touraine, A.(1988).The return of the actor.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
45. Tsfati, Y.,Cohen, J.(2005).The influence of presumed media influence on democratic legitimacy: The case of Gaza settlers.Communication Research,32(6),794-821.
46. Turner, R.,Killian, L.(1957).Collective behavior.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
47. Wimmer, R.,Dominick, J.(1987).Mass media research: An introduction.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
48. 王甫昌(1996)。台灣反對運動的共識動員，一九七九至一九八九年兩次挑戰高峰的比較。台灣政治學刊，1，129-209。
49. 王振寰(1996)。誰統治台灣？轉型中的國家機器與權力結構。台北:巨流。
50. 何榮幸(1996)。一個自主性新聞專業團體的誕生：記「台灣新聞記者協會」組織過程與實踐經驗。新聞學研究，52，95-108。
51. 李天任譯、藍莘譯(1995)。大眾媒體研究。台北:亞太。
52. 林照真(1999)。當前台灣近似媒體觀察組織的幾個盲點。新聞學研究，60，171-176。
53. 邱皓政(2005)。量化研究與統計分析。台北:五南。
54. 洪裕程(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。東華大學族群關係與文化研究所。
55. 胡幼偉(1998)。傳播訊息的第三人效果。台北:五南。
56. 張茂桂(1994)。民間社會、資源動員與新社會運動：台灣社會運動研究的理論志向。香港社會科學學報，4，33-66。
57. 楊汝椿(1996)。另類記者的媒體改造經驗：兼論內部新聞自由和新聞倫理重建。新聞學研究，52，83-94。
58. 楊國樞、徐正光編、宋文里編(1989)。台灣新興社會運動。台北:巨流。
59. 管中祥、張時健(2005)。新自由主義下的台灣媒體改革運動。台灣史料研究，24，196-236。
60. 羅文輝(2000)。媒介負面內容與社會距離對第三人效果認知的影響。新聞學研究，65，95-129。
61. 羅文輝、牛隆光(2003)。自尊、第三人效果與對限制媒介支持度的關聯性研究。新聞學研究，74，19-44。
62. 羅文輝、林文琪、牛隆光、蔡卓芬(2003)。媒介依賴與媒介使用對選舉新聞可信度的影響：五種媒介的比較。新聞學研究，74，19-44。

1. 陳佳宜、王嵩音(2009)。第三人效果與父母介入子女電視收視行為。新聞學研究，101，279-310。
2. 陳志賢(2015)。家庭權力關係中的第三人效果：數位家庭人我影響評估的性別差異與支持行為分析。新聞學研究，124，117-164。
3. 陳祥(2008)。鎖定特定時空情境變數以提升資料品質：情境研究的理論與實務操作。資訊社會研究，15，233-248。
4. 林聖庭(2014)。臉書使用之第三人效果研究：以壹傳媒交易案為例。資訊社會研究，26，31-62。
5. 林素真(2009)。總統大選公民辯論會之第三人效果。新聞學研究，101，45-88。
6. 林育昇(2011)。置入性行銷新聞的第三人效果。廣播與電視，32，71-107。
7. 彭文正(2007)。第三人效果的理解與疑惑。中華傳播學刊，12，3-52。
8. 張春炎(2009)。媽媽的革命與正義的消費者文化？台灣綠色消費運動初探。傳播與管理研究，9(1)，95-158。
9. (2010)。總統大選負面新聞與第三人效果。傳播與社會學刊，11，71-104。
10. (2011)。學校場域共識動員之研究：以2010桃園縣八德國中霸凌新聞報導為例。教育研究，19，1-18。