政治名人與媒體：馬英九報導的新聞框架初探

How Newspapers Frame Political Celebrity? The Case of Ma Ying-jeou

10.30386/MCR.200904_(99).0001

邱宜儀(Yi-Yi Chiu)；蘇蘅(Herng Su)

新聞媒體 ； 政治名人 ； 新聞框架 ； 馬英九 ； news media ； political celebrity ； news frame ； Ma Ying-jeou

新聞學研究

99期（2009 / 04 / 01）

1 - 45

繁體中文

本研究主要目的在以政治人物馬英九為研究對象，探討台灣主要報紙是否出現「政治名人」現象，並分析「政治名人」的新聞框架有何特色。由於當代政治名人需要媒介曝光，本研究也探討政治人物為何受到媒介青睞，以及如何取得媒介上的發聲機會。本研究以馬英九從擔任台北市長起至卸任國民黨主席為止約十年來的新聞報導，從自由時報、聯合報及中國時報三家報紙以等距抽樣法抽取864 則新聞進行分析。結果顯示，三家報紙在「政治名人」的新聞框架上，三報政治立場雖然被認為有差異，但是在馬英九從政的三階段中，無論就個人特質、政治風格、背景故事和擬社會互動等四種新聞框架的分佈並無顯著差異。整體而言，報紙最重視的是「政治風格」和「擬社會互動」框架；其次，三家報紙除了持續報導政治人物在公共場域的新聞外，也出現更多以流行文化場域和私領域的新聞報導。三家報紙在馬英九從政三階段中，使用「名人」報導的新聞框架日漸增加，也越來越重視「政治風格」、「個人特質」等兩項和私領域及抽象印象有關的政治名人公眾形象之新聞框架。

It has been a commonplace among mass media in Taiwan that political celebrities garner attention for political performance as well as their personal lives. This study specifically focused on the analysis of Ying-Jeou Ma to learn the process of celebrification coupled with Gans description of the norms among news reporting. The questions this study primarily asked are how the politician, Ying-Jeou Ma's image has been constructed in the mainstream media; and how the three leading newspapers in Taiwan turned a public official into a celebrity and what impact the process of celebrification have caused on the more traditional political coverage. The results which were based on random sample news reporting in the past 10 years indicated that some newspapers have been followed a framing continuum, in which some news did indeed contain components of celebrification while others corresponded to a more traditional hard news. The results reflected no differences among three leading newspapers of reporting Ying-Jeou Ma's ”political styles” and ”parasocial interaction”. And on top of these, some novel tactic of adding new elements such as the politician's ”personal characteristics” have been increasing in the narratives. Nevertheless, the results indicated that growing presence within our media assures that the mass media in Taiwan has tendency to boast every facet of a politician's personal life into a glaring spotlight of the public sphere.

1. 許國賢(2005)。民主的政治成本。人文及社會科學集刊，17(2)，271-297。
   連結：
2. Ankersmit, F. R.(2002).Aesthtic politics: political philosophy beyond fact and value.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
3. Ankersmit, F. R.(1990).De navel van de geschiedenis.Groningen:Historische Uitgeverij.
4. Ankersmit, F. R.(1997).History and tropology: The rise and fall of metaphor.Berkeley:University of California Press.
5. Bek, M. G.(2004).Research note: Tabloidization of news media: An analysis of television news in Turkey.European Journal of Communication,19(3),371-386.
6. Benjamin, W.,Howard Eiland,Kevin McLaughlin (trans.)(1999).The arcades project.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
7. Bennett, W. L.,J. Corner (Eds.),D. Pels (Eds.)(2003).Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity, cynicism.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
8. Breda, L.(2007).People just like us: Political celebrity and creation of national ordinary.Paper presented at International Communication Association Conference
9. Bryant, J.,Miron, D.(2004).Theory and research in mass communication.Journal of Communication,54(4),662-704.
10. Conley, A.,Shultz, D.(2000).Jesse Ventura and brave new world with politainer politics.Journal of American and Comparative Culture,23(3),49-59.
11. Corner, J.(2000).Mediated persona and political culture: Dimensions of structure and process.European Journal of Cultural Studies,3(3),286-402.
12. Corner, J. (Eds.),D. Pels (Eds.)(2003).Media and the restyling of politics: consumerism, celebrity, cynicism.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
13. Crick, B.(2002).Democracy: A very short introduction.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
14. Entman, R. M.(1993).Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.Journal of Communication,43,51-58.
15. Gans, H.(1979).Deciding what's news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time.New York:Pantheon Books.
16. Giles, D.(1974).Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and model for future research.Media Psychology,4,279-305.
17. Goffman, E.(1974).Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
18. Goffman, E.(1959).The presentation of self in everyday life.Garden City, NY:Doubleday.
19. Habermas, J.(1988).The structural transformation of the public sphere.Cambridge:Polity.
20. Hendrickson, E. M.,Wilkins, T.(2007).The Political is the personal: Celebritizing politicians in the 21st Century.Student Papers on Program at 2007 International Communication Association Conference,San Francisco:
21. Holmes, M.(2000).When is the personal political? The president's penis and other stories.Sociology,32(2),305-321.
22. Holmes, S.(2005).Starring… Dyer? Re-visiting star studies and contemporary celebrity culture.Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture,2(2),6-21.
23. House, R. J.,Howell, J. M.(1992).Personality and charismatic leadership.Leadership Quarterly,3(2),81-108.
24. Kieran, M.(1998).Media ethics.New York:Routledge.
25. Marshall, P. D.(1997).Celebrity and power.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
26. Meyer, T.(2002).Media democracy: How the media colonise politics.Cambridge:Polity.
27. Meyrowitz, J.(1985).No sense of place.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
28. Pels, D.,J. Corner (Eds.),D. Pels (Eds.)(2003).Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity, cynicism.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
29. Plasser, F.(2005).From the hard to soft news standards? How political journalists in different media systems evaluate the shifting quality of news.Harvard Journal of Press/Politics,10(2),47-68.
30. Renshon, S. A.(1995).The Clinton presidency: Campaigning, governing and psychology of leadership.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
31. Renshon, S. A.(1996).The psychological assesment of presidential candidates.New York:New York University Press.
32. Rojek, C.(2001).Celebrity.London:Reaktion Books Ltd.
33. Schlesinger, P.,M. Ferguson (Ed.)(1990).Public communication: The new imperatives.London:Sage Ltd.
34. Schumpeter, J.,T. B. Bottomore (Ed.)(1976).Socialism and democracy.New York:Harper Torchbooks.
35. Shultz, D.(2001).Celebrity politics in the postmodern era: The case of Jesse Ventura.Public Integrity,3(4),363-376.
36. Street, J.(1997).Politics and popular culture.Cambridge:Political Press.
37. Street, J.(2004).Celebrity politicians: Popular culture and political representation.The British Journal of Politics & International Relations,6(4),435-452.
38. Street, J.,J. Corner (Eds.),D. Pels (Eds.)(2003).Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity, cynicism.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
39. Van Zoonen, L.(2005).Entertaining the citizen: When politics and popular culture converge.New York:Rowman & Littlefield.
40. Van Zoonen, L.(1998).'Finally I have my mother back': Politicians and their families in popular culture.Harvard Journal of Press/Politics,3(1),48-64.
41. Van Zoonen, L.,J. Corner (Eds.),D. Pels (Eds.)(2003).Media and restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity, cynicism.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
42. Weiskel, T. C.(2005).From sidekick to sideshow-Celebrity, entertainment, and the politics of distraction.American Behaviour Scientist,491(3),393-409.
43. Zolo, D.(1992).Democracy and complexity.Cambridge:Polity.
44. 王建雄(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。東海大學政治學系碩士論文。
45. 江孟穎(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所。
46. 吳璧如(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。東吳大學政治學系。
47. 李人豪(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學廣播電視學研究所。
48. 李祖舜(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。政治大學傳播學院。
49. 金溥聰(1997)。報紙的形象設定效果研究：以民國八十三年台北市長選舉爲例。新聞學研究，55，203-223。
50. 郁嬿如(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。淡江大學大眾傳播學系。
51. 陳憶寧(2004)。媒體議題與公眾議題演化過程之探討：以2002年台北市長選舉爲例。新聞學研究，81，125-126。

1. 陳承泰,莊伯仲(2019)。廣大興28號事件之新聞交鋒：臺菲國家通訊社觀點。傳播研究與實踐，9(2)，133-170。
2. 黃瓊恩、王傑賢、方佩欣(2015)。運動媒體報導運動明星之價值研究─以林書豪報導為例。臺大體育學報，28，13-23。
3. 黃亭云,張淑珍,洪世章,黃亭云,張淑珍,洪世章(2022)。Face It, Accept It, Deal with It, and Let It Go: How Does Taiwan\'s Society Respond to the COVID-19 Pandemic?。管理評論，41(4)，127-148。
4. 江靜之(2011)。舊聞中找新聞：從訪問者角度看廣電新聞訪問互文性。傳播與管理研究，10(2)，-3-36。
5. (2019)。從盟友到對手：柯文哲參選市長的媒體建構之比較研究(2014 與 2018)。傳播管理學刊，20(2)，32-48。
6. (2022)。面對它、接受它、處理它、放下它：台灣社會如何回應新冠疫情？。管理評論，41(4)，43-65。