题名

幸福家庭的房車:汽車廣告中所再現的理想家庭

并列篇名

Happy Family Car: Ideal Family Represented in Car Advertisements

DOI

10.30386/MCR.200807_(96).0002

作者

陳志賢(Chih-Hsien Chen);蕭蘋(Ping Shaw)

关键词

家庭形象 ; 媒體再現 ; 汽車廣告 ; 符號學分析 ; 迷思 ; familial image ; media representation ; car advertisement ; semiotic analysis ; myth

期刊名称

新聞學研究

卷期/出版年月

96期(2008 / 07 / 01)

页次

45 - 86

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本論文針對台灣近年來的汽車廣告,檢視廣告如何與家庭的文化建構(cultural construct)進行連結。本研究自「台灣CF歷史資料館」與各汽車公司的網站中,收集運用家庭形象在其內容中的汽車廣告,進行策略性的迷思結構分析,以瞭解家庭做為一種符號,是如何在再現的系統與政治中運作。具體而言,本研究探索在汽車廣告中,家庭形象如何被利用為一種說服的工具,將汽車建構成一種愛與幸福的來源,也就是汽車如何被等值化為家庭。尤其是一種中產階級、異性戀的核心家庭如何在廣告中,如何被定義為理想的「幸福」家庭,成為一種主流的家庭再現。最後,本論文也探討,如此單一的、被自然化的家庭意識型態對於與家庭有關的實踐及認同可能有的影響。

英文摘要

This study examined car television commercials broadcast in the last three years in Taiwan to explore how they are related to the cultural construct ”family”. Strategically, we drew upon semiotics in order to understand how family, as a symbol and powerful myth, functions within the politics of representation. Specifically, this study demonstrated how familial images were employed as a means of persuasion that ultimately portrayed the car promoted in commercials as a potential source of love and human happiness-as a place for being a family. A heterosexual, nuclear version of familialism has been defined as an ideal family type. The results led to the conclusion of that such a dominant familial ideology possibly has a profoundly pervasive influence on practices and identities.

主题分类 社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. Adams, J.(1983).The familial image in rhetoric.Communication Quarterly,31,56-61.
  2. Albada, K.(2000).The public and private dialogue about the American family on television.Journal of Communication,50(4),79-110.
  3. Ball, M. S.,Smith, G.(1992).Analyzing visual data.Newsbury Park:Sage.
  4. Banks, M.,Morphy, H(1997).Rethinking visual anthropology.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  5. Barcy, M.,Hanak, K.(1984).Television and the image of the family.Munich, Germany:Stiftung Prix Jeunesse.
  6. Barthes, R.(1977).Image, music, text.Glasgow:Fontana.
  7. Barthes, R.(1972).Mythologies.New York:The Noonday Press.
  8. Berger, J.(1982).Another way of telling.Writers and Readers.
  9. Cobly, P. (Ed.)(2001).The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics.London:Routledge.
  10. Dail, P.,Way, W.(1985).Family Relations.
  11. Deleuze, G.,Guattari, F.,R. Hurley,M. Seem,H. R. Lane,Trans(1977).Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia.New York:Viking.
  12. Douglas, W.,Olson, B. M.(1996).Subversion of the American family?: An examination of children and parents in television families.Communication Research,23,73-99.
  13. Dow, B.(1996).Prime-time feminism: Television, media culture and the women's movement since 1970.PA:University of Pennsylvania Press.
  14. Dyer, G.(1982).Advertising as communication.London:Methuen.
  15. Frith, K. T.,A. N. Valdivia (Ed.)(1995).Feminism, multiculturalism, and the media: Global diversities.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  16. Gerbner, G.,Gross, L.,Morgan, M.,Signorielli, N.(1980).ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 198 919.Washington, DC:White House Conference on the Family, National Research Forum on Family Issues.
  17. Goldman, R.(1992).Reading ads socially.London:Routledge.
  18. Greenberg, B.,D. Pearl,L. Bouthilet,J. Lazar (Eds.)(1982).Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties.Rockville, MD:National Institute of Mental Health.
  19. Greenberg, B.,Hines, M.,Buerkel-Rothfuss, N.,Atkin, C.,B. S. Greenberg (Ed.)(1980).Life on television: Content analyses of U.S. TV drama.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
  20. Greimas, A.J.(1968).The interaction of semiotic constraints.Yale French Studies,41,86-105.
  21. Hall, S.,S. Cohen,L. Young (Eds.)(1973).The manufacture of news.London:Constable.
  22. Heintz, K. E.(1992).Children's favorite television families: A descriptive analysis of role interactions.Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media,36,443-451.
  23. Helmer, J.(1992).Love on bon: How McDonald's won the burger wars.Journal of Popular Culture,26(2),85-97.
  24. Jameson, F.(1990).Signature of the visible.London:Routledge.
  25. Jameson, F.(1988).vol. 2: The syntax of history.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
  26. Jhally, S.(1990).The codes of advertising: Fetishism and the political economy of meaning in the consumer society.New York:Routledge.
  27. Jhally, S.,I. Angus,Sut Jhally (Eds.)(1989).Cultural politics in contemporary America.New York:Routledge.
  28. Jones, M.(1984).Television and the image of the family.Munich, Germany:Stiftung Prix Jeunesse.
  29. Kellner, D.,J. Downing,A. Mohammadi,A. Serberny-Mohammadi (Eds.)(1995).Questioning the media.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  30. Kilbourne, J.(1999).Deadly persuasion: Why women and girls must fight the addictive power of advertising.New York:The Free Press.
  31. Kolodny, A.,E. Showalter (Ed.)(1985).The feminist criticism.New York:Pantheon.
  32. Lacan, J.(1977).Ecrits: A selection..London:Tavistock.
  33. Leiss, W.,Kline, S.,Jhally, S.(1990).products and images of well-being.Ontario:Nelson Canada.
  34. Levi-Strauss, C.,J. Weightman,D. Weightman, Trans.(1969).The raw and the cooked.New York:Harper Torchbook.
  35. Levi-Strauss, C.,M. Layton, Trans(1976).Structural anthropology.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  36. Linne, O.,Nielsen, N.(1984).Television and the image of the family.Munich:Stiftung Prix Jeunesse.
  37. Lipsitz, G.(1986).The meaning of memory: Family, class, and ethnicity in early network television programs.Cultural Anthropology,1(4),355-387.
  38. McNeil, J.(1975).Feminism, femininity, and the television series: A content analysis.Journal of Broadcasting,19,259-269.
  39. Metz, C.,C. Britton, Trans(1982).The inaginary signifier: Psychoanalysis and the cinema.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
  40. O''Barr, W. M.(1994).Culture and the ad: Exploring otherness in the world of ad.Boulder:Westview Press.
  41. Perlmutter, D. D.(1994).Visual historical methods: Problems, prospects, applications.Historical Methods,27(4),167-184.
  42. Perse, E. M.,Pavitt, C.,Burggraf, C. S.(1990).Implicit theories of marriage and evaluations of marriage on television.Human Communication Research,16,387-408.
  43. Pollay, R. W.(1986).The Distorted Mirror: Reflections on the Unintended Consequences of Advertising.Journal of Marketing,50,18-36.
  44. Press, A.,Strathman, T.(1994).Work, family, and social class in television images of women: Primetime television and the construction of postfeminism.Women and Language,16,7-15.
  45. Roberts, E.,D. Pearl,L. Bouthilet,J. Lazar (Eds.)(1982).Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties.Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office.
  46. Rotzoll, K. B.,Haefner, J. E.,Sandage, C. H.(1990).Advertising in contemporary society.Chicago, IL:South-Western Publishing Co.
  47. Shaw, Ping,Chang, Wen-chia(2006).Paper presented at Internationalising Media Studies Conference.London, UK:University of Westminster.
  48. Sherry, J. F.,J. Umiker-Sebeok (Ed.)(1987).Marketing and semiotics.New York:Mouton de Gruyter.
  49. Signorielli, N.(1982).Marital status in television drama: A case of reduced options.Journal of Broadcasting,26,585-597.
  50. Skill, T.,Robinson, J. D.(1994).Four decades of family on television: A demographic profile, 1950-1989.Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media,38,449-464.
  51. Sontag, S.(1977).On photography.New York:Anchor Books.
  52. Stewart, D.(1984).Television and the image of the family.Munich:Stiftung Prix Jeunesse.
  53. Taylor, E.(1989).Prime time families.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  54. Tueth, M. V.(2000).Fun City.Journal of Popular Film & Television,28(3),98-107.
  55. Wernick, A.(1991).Promotional culture: Advertising, ideology and symbolic expression.London:Sage.
  56. Williams, R.(1980).Problems in materialism and multure: Selected essays.London:Verso.
  57. 方孝謙(1996)。形象廣告「台灣魚」的符號學分析。新聞學研究,52,149-165。
  58. 喻維欣、王振寰、瞿海源編(2003)。社會學與台灣社會。台北:巨流。
  59. 劉慧雯(2002)。Saussure符號學理論在廣告研究中的應用:文本意義研究的更絃易幟。新聞學研究,70,197-227。
  60. 廣告雜誌(2005)。2004年《Gunn Report》全球廣告創意報告。廣告雜誌,167,44-47。
被引用次数
  1. 林怡綾(2014)。花卉禮品包裝視覺元素對愛情情感溝通之影響。國立臺灣大學生物產業傳播暨發展學系學位論文。2014。1-128。