题名

邁向速度存有論-即時性電子媒介時代的風險

并列篇名

Toward the Ontology of Velocity: Risk at the Age of Real-time Media

DOI

10.30386/MCR.200910_(101).0004

作者

黃厚銘(Arthur Hou-Ming Huang)

关键词

技術哲學 ; 海德格 ; 麥克魯漢 ; 維希留 ; 史蒂格勒 ; philosophy of technology ; Heidegger ; McLuhan ; Virilio ; Stiegler

期刊名称

新聞學研究

卷期/出版年月

101期(2009 / 10 / 01)

页次

139 - 175

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文主要是藉由速度的概念來重新理解幾位重要思想家的思想,論證速度概念乃是他們省思現代科技及媒介的核心概念,進而指出速度概念是掌握當今社會文化特性的關鍵之一。而為了凸顯速度概念的重要性,本文從Heidegger有關科技與人類之間的存有論著作入手,取徑McLuhan關於傳播媒介對社會文化影響之相關論述、Stiegler有關技術、速度與時間之間關係的討論,以及Virilio對即時性電子媒介的速度學分析,逐步證成本文的主張。進而延伸Heidegger的技術存有論,提出速度存有論的概念,凸顯速度與人類之間乃是一種涉及人類身體與存有本質的風險關係。換言之,人類的本質乃是由工具、科技的使用所界定,而追求速度又做為科技進展的重心,但缺乏自覺的加速卻也蘊含著失控的可能性,尤其即時性電子媒介的發展更可能危及人類的存有本質。更清楚地說,人類對科技的控制能力永遠是落後於科技的進展,而正如Stiegler與Virilio所指出的,在即時性電子媒介所主導的當代,此一時間落差在即時性(realtime)壓縮真實空間(realspace)、促成全球化趨勢的同時,不僅風險的規模更為擴大,也可能更為迅速,乃至於風險的內涵亦更深刻地指向人類的存有本質,從而危及人類做為人類的根本。

英文摘要

With the concept of speed, this paper intends to refresh our understanding of the thought of certain thinkers in order to reflect on the characteristic of modern society. Starting from Heidegger's ontology of technology, the author tries to reinterpret the media theory of McLuhan, Stiegler's book on technics, speed, and time, and Virilio's dromology to illuminate that the relationships between human beings and speed is one of ontological one with its risk regarding the essence of human nature. However, with the advance of modernization and the acceleration of technology and media to the instantaneity of real-time, our ability to control this development always lags further behind the immediate happening of the risk and the speedy change of technology and our social, cultural milieu. In order not to lose control of this process of speed-up, it is necessary for us to elaborate the conceptual and theoretical contents of ontology of velocity to capture the mechanism of this transformation.

主题分类 社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. Bauman, Z.(2005).Liquid life.Cambridge:Polity.
  2. Bauman, Z.(2000).Liquid modernity.Cambridge:Polity.
  3. Beck, U.,M. Ritter (Trans.)(1992).Risk society: Towards a new modernity.California:Sage.
  4. Beniger, J.(1986).The control revolution: Technological and cconomic origins of the information society.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
  5. Ende, M.(1994).Momo.Canada:Penguin Books.
  6. Giddens, A.(1991).Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age.California:Stanford U Press.
  7. Heidegger, M.,D. F. Krell (Ed.)(1993).Basic writings: Ten key essays, plus the introduction to Being and Time.San Francisco:HarprerSanFrancisco.
  8. Heidegger, M.,J. Stambaugh (Trans.)(1996).Being and time: A translation of Sein and Zeit.New York:State University of New York.
  9. Heim, M.(1993).The metaphysics of virtual reality.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  10. Honore, C.(2005).praise of slow: How a worldwide movement is challenging the cult of speed.London:Orion Books.
  11. Innis, H. A.(1964).The bias of communication.Toronto:University of Toronto Press.
  12. Kant, I.,H. Reiss (Ed.)(1991).Kant's political writings.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  13. Kundera, M.(2005).Slowness.New York:HarperCollins.
  14. Lash, S.(2002).Critique of information.London:Sage.
  15. Marx, K.(2007).Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844.Dover Books.
  16. McLuhan, M.(1964).Understanding media: The extension of man.London:Routledge.
  17. McLuhan, M.,Fiore, Q.(1967).The medium is the massage: An inventory of effects.New York:Bantam Books.
  18. Postman, N.(1992).Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology.New York:Vintage Books.
  19. Seubold, G.(1983).Heideggers Analyse der neuzeitlichen Technik.Freiburg:K. Alber..
  20. Stiegler, B.(1998).Technics and time, 1: The fault of Epimetheus.Stanford:Standford University Press.
  21. Tenner, E.(1998).Why things bite back.
  22. Vernant, Jean-Pierre(2002).The universe, the Gods, and men: Ancient Greek Myths.New York:Perennial.
  23. Virilio, P.(1995).The art of the motor.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
  24. Virilio, P.(1997).Open sky.New York:Verso.
  25. Virilio, P. C.(2000).Polar inertia.London:Sage.
  26. Virilio, P.,P. Petit(1999).Politics of the very worst: An interview by Philippe Petit.New York:Semiotext(e).
  27. Wertheim, M.(1999).The pearly gates of cyberspace: A history of space from Dante to the Internet.New York:W. W. Norton & Company.
  28. 宋祖良譯(1991)。海德格爾分析新時代的技術。北京:中國社會科學出社。
  29. 李常傳譯(2000)。默默。台北:遊目族。
  30. 俞灝敏譯(1998)。控制革命。台北:桂冠。
  31. 尉遲秀譯(2005)。緩慢。台北:皇冠。
  32. 陳榮華(2003)。海德格「存有與時間」闡釋。台北:台大出版中心。
  33. 黃厚銘(2001)。Heidegger的哲學思想與資訊科技。資訊社會研究,1,1-31。
  34. 薛絢譯(1999)。空間地圖:從但丁的空間到網路的空間。台北:商務。
  35. 顏湘如譯(2005)。慢活。台北:大塊。
  36. 蘇采禾譯(1998)。科技反撲:萬物對人類展開報復。台北:時報。
被引用次数
  1. 胡正光(2022)。速度殖民:評析維希留的速度社會理論。思與言:人文與社會科學期刊,60(1),140-192。
  2. 黃厚銘(2017)。「真實」的復歸:擴增實境遊戲Ingress 社會文化意義之分析。考古人類學刊,86,43-68。
  3. 駱世查(2019)。書評:數位時代的媒介史與作為關係的技術:評《製造時間》。新聞學研究,139,149-159。
  4. 翁秀琪(2011)。什麼是「蜜迪亞」?重新思考媒體/媒介研究。傳播研究與實踐,1(1),55-74。