韓國的報業改革

The Press Reform in Korea

10.30386/MCR.200810_(97).0007

林麗雲(Lih-Yun Lin)

媒體改革運動 ； 報業政策 ； 韓國 ； 政治轉型 ； media reform ； press policy ； Korea ； political transition

新聞學研究

97期（2008 / 10 / 01）

257 - 282

繁體中文

正如「菁英延續論」所分析的，政治變遷中韓國報業的權力結構有延續性；過去的三大報仍寡占市場。但晚近韓國的媒體改革運動致力於打破寡占的結構。本文即關注：韓國報業的結構如何延續？媒改團體提出何種改革方案？在保守與改革勢力的拉鋸中報業法又有何種改變？ 本文的分析指出，在威權統治時期，韓國三大報業在國家的保護下成長，解禁後更以資本為後盾，用不公平交易的手法，擴張版圖，持續傳遞保守的意識型態。媒改團體為打破此寡占的結構，採取基進市場的途徑，推動修法。雖然過程充滿了對立與妥協，改革的理念仍進入了新的報業法。 由本文的分析可知，如「菁英延續論」的分析，傳播的權力結構有一定的延續性。但當媒改團體累積能量，形成理念，提出方案，採取行動，將成為一股批判的力量。因此，歷史的辯證過程中有延續性與變動性。

As the theory of elite continuity has indicated, the incumbent press continued its domination in Korea's political transition; however, media reformers have tried to challenge the current situation. This paper primarily focuses on the issues of (1) how press development is like and the continuation of its domination, (2) types of policy alternatives which the media reform groups proposed and (3) in the tug-of-war between the progressive and conservative forces, how the Press Law was changed afterwards. According to the analyses of this paper, under the authoritarian rule, the Korean press had been protected and developed into oligopoly. After deregulation, with firm base the incumbents won the competition by unfair practices. To dismantle this oligopoly, media reformers have followed a ”radical market approach” and proposed an alternative press policy. Some of their ideas were brought into the new Press Law after long confrontation and negotiations. Hence, the conclusion is that the continuities of media power in political transition still exits; however, by proposing policy alternatives and taking actions, media reform groups could become an important force.

1. CCDM(2005).An introduction to CCDM ([Citizens' Coalition for Democratic Media), ].unpublished Unpublished pamphlet.
2. Digital Chosun Ilbo
3. Digital Chosun Ilbo
4. Curran, J. (Eds.)(1986).Bending reality.London:Pluto.
5. Digital Chosun Ilbo
6. The Hankyoreh
7. Digital Chosun Ilbo
8. Digital Chosun Ilbo
9. Gross, P.(2002).Entangled evolutions: Media and democratization in Eastern Europe.Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. Han, D.(2000).The middle classes, ideological intention and resurrection of a progressive newspaper: A South Korean case.Gazette,62(1),61-74.
11. Digital Chosun Ilbo
12. Jakubowicz, K.(1995).Media within and without the state: Press freedom in Eastern Europe.Journal of Communication,45(3),125-139.
13. Kang, M. K.,J. N. Erni,S. K. Chua (Eds.)(1994).Asian media studies: Politics of subjectivities.London:Blackwell.
14. Kim, C.,Shin, T.,C. Kim,J. Lee (Eds.)(1994).Elite media amidst mass culture in Korea.Seoul:Nanam Publishing House.
15. Kim, Y.(2001).The broadcasting audience movements in Korea.Media, Culture and Society,23,91-107.
16. Kwak, K,P. Kitley (Ed.)(2003).Television, regulation and civil society in Asia.London:Routledge Curzon.
17. The Hankyoreh
18. Milton, A. K.(2001).Bound but not gadded: Media reform in democratic transitions.Comparative Political Studies,34(5),493-526.
19. Napoli, P. M.(2001).Foundations of communications policy: Principles and process in the regulation of electronic media.Cresskill, N.J.:Hampton Press.
20. Park, K.,Lee, J.,Kim, C. (Eds.)(1994).Elite media amidst mass culture in Korea.Seoul:Nanam Publishing House.
21. Park, M. J.,J. Curran,M. J. Park (Eds.)(2000).Dewesternizing media studies.London:Routledge.
22. Digital Chosun Ilbo
23. Sparks, C.(2008).Media systems in transition.Chinese Journal of Communication,1(1),7-24.
24. The Korean Press Foundation(2002).The Korean press 2002.Seoul:The Korean Press Foundation.
25. The Korean Press Foundation(2002).The Korean press 2003.Seoul:The Korean Press Foundation.
26. The Korean Press Foundation(2004).The Korean press 2005.Seoul:The Korean Press Foundation.
27. The Korean Press Foundation(2006).The Korean press 2006.Seoul:The Korean Press Foundation.
28. The Korean Press Foundation(2007).The Korean press 2007.Seoul:The Korean Press Foundation.
29. The Korean Press Institute(1984).The Korean press 1984.Seoul:The Korean Press Institute.
30. The Korean Press Institute(1989).The Korean press 1989.Seoul:The Korean Press Institute.
31. The Hankyoreh
32. Digital Chosun Ilbo
33. Youm, K. H.,C. Kim,J. Lee (Eds.)(1994).Elite media amidst mass culture in Korea.Seoul:Nanam Publishing House.
34. Youm, K. H.,P. H. O''Neil (Ed.)(1998).Communicating democracy: The media and political transitions.Boulder, Colo.:Lynne Rienner.
35. 김서중(2000).신문개혁 이렇게 합시다.서울:언론개혁시민연대.
36. 東亞日報
37. 郎勁松(2006)。韓國傳媒體制創新。廣州:南方日報出版社。
38. 신문발전위원회
39. 안상운(2000).신문개혁 이렇게 합시다.서울:언론개혁시민연대.
40. 언론개혁시민연대(2000).신문개혁 이렇게 합시다.서울:언론 개혁시민연대.
41. 임동욱(2000).신문개혁 이렇게 합시다.서울:언론개혁시민연대.

1. 林麗雲(2011)。節制私人資本、護衛公共責任：南韓電視體制的演進。新聞學研究，107，1-45。
2. 凃峻清(2023)。從「勞動權益」到「新聞專業」：自立事件的起源、過程與遺緒。新聞學研究，157，163-227。